Litigation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evaluation of the Dutch arbitration system for medical malpractice.
about
Physicians' explanatory behaviours and legal liability in decided medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan.Safety measures during cholecystectomy: results of a nationwide survey.Biliary complications postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism, preventive measures, and approach to management: a review.Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions.The retrospective documentation of legal cases with bile duct injury that were submitted for consideration to İstanbul Forensic Medicine Institute by the courts between 2008-2012.Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.A comparison of medical litigation filed against obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery departments.Is routine intraoperative cholangiogram necessary in the twenty-first century? A national view.Medico-legal aspects of bile duct injuryMedicolegal costs of bile duct injuries incurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomyMedical malpractice claims in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a Dutch overview of 20 years.Quality of Life and Medico-Legal Implications Following Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injuries.Preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis, wrongful birth and wrongful life: a global view of bioethical and legal controversies.Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement.Association between physician explanatory behaviors and substandard care in adjudicated cases in Japan.Cost analysis and effectiveness comparing the routine use of intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography with fluoroscopic cholangiogram in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?[Intensive care capacities in Germany: provision and usage between 1991 and 2009].
P2860
Q33879081-818FA61C-17EF-4D0D-B34A-7A471DDE431FQ34975902-2BFDBDFD-13A1-4478-A248-6A20A92A68A8Q35070455-4D6188A1-A7D1-4F56-B631-FADF9E9E9BD9Q35124325-7A4EE7BC-6348-4ECF-928A-94D1E30C0439Q35233394-9B973219-3A09-4E48-A73B-E1469887441EQ35624381-73A47B8D-5095-441E-9FE2-59BB38330E2AQ35820506-BBDC4364-1D38-4BF6-8E46-B6CFCD75CA9BQ36060728-B099E097-0183-46D0-B065-50FD0C5DAD05Q36561022-4C2CDED4-1211-4DAB-B3E4-9506A88A5F98Q37231110-C89B6C07-E020-4329-A4CA-88FD7876BF7DQ38716365-62F1E640-0C7C-4402-B7A1-CC054887ECA1Q38915587-00DA74BD-0125-4C9D-B5E1-7FE3575D6450Q39127649-19BC76F9-D79D-41F2-B09F-31539E1E57EDQ41997506-59628799-4F25-4DC7-9F2B-A97A165F38BDQ42724666-D53B759D-76E3-4D18-89B6-36474175F815Q45921854-94E9E736-277A-4AA2-9A13-A829DFE6C702Q50152293-351FCFE1-6C93-4F58-B87A-21D36C557BD6Q52890055-B24C4714-CAB3-4F8E-95C9-125158C77271
P2860
Litigation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evaluation of the Dutch arbitration system for medical malpractice.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 29 October 2007
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Litigation after laparoscopic ...... ystem for medical malpractice.
@en
Litigation after laparoscopic ...... ystem for medical malpractice.
@nl
type
label
Litigation after laparoscopic ...... ystem for medical malpractice.
@en
Litigation after laparoscopic ...... ystem for medical malpractice.
@nl
prefLabel
Litigation after laparoscopic ...... ystem for medical malpractice.
@en
Litigation after laparoscopic ...... ystem for medical malpractice.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Litigation after laparoscopic ...... ystem for medical malpractice.
@en
P2093
Dirk J Gouma
Jan E Cremers
Olivier R Busch
Philip R de Reuver
Thomas M van Gulik
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2007.08.004
P577
2007-10-29T00:00:00Z