Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence
about
Minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic reviewMASTERS-D Study: A Prospective, Multicenter, Pragmatic, Observational, Data-Monitored Trial of Minimally Invasive Fusion to Treat Degenerative Lumbar Disorders, One-Year Follow-Up.Is circumferential minimally invasive surgery effective in the treatment of moderate adult idiopathic scoliosis?A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with direct lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results.A comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review and meta-analysis.Modified minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a trans-multifidus approach: a safe and effective alternative to open-TLIF.A Clinical Investigation of Contralateral Neurological Symptom after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)Finite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Minimally Invasive Unilateral vs. Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation and Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Treatment of Multi-Segment Lumbar Degenerative Disorders.Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.Cost-utility of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and economic evaluation.Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Predictors of Long Term Opioid Use following Lumbar Fusion Surgery.The Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Posterior Approach Spinal Fusion in Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: The Current Evidence from Prospective Comparative Studies.Minimally Invasive versus Open Spine Surgery: What Does the Best Evidence Tell Us?Performance evaluation of MIND demons deformable registration of MR and CT images in spinal interventions.Surgeon, staff, and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: impact of 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation partially replacing conventional fluoroscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Short-Term Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Pedicle Screw with Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared with Conventional Trajectory.Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Feng Li et al. entitled "Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence" by Nai-Feng Tian, Yao-Sen Wu, Xiao-Lei Zhang, Hua-Zi Xu, Yong-Long CComment on Tian et al.: Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.True anteroposterior view pedicle screw insertion technique.Percutaneous posterior transdiscal oblique screw fixation with lateral interbody fusion: a radiological and cadaveric study.Minimally invasive versus open Transforaminal lumbar Interbody fusion in obese patients: a meta-analysis.[Minimally invasive extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-analysis of the Fusion Rates. What is the Optimal Graft Material?Fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of osteoconductive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes.Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Attractive Option for Select Failed Backs.
P2860
Q26998231-17CFD63C-8C34-4C0C-B93B-0B6870C7C842Q31115750-C5ED6F20-20DE-481F-88DA-2D6C64456ACDQ33592097-04E52FFF-DECE-4F74-A17E-11D21EAE713DQ33846241-07FDDB43-E2D0-43BB-B947-AF644684DE56Q34517572-A4ECF8DB-AA6D-4934-87C1-5A3314E7DA6AQ35003158-8D6B8F4C-EDD1-4222-A268-0B6E5712AAA1Q35397180-E43780EB-F81A-486A-B216-0E3D0BEAD3B2Q35660605-CE399D88-903A-4685-92D2-51F3332FA393Q35821502-87CAD47A-E5A8-4625-90AD-E0D23C4E9EB4Q35864080-60FD8EB6-E441-42AC-A5BD-07DAD427A21AQ36331760-8A1403EF-4948-42EE-B514-DFF304A4279EQ37185461-14732ADD-5BA5-4225-B401-45F4F53D05FFQ38392329-CC894BDD-6673-48A6-ACC7-CF2B2E24CEBFQ38551145-00D68004-8B4A-4498-8B72-3463C546C6CFQ38555061-6A626206-C514-4DD4-BFA7-E87839F641A0Q38927393-C164CCAD-5B58-4540-AAC8-7FE642236FC1Q38982790-6E1EC1D2-EFC5-4E70-85E6-5DD88AFB53F6Q39155996-C285E619-F0DE-4CA8-83E8-330CE899DAEBQ39218097-621D17E7-9B6F-40FC-88C3-BE2CBB9853D2Q39651986-6B54D98F-98CD-4F26-8CEB-D39DC82A5952Q41906241-A8EE8E45-298F-40B7-9B0B-45C3FE92E040Q42405185-F0328F73-EF43-4F78-9A65-8A5C66EADEB4Q42405202-180E1B6E-F2B2-4299-9089-DEB234DE76E1Q42430225-39287B67-8EC3-4FEA-BE51-562A7996A6F7Q44221430-2DDEF8B2-14BE-4E39-A8C5-A59BD5635144Q47726872-8AFB0D42-0BEE-4F3F-A923-A3CCED9E27DEQ49724732-F4F2FAB2-BB89-412A-8C43-5E7DC9A73768Q51051597-F7F332BF-8230-4100-8F4D-A2B3A9D1C315Q53006376-A29CC5CF-72CB-4B07-9495-A5FCBFE94197Q54941099-7D9E0F6B-41B3-42B1-8CA0-52CB5D4FB38B
P2860
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 10 April 2013
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Minimally invasive versus open ...... based on the current evidence
@en
Minimally invasive versus open ...... based on the current evidence.
@nl
type
label
Minimally invasive versus open ...... based on the current evidence
@en
Minimally invasive versus open ...... based on the current evidence.
@nl
prefLabel
Minimally invasive versus open ...... based on the current evidence
@en
Minimally invasive versus open ...... based on the current evidence.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Minimally invasive versus open ...... based on the current evidence
@en
P2093
Fang-Min Mao
Nai-Feng Tian
Xiao-Lei Zhang
Yao-Sen Wu
Yong-Long Chi
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00586-013-2747-Z
P577
2013-04-10T00:00:00Z