Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review.
about
A Systematic Review of Rhubarb (a Traditional Chinese Medicine) Used for the Treatment of Experimental SepsisUse of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Environmental Health Epidemiology: a Systematic Review and Comparison with Guidelines.The Navigation Guide - evidence-based medicine meets environmental health: systematic review of human evidence for PFOA effects on fetal growthMeta-analyses of animal studies: an introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcareExposure to Mixtures of Metals and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Multidisciplinary Review Using an Adverse Outcome Pathway FrameworkA proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicalsApplication of the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology to the evidence for developmental and reproductive toxicity of triclosanNonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysisPain and Laboratory Animals: Publication Practices for Better Data Reproducibility and Better Animal WelfareA primer on systematic reviews in toxicology.Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating ecotoxicity Data (CRED): comparison and perception of the Klimisch and CRED methods for evaluating reliability and relevance of ecotoxicity studiesRethinking Meta-Analysis: Applications for Air Pollution Data and Beyond.Can animal data translate to innovations necessary for a new era of patient-centred and individualised healthcare? Bias in preclinical animal researchTumor Cells Growth and Survival Time with the Ketogenic Diet in Animal Models: A Systematic ReviewEvidence-based decision-making in infectious diseases epidemiology, prevention and control: matching research questions to study designs and quality appraisal tools.The relationship between study sponsorship, risks of bias, and research outcomes in atrazine exposure studies conducted in non-human animals: Systematic review and meta-analysis.The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomesThe Navigation Guide - evidence-based medicine meets environmental health: systematic review of nonhuman evidence for PFOA effects on fetal growthThe Navigation Guide - evidence-based medicine meets environmental health: integration of animal and human evidence for PFOA effects on fetal growth.The usefulness of systematic reviews of animal experiments for the design of preclinical and clinical studies.A path forward in the debate over health impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals.The Relationship between Risk of Bias Criteria, Research Outcomes, and Study Sponsorship in a Cohort of Preclinical Thiazolidinedione Animal Studies: A Meta-AnalysisSYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies.Systematic reviews of animal studies; missing link in translational research?Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysisEfficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Assessing dose-response relationships for endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs): a focus on non-monotonicityOsteogenic Potential of Dental Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Preclinical Studies: A Systematic Review Using Modified ARRIVE and CONSORT Guidelines.Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for PreventionHow credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards.The Emergence of Systematic Review in Toxicology.Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist in Animal Models of Stroke: an Update.Impact of high iron intake on cognition and neurodegeneration in humans and in animal models: a systematic review.The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria: Krauth et al. Respond.Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of animal studies: omission of well-established methods.Bias detection: study identifies instruments for evaluating animal studies.Research wranglers: initiatives to improve reproducibility of study findings.A valuable contribution toward adopting systematic review in environmental health.Reporting of results from animal studies.
P2860
Q26785392-180456CD-3F53-4E54-98E4-104CC017A12AQ26800622-E14156DD-4541-400D-90E6-85B892FD1918Q26851809-A114BDDC-73CC-4EFC-BBFC-D5ED041A3D3CQ26858818-FA3BBED8-58AB-44E5-85EA-758AE467EBE0Q28080575-6C3EF949-CD48-4546-B5E5-AE93F38096E4Q28384100-87C76B0F-F345-40A7-BA1E-B254BEBD0A2DQ28384535-3C32224A-028E-4396-A201-D1F8A5FB682AQ28538894-40CB7F77-3857-4703-9528-0DD36B73F7A5Q28602878-91A4A3DE-5E54-4DC4-A8DE-BED6271BA4E9Q30234472-14A60799-3E1B-45B8-B27D-4532E6202102Q30817451-271DEDCD-64C3-48BA-A677-3E5D3AB9F814Q30950908-9FF88866-1064-4228-8A0D-B716CE3A99CEQ30983045-E3192A7F-CF7A-4A00-B7E6-0E8CEF0B6635Q33743850-1B87C794-CBE3-40E0-BACB-C3AD2D56736EQ33777628-ADAB90FA-402E-47AF-B6C9-C2737D6698A7Q34045690-9453CC16-DB45-413C-B22F-FF5CBF0FC379Q34275302-CCBA6A34-06AB-42F2-BCB3-96F114897F66Q34275308-76536EB4-30A8-4717-BA96-603DAABC8FA9Q34275367-6ED6D4C5-EAE5-44A3-97FA-4DBBF122EFEEQ34772973-4D3C8379-1B2A-42DA-B876-35C85ED8930CQ34981379-50206A56-7C4E-4A52-8985-4B001C70395EQ35012566-8DE25904-D552-4FA0-A70F-24510358653BQ35130894-98269021-C996-45CA-885C-68FDCE37D575Q35132083-AC6BBB1D-8C27-47A7-ABA0-6E66AFBA5362Q35158628-1445682A-8B4C-46CE-8D95-4A24A03AA0BAQ35443427-13E20F82-EEEB-41E3-9366-ABD447DF319EQ35632704-BD0A83A8-F673-4700-87D3-A3E0BE7D59CDQ35730520-0F8539BF-8E2C-4BAB-98B7-5ECAB9A9CDD6Q36456218-298C3F5E-06BB-4F1E-85E4-C42718F692E4Q36994018-A8C607C3-DDD3-4B53-A850-43D58A96E5EFQ37041883-F51C92C1-1939-4B2D-8D34-2B0D6E9EF037Q37239490-8BC1AFBD-D49C-44A4-8AE6-E6CA6851FCB3Q38785723-C55692DD-8FF1-4945-9F42-0EDB306CEB91Q38952676-A785C5BA-DEC7-4B7C-B844-B656BB38DE42Q42415967-21AD7A67-3338-4C7C-9729-F57C7DF2CB00Q42415968-9F52F50C-4308-491D-9BE4-957421B479F9Q42586454-A6DBC4D3-CF4C-4639-9EE0-648AFD1D4C05Q42719347-CEBEF3FC-AD8B-46C6-8FC9-D1158EFE781DQ42746830-8A9EEA55-DBDD-45EB-838B-123BCB0BC20CQ42837023-F0B53ED3-5FD9-49C2-9B9E-C9BBD49E5DDB
P2860
Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 14 June 2013
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Instruments for assessing risk ...... studies: a systematic review.
@en
Instruments for assessing risk ...... studies: a systematic review.
@nl
type
label
Instruments for assessing risk ...... studies: a systematic review.
@en
Instruments for assessing risk ...... studies: a systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
Instruments for assessing risk ...... studies: a systematic review.
@en
Instruments for assessing risk ...... studies: a systematic review.
@nl
P2860
P921
P356
P1476
Instruments for assessing risk ...... l studies: a systematic review
@en
P2093
David Krauth
P2860
P304
P356
10.1289/EHP.1206389
P577
2013-06-14T00:00:00Z