Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
about
Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-AnalysesHealth and illness in a connected world: how might sharing experiences on the internet affect people's health?Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review.Development of a decision aid to inform patients' and families' renal replacement therapy selection decisions.The value of personalised risk information: a qualitative study of the perceptions of patients with prostate cancer.Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence.Characterizing donation behavior from psychophysiological indices of narrative experienceDeveloping and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy.Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Decision aids for randomised controlled trials: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders' views.Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences.Prescriptive scientific narratives for communicating usable science.Health information on the Internet: gold mine or minefield?The National Vaccine Advisory Committee: reducing patient and provider barriers to maternal immunizations: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on June 11, 2014Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women."It Was the Best Decision of My Life": a thematic content analysis of former medical tourists' patient testimonialsUnderstanding narrative effects: the impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American womenIt only takes once: The absent-exempt heuristic and reactions to comparison-based sexual risk information.Supplementing factual information with patient narratives in the cancer screening context: a qualitative study of acceptability and preferencesNarratives and images used by public communication campaigns addressing social determinants of health and health disparities.Effective vaccine communication during the disneyland measles outbreak.Peer support for CKD patients and carers: overcoming barriers and facilitating access.Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: randomised controlled trialNarrative means to preventative ends: a narrative engagement framework for designing prevention interventions.Imagined futures: how experiential knowledge of disability affects parents' decision making about fetal abnormalityPresenting life with cystic fibrosis: a Q-methodological approach to developing balanced, experience-based prenatal screening information.The effect of patient narratives on information search in a web-based breast cancer decision aid: an eye-tracking study.Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions.The role of information in supporting self-care in vascular conditions: a conceptual and empirical review.Audio-video decision support for patients: the documentary genré as a basis for decision aids.Expanded carrier screening: what determines intended participation and can this be influenced by message framing and narrative information?Effect of Message Format and Content on Attitude Accessibility Regarding Sexually Transmitted Infections.Characterizing Online Narratives About Colonoscopy Experiences: Comparing Colon Cancer "Screeners" Versus "Survivors".What makes a message real? The effects of perceived realism of alcohol- and drug-related messages on personal probability estimation.All stories are not alike: a purpose-, content-, and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids.Hospital Quality Reporting in the United States: Does Report Card Design and Incorporation of Patient Narrative Comments Affect Hospital Choice?Breaking Narrative Ground: Innovative Methods for Rigorously Eliciting and Assessing Patient Narratives.When the model fits the frame: the impact of regulatory fit on efficacy appraisal and persuasion in health communication.Enhancing the effects of a narrative message through experiential information processing: An experimental study.Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions: a simulation of an online patient social network.
P2860
Q26774311-0AD70386-3DBB-4DC5-B1B0-98EDCBFD5523Q26998518-C3A39DE6-AD46-413B-B75B-2C24210CEDE9Q27690705-647CE6FD-2256-45BB-90FD-FD6B3F84DE31Q30533697-1BD36271-176A-4EFF-9CC5-66D5A35DA690Q30544850-671CDAF0-BE46-4AF9-8008-7EF746649B18Q30579883-F9614FB2-207B-4840-AA8E-BDA72DE4ADAFQ30662938-6C4C9D35-3AF3-476F-B57A-501B9EFA7AA8Q33513759-E976B72D-FF67-48BB-AD64-84D9C29AF7DCQ33661913-601E26AF-DFEE-4566-823A-EF219B91FBEBQ34071784-BC0C54CE-ABFB-4807-A5D1-F91A56FCADC5Q34280175-09D2735C-D41A-41F8-ADBB-B298B4823E97Q34280187-F04FBB9C-E28C-40D4-B8A4-45849F914935Q34420049-EFB32B28-907E-4F55-BCE0-DA79FF9C6E38Q34576732-F2E17688-F25E-4E15-BAC6-E6C0B03B12D1Q35135848-7B661DFA-D282-4438-9596-8F4E231FC1C6Q35547654-0E5B9A2E-8F4A-4FBC-9E92-0C35F89C55FBQ35552331-7103F987-B5D1-45C1-99F4-08B8A18FA364Q35769306-785BAFD7-EB4D-4BD5-BD94-B42E3873791DQ36532491-E7000F6E-02A0-4D61-A452-A5AE974B6C95Q36538616-CE0245D0-315C-4C70-8823-A436869E8DD9Q36995477-41B304AF-436D-416C-8D74-0B413011497FQ37185551-F517864C-7C1F-4D16-979D-6D9F2689B083Q37206491-B288A585-C8E7-4DE9-A243-7A5C7102BEA3Q37227873-42703AF9-1961-4DC6-996A-876E4AB5BBF1Q37332794-B5A0CCE9-8224-40C2-842B-2F272D4CBB39Q37333590-9B44AE9B-D783-4848-B1CA-6CC59D919F03Q37420432-987A59AC-2B70-4BA1-8E6A-EE7CE86FAB56Q37444577-EC388AB7-ED3F-4464-A93B-B9111F55589CQ37821079-4889F8B1-F6EB-4E7A-9C07-14BCDFDFA13AQ37950055-F27F1DDB-19D7-4C9C-8CEC-A72506393741Q38673303-29E9D031-3599-47D3-9B1B-3485D717CF3CQ38812413-F5F0517E-4DFA-48D9-9492-8A53FF2504DBQ38994367-53A1EE31-EC01-42D5-B989-B58F312FC207Q39471053-869E24BC-36F1-4B73-A3F0-530444222DE6Q39536552-A4C4F8CA-FE60-4134-946E-B64A975CE552Q39669424-B27D32D8-7D1F-47DC-8CE4-F63184AF111DQ39812418-D4CB463C-233B-448C-A72A-FB9DEC6A71CFQ41438154-2AA72416-93C1-4F11-81DA-6940B68F4707Q41681714-F65E073E-3415-4BDD-BC67-0CE99A1D5B80Q44167488-BF82D0CF-10F7-438C-8DA8-0BF43AB0F179
P2860
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 24 October 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@en
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@en-gb
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@nl
type
label
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@en
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@en-gb
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@en
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@en-gb
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@nl
P1476
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
@en
P2093
Andrew Mooney
Anna Winterbottom
P304
P356
10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2008.09.037
P407
P577
2008-10-24T00:00:00Z