US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey.
about
Screening for breast cancer with mammographyConsequences of false-positive screening mammogramsBreast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography.Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment.The effect of information about overdetection of breast cancer on women's decision-making about mammography screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model.Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriersThe ethics of how to manage incidental findings.Women's attitudes to false positive mammography results. A formerly clueless patient responds.Effect of screening programme on mortality from breast cancer. Benefit of 30% may be substantial overestimate.Challenges in ductal carcinoma in situ risk communication and decision-making: report from an American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute workshopModelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test.Exploration of analysis methods for diagnostic imaging tests: problems with ROC AUC and confidence scores in CT colonography.Screening mammography in women aged 40-49: is it time to change?Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference?Screening in the dark: ethical considerations of providing screening tests to individuals when evidence is insufficient to support screening populationsPatients' & healthcare professionals' values regarding true- & false-positive diagnosis when colorectal cancer screening by CT colonography: discrete choice experiment.Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performancePresentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study.Perspectives on mammography after receipt of secondary screening owing to a false positiveDisadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach.Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma.Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspectiveAssessment of the Incremental Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) for Interpretation of CT Colonography by Experienced and Inexperienced Readers.Benefits and harms of mammography screening after age 74 years: model estimates of overdiagnosis.Women's responses to information about overdiagnosis in the UK breast cancer screening programme: a qualitative study.Statistical illiteracy in residents: what they do not learn today will hurt their patients tomorrowWhat is the point: will screening mammography save my life?Using an informed consent in mammography screening: a randomized trialBenefits of screening mammography."Well, have I got cancer or haven't I?" The psycho-social issues for women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.Women's Awareness of and Responses to Messages About Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment: Results From a 2016 National Survey.Mammography decision making: Trends and predictors of provider communication in the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2011 to 2014.Strengths and Gaps in Physicians' Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication.Breast cancer screening: a 35-year perspective.Women's Awareness and Perceived Importance of the Harms and Benefits of Mammography Screening: Results From a 2016 National Survey.Can you un-ring the bell? A qualitative study of how affect influences cancer screening decisions.Predictive genetics and predictive morphology have certain similarities.
P2860
Q24202273-05D6A8C2-F1C9-4C67-A1AA-4B420D6EC7DDQ24563753-E5F5D5E1-45DB-4203-B093-A23997084432Q27347760-A34CC328-4836-4AC5-AC9E-A4EC63B10E16Q30476933-D0C7135D-2985-42D6-B8BF-7F4FD8BC95CBQ30532790-0A3370CD-09DF-42D6-A3CA-B661A119565EQ30576161-779AFC12-4EF2-4711-B5FC-7C1158054F97Q30578410-E24E6E6B-1FBA-40B8-B72B-D42DF9B2F642Q33370698-690610C3-E3C8-47A2-AA41-EEF31688AF5CQ33679857-345EB28C-605D-435C-A3D9-DFD26260450FQ33728442-F29BC88C-6BDD-432A-8069-69C870E32C5CQ33803163-5F9EA6A0-F815-41F3-AD71-880A1D657A4CQ33803367-069ED701-7C21-44BC-8CB5-9BF8D302FF66Q33955787-8584DA5E-171A-476C-9BBB-53B70884A6F2Q34044186-1450FAAE-ECFC-494E-982C-4E1FF289DA2DQ34420751-4F74CCDC-562C-4B96-962C-F99C9FD1D487Q34521905-541A18F8-E46C-49F3-AE6A-EDBED3452BCDQ34902523-15256BC1-3680-41EB-A130-BA01583BD9DBQ35046772-E792DE2C-870B-4EC2-813C-7E25B771432AQ35069426-E5EB7876-DE93-4505-9DB3-EF2457F35965Q35100880-6B350D35-0DB3-43E0-AE88-E50959E88976Q35132326-778B6834-6C82-42AE-98F4-8CFBCE1E3EF4Q35164227-92E8B8A3-D81F-45BE-BD21-BCE2C23D6B56Q35169289-116968F7-A17E-4D46-8A5C-CB549B2770D8Q35571998-91CD2D47-F2E6-4BA3-84BE-268E40162F65Q35714557-75C76F88-C063-4927-995F-E371B21F9322Q35768973-6171BEA5-BBEF-4791-BA6F-0C5A0326C8CBQ36770273-AED03A5E-1ECC-4927-A110-A10847C2EA96Q36809821-56FC9DC6-6ABD-47C7-9A9C-DBB593C9CD42Q36957599-BCCBAB7E-A5F3-43C4-8E80-8F764566A945Q37161262-B27D06C0-45BB-47D3-8226-A5EAF8556872Q37441734-5374CAC1-AE8D-4174-8008-0F53CE5F3FDEQ37479118-D7EFFC06-FC2C-407C-824B-B255818FB1F7Q37481901-BCCDBACA-7A8C-4261-8E8C-34ED7DBE29C8Q38600299-28A223ED-BE58-46C6-8E52-EF7AC298ED3FQ39302508-81107F6B-5FB2-4816-8CF7-E20037142CDDQ39312413-093CF047-9C6A-4E1E-B17C-29919CA09413Q39736619-A31C1835-8C6A-4488-A409-41A57D50B47CQ40143717-C5C1B5D7-4BBC-49C1-B13A-07EAFAF43303Q41109068-B8E5D959-E76E-4620-BA71-E47AEB799381Q42096611-3DB87C56-F937-4EF7-BA2C-F60272A1C727
P2860
US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on June 2000
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
US women's attitudes to false ...... situ: cross sectional survey.
@en
US women's attitudes to false ...... situ: cross sectional survey.
@nl
type
label
US women's attitudes to false ...... situ: cross sectional survey.
@en
US women's attitudes to false ...... situ: cross sectional survey.
@nl
prefLabel
US women's attitudes to false ...... situ: cross sectional survey.
@en
US women's attitudes to false ...... situ: cross sectional survey.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
US women's attitudes to false ...... situ: cross sectional survey.
@en
P2093
B Fischhoff
L M Schwartz
S Woloshin
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.320.7250.1635
P407
P577
2000-06-01T00:00:00Z