Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
about
Enhancing HIV vaccine trial consent preparedness among street drug usersNational Human Research Ethics: A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and SwedenStakeholder views of ethical guidance regarding prevention and care in HIV vaccine trials.Theoretical model of critical issues in informed consent in HIV vaccine trialsThe Myth of Community Differences as the Cause of Variations Among IRBs.Reviewing HIV-Related Research in Emerging Economies: The Role of Government Reviewing Agencies.Linguistic and Cultural Challenges in Communication and Translation in US-Sponsored HIV Prevention Research in Emerging EconomiesAssessing Institutional Ethics Committees in India Using the IRB-RAT.The reporting of IRB review in journal articles presenting HIV research conducted in the developing worldHIV/AIDS research conducted in the developing world and sponsored by the developed world: reporting of research ethics committee review in two countries.US IRBs confronting research in the developing world.Blending genetics and sociocultural historical inquiry: ethics, culture, and human subjects protection in international cross cultural research.Payment of egg donors in stem cell research in the USA.Peruvian Female Sex Workers' Ethical Perspectives on Their Participation in an HPV Vaccine Clinical TrialEthical and practical challenges in implementing informed consent in HIV/AIDS clinical trials in developing or resource-limited countries.Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.
P2860
Q30227101-9EA4E645-4127-45CB-AED3-4D7E257EE107Q30394152-5F862442-CF65-42E5-BC5E-1F409326A561Q30584402-91B16D6D-A708-4DE2-823E-1ED07C2CA865Q34005683-6CD49C22-AFAF-4B01-A590-FF3D87CE6859Q34275033-524CBA8B-244D-4606-8ACB-562A237F27E7Q35589584-2CC195BD-0EA5-49F4-AA2C-2CB15C25A02FQ35726024-676A380D-2592-4836-8589-1FC6212F3C13Q36086675-69778357-6F51-42F6-ABC8-E4F01E9989D3Q36282580-EECFB7FC-E6FB-46F4-B754-DCAE4ED49B47Q36282584-429F99F7-0F33-4035-AC9B-EB47991EEBBEQ36282588-27659F21-66BD-4BD3-BDCA-54DFEF58A736Q36645319-8C43FA43-258E-4296-B287-EEBED2BF81ACQ36887108-D46B68E1-6D0C-4CEA-94BB-326BE66C6CE7Q37364798-04D337B7-ABFF-446E-AF67-1030FCAE8480Q37638292-9486626E-7CFF-4ADB-9A6B-7FAD1F35EA64Q38394945-F3D0FF8D-032F-4E0B-B1EA-0C49DF15EEA0
P2860
Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on December 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Views of the process and conte ...... an research ethics committees.
@en
Views of the process and conte ...... an research ethics committees.
@nl
type
label
Views of the process and conte ...... an research ethics committees.
@en
Views of the process and conte ...... an research ethics committees.
@nl
prefLabel
Views of the process and conte ...... an research ethics committees.
@en
Views of the process and conte ...... an research ethics committees.
@nl
P2860
P921
P1433
P1476
Views of the process and conte ...... an research ethics committees.
@en
P2093
Robert Klitzman
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1471-8847.2007.00189.X
P577
2008-12-01T00:00:00Z