Leg wound infections following greater saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive vein harvesting versus conventional vein harvesting.
about
Triclosan-coated sutures do not reduce leg wound infections after coronary artery bypass grafting.Comparative results of endoscopic and open methods of vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized parallel-group trialEndoscopic vein harvesting: technique, outcomes, concerns & controversies.Is it safe to perform endoscopic vein harvest?Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Mashhad.Mid-term outcomes for Endoscopic versus Open Vein Harvest: a case control study.
P2860
Leg wound infections following greater saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive vein harvesting versus conventional vein harvesting.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 24 September 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Leg wound infections following ...... conventional vein harvesting.
@en
Leg wound infections following ...... conventional vein harvesting.
@nl
type
label
Leg wound infections following ...... conventional vein harvesting.
@en
Leg wound infections following ...... conventional vein harvesting.
@nl
prefLabel
Leg wound infections following ...... conventional vein harvesting.
@en
Leg wound infections following ...... conventional vein harvesting.
@nl
P2860
P31
P356
P1476
Leg wound infections following ...... conventional vein harvesting.
@en
P2093
James F Reed
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/1534734608324172
P577
2008-09-24T00:00:00Z