Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
about
A pure invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast with bone metastasis if untreated for thirteen years: a case report and literature reviewBiomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosisURINARY MELATONIN IN RELATION TO POSTMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER RISK ACCORDING TO MELATONIN 1 RECEPTOR STATUSIdentification of breast cancer patients with a high risk of developing brain metastases: a single-institutional retrospective analysis.Protein expression profile and prevalence pattern of the molecular classes of breast cancer--a Saudi population based studyMagnetic resonance imaging features of breast cancer according to intrinsic subtypes: correlations with neoadjuvant chemotherapy effects.Hypothesized role of pregnancy hormones on HER2+ breast tumor development.Breast Cancer Survival Defined by the ER/PR/HER2 Subtypes and a Surrogate Classification according to Tumor Grade and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers.Gene expression in histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients and from cancer-free prophylactic mastectomy patients shares a similar profile.Thyroid transcription factor-1 positive primary breast cancer: a case report with review of the literature.Dietary fat intake in relation to lethal breast cancer in two large prospective cohort studies.Adult body size and physical activity in relation to risk of breast cancer according to tumor androgen receptor statusHow many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more?Androgen receptor expression and breast cancer survival in postmenopausal women.HSF1 drives a transcriptional program distinct from heat shock to support highly malignant human cancers.Regression of ductal carcinoma in situ after treatment with acupunctureMolecular phenotypes of unifocal, multifocal, and diffuse invasive breast carcinomasDefining breast cancer prognosis based on molecular phenotypes: results from a large cohort study.Molecular subtyping of DCIS: heterogeneity of breast cancer reflected in pre-invasive disease.Identification of early molecular markers for breast cancer.Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between histopathological features and age of patientsEstrogen receptor-beta expression in invasive breast cancer in relation to molecular phenotype: results from the Nurses' Health Study.Biological Markers in DCIS and Risk of Breast Recurrence: A Systematic Review.Reproductive factors and risk of hormone receptor positive and negative breast cancer: a cohort studyAndrogen receptor expression in breast cancer in relation to molecular phenotype: results from the Nurses' Health Study.Very low prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression and gene amplification in Saudi breast cancer patients.Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics.The significance of HER-2/neu receptor positivity and immunophenotype in ductal carcinoma in situ with early invasive disease.High levels of nuclear heat-shock factor 1 (HSF1) are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer.Dense and nondense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics.Traditional breast cancer risk factors in relation to molecular subtypes of breast cancerEpidermal growth factor receptor in breast carcinoma: association between gene copy number and mutations.A Comparative Analysis of Biomarker Expression and Molecular Subtypes of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Carcinoma by Image Analysis: Relationship of the Subtypes with Histologic Grade, Ki67, p53 Overexpression, and DNA PloidyLarge palpable ductal carcinoma in situ is Her-2 positive with high nuclear gradeCOX-2 expression predicts worse breast cancer prognosis and does not modify the association with aspirinMolecular Phenotype of Breast Cancer According to Time Since Last Pregnancy in a Large Cohort of Young Women.Age of 40 years or younger is an independent risk factor for locoregional failure in early breast cancer: a single-institutional analysis in saudi arabia.Mechanobiology of tumor invasion: engineering meets oncology.HER-2 pulsed dendritic cell vaccine can eliminate HER-2 expression and impact ductal carcinoma in situ.Cell polarity, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and cell-fate decision gene expression in ductal carcinoma in situ.
P2860
Q26865686-139DFB1F-7681-407F-937A-56D2BED1CE55Q28280822-FBDA7BEA-F2A6-4BF4-A21C-DC97AA692D3DQ29248164-A8C49B2A-6B56-4D76-88F4-A3714C7BF1BDQ33553971-2F712F88-3588-4A6C-B8BB-C82D189BA46CQ33584351-0A09C720-53E6-46D8-BDA5-C2D18B0AF065Q33690733-E65FE23A-5E74-47C1-BA1D-FF6BC49B0DF4Q33745434-2BDF36C2-EC5A-4B99-9314-D250788425F9Q33757796-DBB80997-31D9-4358-80C2-D2CC15C48C37Q33794872-9A52A6AB-6A70-47EA-9620-9574D50F483EQ33958638-DD7FD78A-0D8F-4748-9B8A-F4928348A2B0Q34014487-6335B805-17B9-4516-B7A1-E111DA6BF5BBQ34043711-26CE4B12-31ED-4388-9046-A73D67D387F9Q34106175-F36DDBE3-CC0F-4DB5-82A3-6ED2DE364B63Q34164902-8531AB87-24E5-4BE1-905D-BCDC5446259FQ34292197-196D3884-9287-44E2-A45B-4486D6D394BFQ34335729-20DC3D58-D38A-4B9B-83BA-B9B56E5F63BCQ34373120-6AFDE794-D6D6-4827-8F46-809B5168C43CQ34516677-E8670B23-39B8-4904-86F1-66C77FC98597Q34577467-DC6C455E-2FD5-4C89-B99E-FA4DA1D09EEAQ34608080-7426835A-8A93-4BDC-8CE1-005A42078822Q34659455-6002D46A-8CDF-4610-865C-8FAA13372A02Q34663257-E0FB7503-574A-446A-BD61-0508761EDBAAQ34940834-4FE1B6FE-53A8-4F18-A2D0-C2152DA6FA5BQ35062955-4D3148E1-615B-4D61-93C0-150DBE5B7AD4Q35083868-CCA8D9B1-4ABC-44CF-80C2-CC0ADE06044DQ35122066-FD9BCABC-701E-4BAC-AFD8-F5F416DB3916Q35143969-84F45080-E02F-442E-AB48-7FEF77CD5113Q35201328-50A6A871-6685-44DB-B63A-3E3AA60A9B86Q35546764-303014E3-426A-4F50-91E3-493B40318D8EQ35562818-3BC26E0C-D6D8-4636-8743-8C0E4D0CFF4EQ35613614-1FD0DB66-05B3-43E1-8767-08A9951057C8Q35642677-B84CA662-79EF-410A-BA30-7ACABEF87AAFQ35684433-D25A9F8A-AB3A-4670-8B87-2B24ED9AFA48Q35741089-21680296-092E-46D9-892D-5425D1E485AEQ35797114-5A860C99-BCCA-4913-B287-6092B7E972D3Q35820514-6FD77E7E-1963-4474-95CD-15C0003A3920Q35876120-7B233395-CFE6-42FE-BA67-23C8A1BAE040Q35877893-797E742D-EC4D-4822-9DBD-2F084F8B4371Q35899068-13FF7C0C-E72E-4407-B531-107738DF6D58Q35909091-194D919C-BB69-45BE-BDB7-6CCC3F00B8D6
P2860
Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
2008年论文
@zh
2008年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of molecular phenot ...... tu and invasive breast cancer.
@en
type
label
Comparison of molecular phenot ...... tu and invasive breast cancer.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of molecular phenot ...... tu and invasive breast cancer.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Comparison of molecular phenot ...... tu and invasive breast cancer.
@en
P2093
Anne C Deitz
Heather J Baer
James L Connolly
Jonathan Marotti
Laura C Collins
Laurie Galaburda
Mark Galan
Rulla M Tamimi
Stuart J Schnitt
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/BCR2128
P577
2008-08-05T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1001913224