Why are peer review outcomes less favorable for clinical science than for basic science grant applications?
about
An analysis of preliminary and post-discussion priority scores for grant applications peer reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIHFactors Associated With Success of Clinician-Researchers Receiving Career Development Awards From the National Institutes of Health: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency.
P2860
Why are peer review outcomes less favorable for clinical science than for basic science grant applications?
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
2008年论文
@zh
2008年论文
@zh-cn
name
Why are peer review outcomes l ...... ic science grant applications?
@en
type
label
Why are peer review outcomes l ...... ic science grant applications?
@en
prefLabel
Why are peer review outcomes l ...... ic science grant applications?
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Why are peer review outcomes l ...... ic science grant applications?
@en
P2093
Michael R Martin
Teresa Lindquist
Theodore A Kotchen
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.AMJMED.2008.03.031
P407
P577
2008-07-01T00:00:00Z