Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.

Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37182471
Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisInterspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A reviewTransforaminal endoscopic lumbar decompression & foraminoplasty: a 10 year prospective survivability outcome study of the treatment of foraminal stenosis and failed back surgery.Comparison of the efficacy and safety between interspinous process distraction device and open decompression surgery in treating lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta analysis.Posterior dynamic stabilization in the lumbar spine - 24 months results of a prospective clinical and radiological study with an interspinous distraction deviceThe Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2013.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2013.The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy.The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Do we have the right PROMs for measuring outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery?Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study.Long-term results with percutaneous interspinous process devices in the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication.A prospective randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of dynamic stabilisation of the lumbar spine with the Wallis ligament.Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP-a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies.Interspinous process devices for treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
P2860

Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37182471
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 27 April 2013
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Percutaneous interspinous spac ...... l outcome and quality of life.
@en
Percutaneous interspinous spac ...... l outcome and quality of life.
@nl
type
label
Percutaneous interspinous spac ...... l outcome and quality of life.
@en
Percutaneous interspinous spac ...... l outcome and quality of life.
@nl
prefLabel
Percutaneous interspinous spac ...... l outcome and quality of life.
@en
Percutaneous interspinous spac ...... l outcome and quality of life.
@nl
P1433
P1476
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P577
P698
P921
P932
P356
P1433
P1476
Percutaneous interspinous spac ...... l outcome and quality of life.
@en
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P577
P698
P921
P932