Is the posner reaction time test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke?
about
Assessment and rehabilitation of neglect using virtual reality: a systematic reviewShifting attention in viewer- and object-based reference frames after unilateral brain injury.A simple measure of neglect severityResting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke.Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function?Large-scale changes in network interactions as a physiological signature of spatial neglect.Predictors of return to driving after stroke.Spatial neglect and attention networks.Triple dissociation of attention networks in stroke according to lesion locationNeglect and extinction depend greatly on task demands: a review.Dynamic assessment of visual neglect: The Mobility Assessment Course as a diagnostic tool.Normalization of network connectivity in hemispatial neglect recovery.Hemispatial neglect: computer-based testing allows more sensitive quantification of attentional disorders and recovery and might lead to better evaluation of rehabilitation.Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.Speed impairs attending on the left: comparing attentional asymmetries for neglect patients in speeded and unspeeded cueing tasks.Unveiling residual, spontaneous recovery from subtle hemispatial neglect three years after stroke.The Mobility Assessment Course for the Diagnosis of Spatial Neglect: Taking a Step Forward?"Nonspatial" Attentional Deficits Interact with Spatial Position in Neglect.Differential white matter involvement associated with distinct visuospatial deficits after right hemisphere stroke.Modelling the differential effects of prisms on perception and action in neglect.
P2860
Q26785339-DCF3C3FF-9604-4209-84CE-005C47C4F307Q30467181-4DBFD33D-D0CA-4287-BEB2-6326B8DFD1DEQ33569419-D5443A54-15F2-41B6-8899-9ED175151975Q34081913-52673918-D1AB-46AB-AEB1-723AD16CD42CQ34194670-5806B688-767C-4B62-BAEE-E2B92F571721Q34556037-D7D34895-69F2-4D27-BA43-73221CC9E22AQ36947450-1475AD4A-777C-4B39-915C-6D2367534E04Q37215622-6B004E0C-8585-4A10-B5D3-A92DEB15E512Q37536737-879F7AA3-3C82-4B1F-B8CE-F974CF556561Q38028469-BAD8A898-F10D-42D0-B534-748EE27A6196Q38787291-F2293D68-529F-4DF1-9CA1-C8CBB78DCB8EQ39699140-D43F617B-A132-4539-B2B4-89479C2C89C8Q40248534-C404E150-462B-44C5-A416-4EF7F904C7A3Q41046617-D3D15CD7-0F03-4EDE-ABE4-46ADA494827CQ41871845-7788823B-2668-4078-98DB-A6DE9EEBDD5BQ42020485-3599CAC0-1D56-41BE-A7E4-B45BDB0B478CQ47345881-4CC43C7A-50A8-4511-8A8F-A34A3C93B797Q48336928-DD7EB1C2-A64E-458C-8DA1-513F7E826C88Q48360786-AA95C7BA-179C-441E-8137-1E162812F296Q48445322-5BFAF55B-8531-4258-AB80-D002C1C73380
P2860
Is the posner reaction time test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke?
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on December 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Is the posner reaction time te ...... t in acute and chronic stroke?
@en
Is the posner reaction time te ...... t in acute and chronic stroke?
@nl
type
label
Is the posner reaction time te ...... t in acute and chronic stroke?
@en
Is the posner reaction time te ...... t in acute and chronic stroke?
@nl
prefLabel
Is the posner reaction time te ...... t in acute and chronic stroke?
@en
Is the posner reaction time te ...... t in acute and chronic stroke?
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Is the posner reaction time te ...... t in acute and chronic stroke?
@en
P2093
Ayelet Sapir
Giovanni d'Avossa
Gordon L Shulman
Jennifer Rengachary
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.APMR.2009.07.014
P577
2009-12-01T00:00:00Z