Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.
about
A Prospective Evaluation of Shared Decision-making Regarding Analgesics Selection for Older Emergency Department Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Pain.Development and Pilot Testing of an Encounter Tool for Shared Decision Making About the Treatment of Graves' DiseasePsychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysisShared decision-making in antihypertensive therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trialProtocol for a pre-implementation and post-implementation study on shared decision-making in the surgical treatment of women with early-stage breast cancerDutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary CareShared Decision Making and the Use of Decision Aids.Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies-A systematic review.Shared decision-making behaviours in health professionals: a systematic review of studies based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire.The mediating role of spirituality (meaning, peace, faith) between psychological distress and mental adjustment in cancer patients.Psychometric properties of the German version of Observer OPTION5.The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review.
P2860
Q30277816-74144C5F-5CB4-4775-B781-FE3724E686CCQ30679626-D6C551EF-0D70-4D23-AD63-FA32CAF34FF7Q33592524-B2F02DFF-A9B0-4925-B141-ADDECAFD775EQ34984885-D981F786-72A8-4B9B-9DFD-EF1A75F7FA04Q35277997-7C5E503B-35D8-4942-8004-8CACAE6497F8Q35685350-45FA9A27-89EF-4D97-BE9C-47059B0F5D61Q36266734-DC165802-05BD-4EFD-8F1C-BA1001C66DACQ36328294-03FFAFDF-1A7C-43F8-83AB-5012E290BAF4Q37333337-CA3436B7-4EAD-4333-99CF-839E57D70C63Q42646428-2F20B324-7BF3-4096-BE5F-4A5579DEC056Q47565090-AE37B223-2EB1-4C78-B076-3EEBD890FA44Q47640966-55073D52-D4CA-47B1-BC52-67A6659022DAQ49980315-4BB76404-67F2-487D-8BCC-7FC016A3BEA8
P2860
Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparing the nine-item Shared ...... establish convergent validity.
@en
Comparing the nine-item Shared ...... establish convergent validity.
@nl
type
label
Comparing the nine-item Shared ...... establish convergent validity.
@en
Comparing the nine-item Shared ...... establish convergent validity.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparing the nine-item Shared ...... establish convergent validity.
@en
Comparing the nine-item Shared ...... establish convergent validity.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Comparing the nine-item Shared ...... establish convergent validity.
@en
P2093
Isabelle Scholl
Jörg Dirmaier
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/HEX.12022
P577
2012-11-26T00:00:00Z