Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review.
about
Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisationsUsing the Consumer Experience with Pharmacy Services Survey as a quality metric for ambulatory care pharmacies: older adults' perspectivesIs There a Relationship Between Patient Satisfaction and Favorable Surgical Outcomes?A field experiment on the impact of physician-level performance data on consumers' choice of physician.Reporting CAHPS and HEDIS data by race/ethnicity for Medicare beneficiaries.Patients' perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study.Effect of publicly reporting performance data of medicine use on injection use: a quasi-experimental study.An international cross-sectional survey on the Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICO-PC): recruitment and data collection of places delivering primary care across Canada.Patient Navigators and Parent Use of Quality Data: A Randomized TrialAn evidence-based framework to measure quality of allied health careDelivering High-Quality Cancer Care: The Critical Role of Quality Measurement.Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians' and Health Care Consumers' Perspectives.Rasch analysis of the Psychiatric Out-Patient Experiences Questionnaire (POPEQ).Physician groups' use of data from patient experience surveys.Perceived barriers to effective implementation of public reporting of hospital performance data in Australia: a qualitative studyHow do pregnant women use quality measures when choosing their obstetric provider?How Patient Comments Affect Consumers' Use of Physician Performance MeasuresTotal hip arthroplasty: what information do we offer patients on websites of hospitals?Prediction of hospital acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30-day mortality rates using publicly reported performance measuresIs the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?Different patient subgroup, different ranking? Which quality indicators do patients find important when choosing a hospital for hip- or knee arthroplasty?Reduction in Clostridium difficile infection rates after mandatory hospital public reporting: findings from a longitudinal cohort study in Canada.Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review.Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills.Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review.Classification of patients based on their evaluation of hospital outcomes: cluster analysis following a national survey in Norway.Reliability of risk-adjusted outcomes for profiling hospital surgical quality.Patients' expectations of variation in quality of care relates to their search for comparative performance information.Exploring consumer understanding and preferences for pharmacy quality information.Effect of public reporting on intensive care unit discharge destination and outcomes.Information presentation features and comprehensibility of hospital report cards: design analysis and online survey among users.Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey resultsDoes mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.Comparative Quality Indicators for Hospital Choice: Do General Practitioners Care?The impact of Public Reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective.What Influences Patients' Decisions When Choosing a Health Care Provider? Measuring Preferences of Patients with Knee Arthrosis, Chronic Depression, or Alzheimer's Disease, Using Discrete Choice Experiments.Governing healthcare through performance measurement in Massachusetts and the NetherlandsCesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issuesFactors that influence provider selection for elective total joint arthroplasty
P2860
Q24235185-AAB7C7E8-16F6-413A-ADA5-90433524E9C8Q24658654-DED95F82-31BB-47E4-BA34-54A799B7014CQ26795617-8808939A-BDBF-4761-9449-09094377F211Q30573309-87A17375-6E30-418E-840C-0B9BDE3114DCQ30597560-9AF9DA5F-988E-46FB-8F07-45B11FA69F86Q30618019-887BDEEB-F8B1-4958-9AFE-027C9E3BCAFDQ30860193-47081E31-EB61-4040-ACD2-28F4FAAE76DBQ30933929-22719FD1-E9B1-47A6-85D9-A61347E7195BQ31127015-9A31F519-C7E3-4123-8756-6FC532C72553Q33588133-499B8280-26D0-4AED-BFFB-DFD99FFAB239Q33613935-0E6AAE4B-D2DE-42B2-AB33-62D1CCD9DB21Q33690196-116ED226-2334-4905-B440-474691A8FDD3Q33709663-83A807B9-79F8-4140-961B-53FA8B399E61Q33772633-4A050F76-4E17-4341-988B-33864DBEB46BQ33776301-474204E5-2673-4EFE-B5BD-BB9566100345Q33834092-57A63623-E96D-4C6B-A9A6-03C69BDE3D44Q33867580-6897E841-D09C-4864-AC78-43808F89E3B2Q33876906-20463A3B-0034-4EDF-BF42-789228728E59Q33897691-7B908332-CC57-4194-8819-EC02815D7479Q34015250-2BA6F368-F20A-4A13-BFE0-4D611928FC23Q34066120-FE083201-AB45-483F-A704-54BF3EFBF80BQ34289281-8F847A9F-96B1-41D6-ABAC-F9D30BF414F8Q34389956-15359A89-A503-48B9-8F21-AA539DD9424BQ34408617-D947245E-08A1-4817-9985-06A270B91F1EQ34570727-B7DE0D62-96F4-42CB-9601-7F7F9DB598BEQ34596807-53EB559F-5AED-4CC7-B462-A4CF0BF46848Q34602307-2605F26F-BE47-4EDE-8EC0-21E184E95A82Q34695348-A582BC99-3345-45F6-89C6-2EF172A3FE5DQ34808396-90DC4AE9-C52B-41A8-94CB-A848781B19EEQ35127753-F7B7F488-0300-4BBF-B1EF-A1D3B678A79FQ35239784-1BE659E8-FCC7-418A-AFC8-7FA817649B17Q35745753-FABC192F-8935-4360-9A61-969ABACF4270Q35855259-6DEFE950-2688-48EE-AA53-23698CD85237Q35913250-97E29D4F-6CB1-4196-AC65-D50E5ED428C3Q36083600-E2851C87-B2CA-4CF5-B4F4-65906011EF52Q36370248-C58BCD9B-A376-42A7-83FA-2BBFD3B3E1BDQ36410714-F1CA4337-94C0-4135-BF17-F998AD3B55B7Q36554889-4216E555-AAB9-4D65-9A57-9B429240E549Q36737244-3532609E-DDA3-4319-AD1C-B47B9421D3E4Q36997565-21F2441A-1E45-4EAA-8FCB-3EAD2FC2A62F
P2860
Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on January 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Public reporting in health car ...... ormation? A systematic review.
@en
Public reporting in health car ...... ormation? A systematic review.
@nl
type
label
Public reporting in health car ...... ormation? A systematic review.
@en
Public reporting in health car ...... ormation? A systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
Public reporting in health car ...... ormation? A systematic review.
@en
Public reporting in health car ...... ormation? A systematic review.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Public reporting in health car ...... ormation? A systematic review.
@en
P2093
Hub Wollersheim
Marije Bosch
Marjan Faber
Richard Grol
Sheila Leatherman
P356
10.1097/MLR.0B013E3181808BB5
P577
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z