Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception
about
Femilis(®) 60 Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System-A Review of 10 Years of Clinical ExperienceReducing Unintended Pregnancies as a Strategy to Avert Zika-Related Microcephaly Births in the United States: A Simulation StudyTwenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraceptionCost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 13.5 mg in contraception.Adolescent substance use and unplanned pregnancy: strategies for risk reduction.Trends in use of and complications from intrauterine contraceptive devices and tubal ligation or occlusionThe burden of unintended pregnancies in Brazil: a social and public health system cost analysisUse of frameless intrauterine devices and systems in young nulliparous and adolescent women: results of a multicenter study.Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive useCelebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.Development and psychometric testing of the attitude toward potential pregnancy scale.Achieving cost-neutrality with long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.Provider counseling to young women seeking family planning services.Contraceptive options and their associated estrogenic environmental loads: relationships and trade-offs.Use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device beyond the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved duration.Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception.Rationale and enrollment results for a partially randomized patient preference trial to compare continuation rates of short-acting and long-acting reversible contraceptionReducing unintended pregnancies: a microsimulation of contraceptive switching, discontinuation, and failure patterns in france.The Cost-Effectiveness of Emergency Hormonal Contraception with Ulipristal Acetate versus Levonorgestrel for Minors in France.Cost-Effectiveness of Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Etonogestrel Implant InsertionMedical Abortion Provided by Nurse-Midwives or Physicians in a High Resource Setting: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Cost-effectiveness analysis of a low-dose contraceptive levonorgestrel intrauterine system in Sweden.Precision intrauterine contraception may significantly increase continuation of use: a review of long-term clinical experience with frameless copper-releasing intrauterine contraception devices."I don't know enough to feel comfortable using them:" Women's knowledge of and perceived barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives on a college campus.Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).Shared Decision Aids: Increasing Patient Acceptance of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.Agreement between patient-reported and provider-reported choice of contraceptive method among family planning patients in New York City: implications for public healthRetrospective analysis of the impact of increasing access to long acting reversible contraceptives in a commercially insured population.The Complexity of Multiple Contraceptive Method Use and the Anxiety That Informs It: Implications for Theory and Practice.Increasing the uptake of long-acting reversible contraception in general practice: the Australian Contraceptive ChOice pRoject (ACCORd) cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.HIV/Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention Messaging: Targeting Root Causes of Sexual Risk Behavior.The copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: an opportunity to provide the optimal emergency contraception method and transition to highly effective contraception.Long-acting reversible contraception: a review in special populations.Systematic literature review of the costs of pregnancy in the US.Contraceptive Coverage and the Affordable Care Act.Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices by registered nurses in Australia.Revolving Loan Fund: A Novel Approach to Increasing Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Methods in Community Health Centers.Likelihood of repeat abortion in a Swedish cohort according to the choice of post-abortion contraception: a longitudinal study.Pregnancy Ambivalence and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) Use Among Young Adult Women: A Qualitative Study.Integrating Pregnancy Ambivalence and Effectiveness in Contraceptive Choice.
P2860
Q26740182-A1DEF9D3-E87C-430F-A3C1-EF78851226FBQ28583338-B01B298C-6157-4E63-8005-357AA87EC708Q33574772-627C4E18-19A9-4C56-8559-4AC17E96AC95Q33605175-84100A18-686C-4B04-A299-69074BA307CFQ33651864-CA945100-FF30-42F6-B7BC-07565C43F5B2Q33781229-6DCC094E-919E-42A2-BF98-BC48F2A82492Q33933835-FE0AFBAD-D075-45CB-9D5A-A6133A7299BDQ34035997-142BDA24-57EF-4582-84FC-ED00514ED4AEQ34437739-3DCA3D2C-6FA7-46E4-AC5B-6E4FC95165CBQ34609791-DEDE4296-D596-4C29-8D66-2E49FB3E87A6Q34643957-F51764F0-54A7-46CE-80EA-5EA70B91EF3CQ34714453-73827B90-B5FD-413F-AF6C-6B28A795849EQ34723516-FA280484-37F3-4585-B46A-BAE29C2AA439Q35132097-2ADECE65-224F-494F-8FEA-7CD81840DF09Q35142030-AC7081D1-34DE-47ED-93AC-AECAC81EA8D9Q35205464-CA7A1DB4-E868-42C8-BCA6-A5CFDC8E7E1DQ35208014-D7E2BEA1-41F5-4340-89C8-2F16203875F9Q35687763-D0B11BF1-725C-4D87-B4F1-C0ABC236C793Q35793712-3339B368-2025-4625-9C4E-72AF1BF83F80Q35919970-A2A5DF39-1E15-4F3F-84D7-9D75B075CC7EQ36064773-B7067A12-6748-4BBC-9E23-F9012365B62AQ36554644-EE4BE89B-6193-484D-8119-F2AE799EDAE8Q36821031-526DF106-7478-4D6A-A726-85947FBD574BQ36858611-93419307-5752-4B8E-B8E5-0F751E2DB912Q36945498-652D3334-713B-4212-B16C-EE111933AEBCQ37081556-38058403-830F-4E0C-9BC7-3C69696E5BE6Q37164589-7FF7716F-2064-4E31-8498-33B4939E92D7Q37196212-F58CC880-C8BC-4E98-8FF0-BDA762DE5418Q37310134-223ED200-0909-488E-ACFB-D2F4E14EA9E7Q37355874-910F6CAC-22FF-4BD1-A8EF-0DA785B01668Q37380134-7C381031-972B-46A3-A9C9-C9055B9227E7Q38124888-8C4D9C63-42FA-4998-889F-00E5C7BD7C9AQ38153019-BB986A34-83FE-4442-B7A2-15C467984AE1Q38155459-9E2C8D86-3A49-496B-8CD1-72A4DD369967Q38644904-CEA4E7BC-F3E1-4B88-BCD8-B3B2B9ADAA6CQ38667838-B196134A-6D7A-485E-97EB-EDDB8ACD5C35Q38719191-5C617AF4-179B-43AE-83A5-03541DB4BA3CQ38731014-5DD7FA28-B6BF-486C-9076-0A29207F0B10Q38832043-3129F7E6-833A-4DA9-A130-0E2062F3A6E5Q38841556-C6506232-9A31-4EE6-A267-2B1D908ECD60
P2860
Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
Burden of unintended pregnancy ...... cting reversible contraception
@en
type
label
Burden of unintended pregnancy ...... cting reversible contraception
@en
prefLabel
Burden of unintended pregnancy ...... cting reversible contraception
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Burden of unintended pregnancy ...... cting reversible contraception
@en
P2093
Alexander Prezioso
Anna Filonenko
Fareen Hassan
James Trussell
Nathaniel Henry
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2012.07.016
P577
2012-09-07T00:00:00Z