Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice.
about
Prevention of prematurity by single embryo transfer.Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer.Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?The future of set (single embryo transfer) in the United StatesConversion from assisted reproductive technology to intrauterine insemination in low responders: is it advantageous?Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth.Decreased gonadotropin requirements in once daily compared to twice daily administration: a prospective, randomized studyThe prevalence of genuine empty follicle syndrome.The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfersNumber of supernumerary vitrified blastocysts is positively correlated with implantation and live birth in single-blastocyst embryo transfers.Influences on endometrial development during intrauterine insemination: clinical experience of 2,929 patients with unexplained infertility.Can prematurity risk in twin pregnancies after in vitro fertilization be predicted? A retrospective study.Establishment of trophectoderm and inner cell mass lineages in the mouse embryoOptimizing the number of embryos to transfer on day 5: two should be the limit.Bilateral tubal and intrauterine pregnancies diagnosed at laparoscopy.Factors predicting double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology: implications for elective single embryo transferDouble trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned?The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction.Morbid obesity and pregnancy outcomes after single blastocyst transfer: a retrospective, North American study.What can we learn from a decade of promoting safe embryo transfer practices? A comparative analysis of policies and outcomes in the UK and Australia, 2001-2010.Elective single embryo transfer- the power of one.Prevalence of unsuspected uterine cavity abnormalities diagnosed by office hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization.Equivalency of In vitro fertilization Success Rates in Elective Single Blastocyst Transfer and Elective Double Blastocyst Transfer: An Example of Equivalence Methodology in Clinical Reproductive Health.
P2860
Q30402236-843FAA32-D9F9-496D-B400-353F098A4C17Q34126215-E5CDB089-2E1B-4591-9B30-10E22A23F50BQ34199329-E0F08E3B-7EEC-481D-80B2-173C4D53E427Q34299297-E0ACB5C3-269E-4CCC-8BE2-ED028531D361Q34454347-95EE9BF0-D6AF-4C12-8C60-AA08D49536F0Q35561404-778D16B5-3518-4A90-BA3A-BDB0E513DB9FQ35689045-28B29001-CD7C-4E32-960C-25FE18F9E061Q35845584-EDAB74A7-BF9C-4188-A02A-29D157AC379EQ36620528-D2FAB15D-0A09-4383-A77D-3C103109844FQ36815681-D13E5B5F-8997-4C73-A53B-30E97480C55FQ36828940-FB57A425-FA42-4241-89D7-E7405F3CAF39Q37139490-F4D21639-4C64-4899-A50C-F56074690955Q37460704-E01F24CF-3A68-4E45-8139-DD0ABF7B6542Q37500341-0FB6DAB9-79F8-45F6-B81B-94BA6CBD7361Q37720448-EF0D3D71-2CAF-497A-9945-93131F0470B4Q38250276-207C9335-D28D-4088-8E17-9855A3703C86Q38896819-23730850-D344-41F7-BEE9-ADD32621AF68Q39024784-F9602D71-E23D-4FFB-8540-E6CEB78DF8AFQ39093522-BB1A660D-94DF-4261-A3BB-C4A1EBA923C4Q43476409-B6FEB854-9344-4BE4-BBD9-FC5107648208Q47439518-0F9CEBA9-1C1E-4D82-A3DC-2BFE80199FC7Q50490839-07CE5F31-F719-422C-97DF-C5BB59F472E3Q50934638-DF9C9A51-FFD6-456D-BB94-195ADF4B64B0Q51765844-43917515-7687-4B94-B7C0-282EEF48A269Q54984577-7974D398-30DD-456A-AFB1-90EAF6639422
P2860
Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 31 October 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Elective single embryo transfe ...... ment method on patient choice.
@en
Elective single embryo transfe ...... ment method on patient choice.
@nl
type
label
Elective single embryo transfe ...... ment method on patient choice.
@en
Elective single embryo transfe ...... ment method on patient choice.
@nl
prefLabel
Elective single embryo transfe ...... ment method on patient choice.
@en
Elective single embryo transfe ...... ment method on patient choice.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Elective single embryo transfe ...... ment method on patient choice.
@en
P2093
James R Graham
Kevin S Richter
Nicole K Banks
Robert J Stillman
P304
P356
10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2008.09.023
P407
P577
2008-10-31T00:00:00Z