Can we derive an 'exchange rate' between descriptive and preference-based outcome measures for stroke? Results from the transfer to utility (TTU) technique
about
Use of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to estimate EQ-5D utility scores from EORTC QLQ data in myeloma for use in cost-effectiveness analysis.Cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacements for the Australian population with osteoarthritis: discrete-event simulation model.Predicting EQ-5D utility scores from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in coronary artery disease: a mapping algorithm using a Bayesian framework.Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led education and psychosocial programme for patients with chronic heart failure and their partnersPreferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement.Mapping health outcome measures from a stroke registry to EQ-5D weights.Evaluation of content on EQ-5D as compared to disease-specific utility measures.The MAPS Reporting Statement for Studies Mapping onto Generic Preference-Based Outcome Measures: Explanation and Elaboration.Use of an Australian quality of life tool in patients with COPD.A comparison of direct and indirect methods for the estimation of health utilities from clinical outcomes.Review and critical appraisal of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database and application of the MAPS statement.Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: the MAPS statement.PREFERRED REPORTING ITEMS FOR STUDIES MAPPING ONTO PREFERENCE-BASED OUTCOME MEASURES: THE MAPS STATEMENT.Preferred Reporting Items for Studies Mapping onto Preference-Based Outcome Measures: The MAPS Statement.Preferred Reporting Items for Studies Mapping onto Preference-Based Outcome Measures: The MAPS Statement.
P2860
Q30912145-B38D6CEA-4BC8-41EB-8D34-7415AF5DD477Q34038307-6EAEEFB6-0678-4204-BA06-59A5AE73BF8CQ34625565-7B20B7ED-E24F-40F7-8B89-E98E414AF69CQ35657790-CA7174B0-FDDE-4AA2-A2ED-21209B2A582EQ35908125-F1C6ACDE-D28E-4AEF-AEA6-0113A98E4202Q36689858-EB5690AE-1807-493C-A075-46EDA3A315AEQ38021389-9AE926B1-66F3-4AC0-BD11-C27C655F0CB5Q38558706-5BEA740A-F052-4EC7-8583-AA9331E65955Q39558803-B2443B25-E094-4DBE-92A3-E1FC4658F2EFQ45585376-F813D1F9-D17E-4F87-9341-9D779DDEF723Q50057926-16288055-AD72-4DC5-81EA-0B1794620F4CQ51024067-5BB95DEB-C230-44F2-A309-D8F44C6F0F39Q53397964-6C74DFA3-7028-49F1-9F81-89362767C439Q53399248-3EE4B673-815C-412E-97E2-E4A1F5A3955BQ54901654-523C4FFD-1C0C-4FA5-977F-C218917B52C3
P2860
Can we derive an 'exchange rate' between descriptive and preference-based outcome measures for stroke? Results from the transfer to utility (TTU) technique
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 17 April 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Can we derive an 'exchange rat ...... fer to utility (TTU) technique
@en
Can we derive an 'exchange rat ...... s from the transfer to utility
@nl
type
label
Can we derive an 'exchange rat ...... fer to utility (TTU) technique
@en
Can we derive an 'exchange rat ...... s from the transfer to utility
@nl
prefLabel
Can we derive an 'exchange rat ...... fer to utility (TTU) technique
@en
Can we derive an 'exchange rat ...... s from the transfer to utility
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Can we derive an 'exchange rat ...... fer to utility (TTU) technique
@en
P2093
Jonathan Sturm
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1477-7525-7-33
P577
2009-04-17T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1022648213