A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: is longer better?
about
The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository DevelopmentEmerging issues in paediatric health research consent forms in Canada: working towards best practicesParticipants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing.A randomized trial comparing concise and standard consent forms in the START trial.Research into a functional cure for HIV in neonates: the need for ethical foresight.A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and resultsImproved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients' understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settings.Improved participants' understanding in a healthy volunteer study using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled study.Informed consent for phase I oncology trials: form, substance and signature.Anticipated Ethics and Regulatory Challenges in PCORnet: The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network.Participants' Understanding of Informed Consent for Biobanking: A Systematic Review.Permission form synopses to improve parents' understanding of research: a randomized trialA novel metadata management model to capture consent for record linkage in longitudinal research studies.How well informed is the informed consent for cancer clinical trials?Evidence-Based Strategies for Shortening Informed Consent Forms in Clinical Research.What information and the extent of information research participants need in informed consent forms: a multi-country survey
P2860
Q27323895-E94717D3-F9A9-4EEB-9D64-17D4C3BF2F8AQ28708977-CF5759DC-DD4D-4921-B5D0-83F3722ED18EQ30685664-E04FC23D-A4C5-4F2B-931D-97E823AFA76EQ33606384-D75DFA1B-B218-45B2-AF1E-BEA4FD720314Q34449423-B9D31D19-8B8D-4625-BBC5-FF8192711EC0Q35132491-768BC43A-F402-442A-A2C7-544726936CD8Q36243617-B046EBF8-5F57-4A5D-81D6-A8A25E65A945Q36688457-543ACFE6-AC2A-4BBE-8D93-21ED22E0569FQ37701153-06A03B16-CE82-4853-80BA-2FB3BEB07E4CQ38550799-579287BC-6CD3-4885-BAF3-D1C81395D8B7Q39458929-EDBA4A0E-944A-4BED-BACF-FEEF5137C2DCQ41661818-7431352B-9A69-4E73-A2C3-6C4C75D7E3A0Q47651934-87C7204C-2CA5-4635-B31E-90908FACD8ECQ53085398-3BFF4077-200C-4643-A33C-DFD388B6074BQ53676576-66FBFBAD-BE9A-492B-B6F5-47CBCA16C54EQ57191340-460D7EBF-A8D0-4094-B131-29CBA88D6C63
P2860
A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: is longer better?
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 24 March 2012
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
A randomized controlled trial ...... ohort study: is longer better?
@en
A randomized controlled trial ...... ohort study: is longer better?
@nl
type
label
A randomized controlled trial ...... ohort study: is longer better?
@en
A randomized controlled trial ...... ohort study: is longer better?
@nl
prefLabel
A randomized controlled trial ...... ohort study: is longer better?
@en
A randomized controlled trial ...... ohort study: is longer better?
@nl
P2093
P2860
P921
P356
P1476
A randomized controlled trial ...... ohort study: is longer better?
@en
P2093
Kenji Matsui
Reidar K Lie
Yoshikuni Kita
P2860
P304
P356
10.2188/JEA.JE20110104
P577
2012-03-24T00:00:00Z