Guidelines for seagrass restoration: importance of habitat selection and donor population, spreading of risks, and ecosystem engineering effects.
about
Genetic diversity enhances restoration success by augmenting ecosystem servicesConservation of eelgrass (Zostera marina) genetic diversity in a mesocosm-based restoration experimentResilience of alternative states in spatially extended ecosystems.Edge Effects along a Seagrass Margin Result in an Increased Grazing Risk on Posidonia australis Transplants.Burial Duration and Frequency Influences Resilience of Differing Propagule Types in a Subtidal Seagrass, Posidonia australis.Limited effects of source population identity and number on seagrass transplant performance.Accounting for Uncertainty and Time Lags in Equivalency Calculations for Offsetting in Aquatic Resources Management Programs.Copper treatment during storage reduces Phytophthora and Halophytophthora infection of Zostera marina seeds used for restoration.The fundamental role of ecological feedback mechanisms for the adaptive management of seagrass ecosystems - a review.Identifying habitats at risk: simple models can reveal complex ecosystem dynamics.Temporal stability in patterns of genetic diversity and structure of a marine foundation species (Zostera marina).Long-term acclimation to reciprocal light conditions suggests depth-related selection in the marine foundation species Posidonia oceanicaIdentifying critical recruitment bottlenecks limiting seedling establishment in a degraded seagrass ecosystem.Species richness accelerates marine ecosystem restoration in the Coral Triangle.Seagrasses are negatively affected by organic matter loading and Arenicola marina activity in a laboratory experiment.Suppressing antagonistic bioengineering feedbacks doubles restoration success.The use of δ¹⁵N signatures of translocated macroalgae to map coastal nutrient plumes: improving species selection and spatial analysis of metropolitan datasets.Restoring species through reintroductions: strategies for source population selectionGlobal analysis of seagrass restoration: the importance of large-scale plantingSeagrass rehabilitation off metropolitan Adelaide: a case study of loss, action, failure and successLarge-Scale Prediction of Seagrass Distribution Integrating Landscape Metrics and Environmental Factors: The Case of Cymodocea nodosa (Mediterranean–Atlantic)Confronting Feedbacks of Degraded Marine EcosystemsParadigms in the Recovery of Estuarine and Coastal EcosystemsAssessing the CO2capture potential of seagrass restoration projectsFeedback between sediment and light for seagrass: Where is it important?Prioritizing localized management actions for seagrass conservation and restoration using a species distribution modelGenetic diversity in threatened Posidonia australis seagrass meadowsThe effects of air exposure on the desiccation rate and photosynthetic activity of Thalassia hemprichii and Enhalus acoroidesRecovery of Donor Meadows ofPosidonia sinuosaandPosidonia australisContributes to Sustainable Seagrass TransplantationChanges in benthic community structure and sediment characteristics after natural recolonisation of the seagrass Zostera muelleriShort-term mudflat dynamics drive long-term cyclic salt marsh dynamics
P2860
Q30426111-9E91D938-DFF8-43AC-80A4-8C67C49A684DQ35107048-67BBF954-E034-4EA3-A331-CAD523360A70Q35122511-645390B1-FA81-4658-87F0-B54441E96812Q35806517-DEE592F1-50FE-42F3-BABD-8EA31EDD9DA8Q36104183-B2D8E413-492B-4FAD-8FAF-4C421BE79346Q36298950-16996B44-3579-4279-A8F4-8743F116278AQ36376177-4327EF1A-84B8-4D32-A32D-4C8F83A876C5Q37657992-E64D3C45-4382-4B0B-BC0C-741E3D12D9E5Q38942694-B0183165-7AA6-4A6C-B4C1-A8F55BF09F77Q38975211-500E1639-7110-4436-B2C5-8D12A96A0C27Q39060474-AD59242C-EF1D-46BC-9527-77ACA9DD5543Q41895835-68DC6911-1478-4697-A8C5-A364048BD970Q45071609-756BE400-47A4-49BE-BADA-47D6F7021ECCQ46273172-F92FCA06-D70B-42DE-9571-A0E795EC3934Q46918519-E07708D0-155A-4EF8-9630-39A24608A9A0Q51555604-EC62FA75-E894-4037-BCFA-FAC94DC0114FQ53108172-4DB3F9E5-237F-4FE6-A5BC-B14AD15779FCQ56287284-92153B97-A45C-41A2-9656-2F5BF21AF56FQ56852257-0CBEB6F6-D3C7-4530-A0A7-099A78B9AA17Q56961238-902805D2-2893-4201-9877-B9B00C68437DQ56978843-0C0BA5F6-B2AD-4953-A36E-8B821F99BEE8Q57030937-24B3F7D2-6BD6-4323-8210-3868E48BC933Q57208804-0975510C-C5C1-4AE6-8BD6-D13709A48409Q57208837-B5550C89-3ADB-42D9-B2FA-DACA3B3C9737Q57608417-7D7E0EBE-5921-4F01-AB56-EEEABE03314EQ57608428-6A21BACB-4145-4EC1-8494-EC0FDCBB6467Q57708995-9B7B791A-BE72-4FF3-824A-3742AE86E635Q57727916-4ABA9A5F-4E6B-4702-95B6-27306DA836C3Q58703410-31B77E02-4C49-4993-9208-33F3F2B881EEQ58763360-8C68EB2A-F6F9-4A11-A836-84E56709131EQ58800337-62A8409D-9793-49BB-B1F5-7D245B0A4CD0
P2860
Guidelines for seagrass restoration: importance of habitat selection and donor population, spreading of risks, and ecosystem engineering effects.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 07 January 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Guidelines for seagrass restor ...... ecosystem engineering effects.
@en
Guidelines for seagrass restor ...... ecosystem engineering effects.
@nl
type
label
Guidelines for seagrass restor ...... ecosystem engineering effects.
@en
Guidelines for seagrass restor ...... ecosystem engineering effects.
@nl
prefLabel
Guidelines for seagrass restor ...... ecosystem engineering effects.
@en
Guidelines for seagrass restor ...... ecosystem engineering effects.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Guidelines for seagrass restor ...... ecosystem engineering effects.
@en
P2093
D C R Hermus
D J de Jong
L S A M Hanssen
M M van Katwijk
V N de Jonge
P304
P356
10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2008.09.028
P577
2009-01-07T00:00:00Z