Norton, Waterlow and Braden scores: a review of the literature and a comparison between the scores and clinical judgement.
about
Education of healthcare professionals for preventing pressure ulcersRisk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcersRisk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcersIdentifying the right surface for the right patient at the right time: generation and content validation of an algorithm for support surface selectionDevelopment of the interRAI Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale (PURS) for use in long-term care and home care settings.Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care unitsDo pressure ulcer risk assessment scales improve clinical practice?Frequent manual repositioning and incidence of pressure ulcers among bed-bound elderly hip fracture patients.Rate of Pressure Ulcers in Intensive Units and General Wards of Iranian Hospitals and Methods for Their DetectionRisk Assessment Tool for Pressure Ulcer Development in Indian Surgical Wards.Preventing Pressure Ulcers: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial in Nursing Homes.Fabric-based pressure sensor array for decubitus ulcer monitoring.Low admission Norton scale scores are associated with falls long after rehabilitation in the elderly with hip fractures.Skin blood flow dynamics and its role in pressure ulcers.Pressure ulcers in palliative ward patients: hyponatremia and low blood pressure as indicators of risk.Risk factors for pressure ulcer development in critically Ill patients: a conceptual model to guide research.A review of PU risk assessment and prevention in Scandinavia, Iceland and Ireland (part II).A review of PU prevalence and incidence across Scandinavia, Iceland and Ireland (Part I).Accuracy of ultrasound, thermography and subepidermal moisture in predicting pressure ulcers: a systematic review.Pressure care practice and occupational therapy: findings of an exploratory study.Pressure injury prevention strategies in acute medical inpatients: an observational study.Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention practices: a cross-sectional comparative survey in Norway and Ireland.Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients.Prevalence of pressure ulcer and associated risk factors in middle- and older-aged medical inpatients in Norway.Pressure injury identification, measurement, coding, and reporting: Key challenges and opportunities.Evaluation of a multifactorial approach to reduce the prevalence of pressure injuries in regional Australian acute inpatient care settings.Reducing pressure ulcers in hip fracture patients.The art of noticing: essential to nursing practice.Admission Norton scale scores correlate with rehabilitation outcome and length in elderly patients following cerebrovascular accident.Friction and shear highly associated with pressure ulcers of residents in long-term care - Classification Tree Analysis (CHAID) of Braden items.Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale.
P2860
Q24186974-11827BD9-7C85-48F8-BF12-88BF0590192CQ24200569-92C32006-9C37-43A5-B18E-F0A4B3649EA0Q24242096-A047E445-0511-4AC3-8EA4-3F421751D7BAQ30301047-FAE2CE19-AE02-44BF-B7B6-B56C7C578098Q33696540-5E6A509D-149C-4A18-85F2-CE7D4E342064Q33702679-F24D9900-2DAA-4E72-BBA0-EEE7A1824C68Q34418053-83C63643-D92B-4C4C-BD99-62A1DDA6B5E0Q34686717-A485C040-4BE0-4D29-85E0-B25B59E56662Q35763279-A5C8A1C7-E15E-4A89-A9B9-E592F1D7BA35Q35908656-BE64905C-F4FF-4D29-A803-EABD091750BEQ36003458-658A6FAF-B9BF-4A63-AF86-48A67F0405C9Q36164936-90F5B1CF-5AD8-482D-96F9-35BC9626504BQ36343937-546B3E0B-0E4E-4929-82C7-674D9194B1FAQ36857810-2FE36742-E61D-48A0-BFC1-8FF9A922E648Q37551668-CBBE6387-BA51-4CAD-B2A4-AD182CEDB53BQ38003336-1E96D097-36A9-4E6F-896D-98249E4DCD63Q38127310-9DF372C3-803E-41B0-BD09-D6B252BFE1B2Q38155520-FAE02208-C56A-4B41-B570-1E1ECE485029Q38802287-1B98F212-A27A-4439-887F-B2902207C555Q39258516-C445682B-5F83-4473-9D69-5D33436CB384Q39734033-700001EF-41B5-4652-A2ED-3E2BABFA9EFBQ40328025-B772550B-A577-41D0-A6DD-680A28677275Q41028317-05611276-F02A-4660-8F88-DC57DF60D740Q46156091-BCF797D2-A3AF-40C9-A32B-DD82A1696F7CQ47268458-B76FCB48-4618-42D4-AAB2-669B963FA5EFQ47635372-58496E08-78A1-4239-9AED-FD00533B9F5CQ48612361-0914A039-2A16-4743-A41E-1942ED87FB31Q50642341-101C17D6-BCBF-4CDF-AA2A-33F6287F34C7Q50760526-3F274EB8-9ADC-405B-B16B-BF777A7146E6Q51151894-845E897E-21E5-4CA7-8122-406C1C82EA43Q55114574-792EEFFD-B026-477B-A868-89DF2C58C319
P2860
Norton, Waterlow and Braden scores: a review of the literature and a comparison between the scores and clinical judgement.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on March 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Norton, Waterlow and Braden sc ...... scores and clinical judgement.
@en
Norton, Waterlow and Braden sc ...... scores and clinical judgement.
@nl
type
label
Norton, Waterlow and Braden sc ...... scores and clinical judgement.
@en
Norton, Waterlow and Braden sc ...... scores and clinical judgement.
@nl
prefLabel
Norton, Waterlow and Braden sc ...... scores and clinical judgement.
@en
Norton, Waterlow and Braden sc ...... scores and clinical judgement.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Norton, Waterlow and Braden sc ...... scores and clinical judgement.
@en
P2093
Denis Anthony
Mohammad Saleh
Panos Papanikolaou
Sam Parboteeah
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1365-2702.2007.02029.X
P577
2008-03-01T00:00:00Z