p16 expression differentiates high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor and predicts poor outcome. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

p16 expression differentiates high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor and predicts poor outcome.

p16 expression differentiates high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor and predicts poor outcome.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36897784

about

Dinosaurs and ancient civilizations: reflections on the treatment of cancer Neoplasia: the second decade.Cyclin H expression is increased in GIST with very-high risk of malignancy High density DNA array analysis reveals distinct genomic profiles in a subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors Loss of chromosome 9p21 and decreased p16 expression correlate with malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of gastointestinal stromal tumors.Expression of DOG1, PDGFRA, and p16 in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Review of the molecular profile and modern prognostic markers for gastric lymphoma: how do they affect clinical practice?Genomic Grade Index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of GIST.Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a review.The War on Cancer rages on.Gastrointestinal stromal tumours at present: an approach to burning questions.P16 overexpression in BRAF-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activity Correlates with the Prognosis of Patients Who Have Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.A molecular portrait of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an integrative analysis of gene expression profiling and high-resolution genomic copy number.Expression level of the mitotic checkpoint protein and G2-M cell cycle regulators and prognosis in gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach.New targets and therapies for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.ETV4 collaborates with Wnt/β-catenin signaling to alter cell cycle activity and promote tumor aggressiveness in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Contributes to Tumor Malignancy and Is Targetable in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.Correlation of dynamic PET and gene array data in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Expression of p16INK4A in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): two different forms exist that independently correlate with poor prognosis.

P2860

Q24628746-DAC0F203-B199-4CBD-B1B6-02879CCB3DCB Q30484000-8BFFFD34-1AB1-485D-9F30-9DFA18DED79B Q33624209-8A7A463A-A4BF-425C-9DD3-544FF94203B3 Q33695315-D628F605-22FF-4A7B-AA98-8181D2AB40E1 Q34183218-B3717F32-66E2-4B9D-B3B8-B4A3D0AB6185 Q34193040-07F422BE-2934-4B2A-AAF7-F6D0BCD31972 Q35119141-D3FCFBA8-283C-4C1A-A38A-CF48456363A1 Q35847885-45491861-6784-4C2E-BE25-3F821B557FDF Q36387916-4253F9CC-9415-413C-9EFB-87A962EBAC90 Q37400162-301D3FD7-E65D-4EB8-A64C-432BD007E2F8 Q37478602-C13DFACD-6265-4E12-BE82-AED1D9EA8F87 Q37692669-03E7085F-64FE-4D26-88F7-A5BC2DFAA5BD Q39052440-2B012D29-8FC8-4770-AA74-43E9A2A1B2EC Q41365125-34E1CE2C-EC6D-44AD-B395-EA7234F8EA56 Q43465485-377B9A6C-A8C4-426E-AD72-9D74F83A887C Q44522889-EFCC3270-CF3F-45A8-90B6-52A9C551C19C Q47432725-E3118819-1DEB-474D-817C-C19BCBB74A20 Q49678212-D1687D75-7C34-490B-B114-703EB53E8DBA Q50435067-9741C6EA-AC9B-4579-9D46-7776D61DA187 Q51354549-D0B7EA3C-0E62-499D-9089-DA09B284E94D Q54675209-EF53522C-A277-4FED-B9C8-63C765D551C8

P2860

p16 expression differentiates high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor and predicts poor outcome.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36897784

description

2008 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2008年の論文

@ja

2008年論文

@yue

2008年論文

@zh-hant

2008年論文

@zh-hk

2008年論文

@zh-mo

2008年論文

@zh-tw

2008年论文

@wuu

2008年论文

@zh

2008年论文

@zh-cn

name

p16 expression differentiates ...... mor and predicts poor outcome.

@en

type

label

p16 expression differentiates ...... mor and predicts poor outcome.

@en

prefLabel

p16 expression differentiates ...... mor and predicts poor outcome.

@en

P1433

Q36897784-921A1F26-7D5D-44C9-8C92-3FD820C00BFB

P1476

Q36897784-463D6E8F-43E8-43C7-90A4-17D4113597C8

P2093

Q36897784-015065D5-4ACA-46DE-876A-6C0620253C05

Q36897784-2B43AA09-71A6-423F-83E3-43F4DE417124

Q36897784-2E3095E3-F2F5-4D42-A61D-449D66392182

Q36897784-5BFBC406-F308-4C6A-99A5-C9EE4CDCA6BE

Q36897784-6577AF80-4218-47C2-B87F-A8696CB1F09A

Q36897784-98C5570E-93C0-46D8-AC41-E730FF2DE098

Q36897784-C80D01CF-11CF-487B-BAE1-D84A4C710D1D

Q36897784-D7A0D5BE-6CD2-4047-B221-DD078EA9B261

Q36897784-E3B4AE06-D1FA-41CB-A9CA-A8B53E83E6CC

Q36897784-E4B8C97A-3564-4BF4-8760-7D159881A1E8

P2860

Q36897784-0CD48ED1-17E7-475B-B4CA-9A8A64DF22AE

Q36897784-0D528D6C-54EE-4864-B2AD-7CF0FA98DD99

Q36897784-0EA5A2C2-D98F-4854-8529-82EA680EFBCC

Q36897784-0EF0E1A2-B307-41B3-B4EF-937B57723FCA

Q36897784-14835F9B-6B67-4ED6-A094-F96E3CFC3DD3

Q36897784-18DDE0A5-F6C0-47CD-8C9A-A3B07D1236AD

Q36897784-1A0B4F51-C266-4704-9353-13BC8BAF64F9

Q36897784-1D924436-84C7-4886-BA80-7E480B059AF5

Q36897784-22D58E90-1960-47FF-9733-8B9B260D6F23

Q36897784-26BEDDDE-7E79-4B4E-B374-5DB78444BB46

P304

Q36897784-24B7A0BE-7BB8-497A-90F3-0160CCF93804

P31

Q36897784-40977986-637A-40CA-BB21-5016C36D6BBF

P356

Q36897784-7CEF1A99-C2B5-4A9B-B66F-90F78C752A01

P433

Q36897784-FB931681-74C0-461B-B68C-94C5DDC4FD3B

P478

Q36897784-9437EDE6-015A-4007-B884-265A9AD5EE78

P577

Q36897784-008167D0-6F84-47AA-A763-F283443CC0C5

P5875

Q36897784-464A9922-FC4B-4F6F-8028-F9AA7EDD00DD

P698

Q36897784-9A04B60C-F076-4D25-8D1E-5A11B4F392D3

P932

Q36897784-6EB7DB67-B14A-403D-AF64-D9E3E089DD1B

P356

P1433

P1476

p16 expression differentiates ...... mor and predicts poor outcome.

@en

P2093

Bettina Danner

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Cornelia Hasel

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Doris Henne-Bruns

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Klaus Kramer

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Markus S Juchems

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michael Schmieder

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Peter Wuerl

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sebastian Wolf

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Susanne Stoehr

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Uwe Knippschild

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Surgical resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): experience on 25 patients

Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Synchronous occurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and other primary gastrointestinal neoplasms.

Immunohistochemical staining with MIB1, bcl2 and p16 assists in the distinction of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia from tubo-endometrial metaplasia, endometriosis and microglandular hyperplasia.

Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the small intestine: a review of 50 cases from a prospective database.

The effect of surgery and grade on outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival.

Surgery and imatinib in the management of GIST: emerging approaches to adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up.

P304

1154-1162

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1593/NEO.08646

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

10

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

10

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2008-10-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

23279335

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

18813351

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

2546588

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string