Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.

Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37350528
Allogeneic morphogenetic protein vs. recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a radiographic and economic analysisBiomechanical comparison of multilevel lateral interbody fusion with and without supplementary instrumentation: a three-dimensional finite element study.Minimally invasive procedure reduces adjacent segment degeneration and disease: New benefit-based global meta-analysisMicroendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: short-term and medium-term outcomes.Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.The Effect of Obesity on the Improvement in Health State Outcomes following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: a meta-analysis.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature.Minimally Invasive versus Open Spine Surgery: What Does the Best Evidence Tell Us?Postoperative dysesthesia in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of five cases.Effectiveness and safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with previous laminectomy.Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy/Discectomy, Transforaminal Lumbar, and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Systematic Review.Three-year postoperative outcomes between MIS and conventional TLIF in1-segment lumbar disc herniation.Addition of TLIF does not improve outcome over standard posterior instrumented fusion. 5-10 years long-term Follow-up: results from a RCT.Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study.Clinical and Radiological Comparison between Three Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Fusion Techniques for Single-Level Lumbar Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimally Invasive Surgical Posterolateral Fusion versus Minimally Invasive
P2860

Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37350528
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 14 June 2013
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Clinical outcomes of minimally ...... at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.
@en
Clinical outcomes of minimally ...... at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.
@nl
type
label
Clinical outcomes of minimally ...... at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.
@en
Clinical outcomes of minimally ...... at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.
@nl
prefLabel
Clinical outcomes of minimally ...... at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.
@en
Clinical outcomes of minimally ...... at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.
@nl
P1433
P1476
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698
P932
P356
P1433
P1476
Clinical outcomes of minimally ...... at the 3- to 4-year follow-up
@en
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698
P932