Quantity, topics, methods and findings of randomised controlled trials published by German university departments of general practice - systematic review.

about

Quantity, topics, methods and findings of randomised controlled trials published by German university departments of general practice - systematic review.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36828923

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Quantity, topics, methods and ...... practice - systematic review.

@en

type

Item

label

Quantity, topics, methods and ...... practice - systematic review.

@en

prefLabel

Quantity, topics, methods and ...... practice - systematic review.

@en

P1476

Quantity, topics, methods and ...... l practice - systematic review

@en

P2093

Antonius Schneider

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

DFG Network Clinical Trials in General Practice

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Klaus Linde

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

P2860

Are missing data adequately handled in cluster randomised trials? A systematic review and guidelines.

Practices, patients and (im)perfect data--feasibility of a randomised controlled clinical drug trial in German general practices.

The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010

Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis.

Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care.

General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis.

Bias in recruitment to cluster randomized trials: a review of recent publications.

Towards efficient use of research resources: a nationwide database of ongoing primary care research projects in the Netherlands.

Bias in identifying and recruiting participants in cluster randomised trials: what can be done?

P2888

s13063-016-1328-y

P304

211

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

meta-analysis

P356

10.1186/S13063-016-1328-Y

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Stefan Heinmüller

P577

2016-04-23T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1020807761

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

27107809

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

biomedical investigative technique

P932

4842270

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string