Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness

about

Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37007081

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@pt

bilimsel makale

@tr

scientific article published on 09 June 2016

@en

vedecký článok

@sk

vetenskaplig artikel

@sv

videnskabelig artikel

@da

vědecký článek

@cs

name

Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness

@en

Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness.

@nl

type

Item

label

Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness

@en

Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness.

@nl

prefLabel

Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness

@en

Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness.

@nl

P1476

Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness

@en

P2093

A Alyass

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A Ishola

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A Lamri

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A Li

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A Mayhew

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

C Stryjecki

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

D Meyre

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

F Yazdi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

H Reddon

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

N Vashi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Five years of GWAS discovery

A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research

Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography

Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?

Does genetic heterogeneity account for the divergent risk of type 2 diabetes in South Asian and white European populations?

Systematic reviews of genetic association studies. Human Genome Epidemiology Network.

P304

e010403

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-010403

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2016-06-09T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

27288371

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

4908888

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string