A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered.
about
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysisErythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysisImmunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysisPsychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adultsPsychosocial interventions for adults who were sexually abused as childrenFirst-line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancerErythropoiesis stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysisImmunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysisImmunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysisFirst-line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancerComparative efficacy and acceptability of first-generation and second-generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depression: protocol for a network meta-analysisComparison of physical interventions, behavioral interventions, natural health products, and pharmacologics to manage hot flashes in patients with breast or prostate cancer: protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses.Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta-analysisA Bayesian network meta-analysis: Comparing the clinical effectiveness of local corticosteroid injections using different treatment strategies for carpal tunnel syndromeImpact of reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant placebo-controlled trialsEfficacy and Safety of HER2-Targeted Agents for Breast Cancer with HER2-Overexpression: A Network Meta-AnalysisGetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: Individual patient data may be beneficial if only for a subset of trials.Network meta-analysis of individual and aggregate level data.A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses.An overview of methods for network meta-analysis using individual participant data: when do benefits arise?Efficacy and toxicity of external-beam radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer: a network meta-analysisEvaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventionsIndirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological qualityAn investigation of the impact of using different methods for network meta-analysis: a protocol for an empirical evaluationA systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison of dapagliflozin with existing anti-diabetes treatments for those with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by sulfonylurea monotherapyManagement of frailty: a protocol of a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.What zinc supplementation does and does not achieve in diarrhea prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is neededThe relative efficacy of nine osteoporosis medications for reducing the rate of fractures in post-menopausal womenNetwork meta-analysis of multiple outcome measures accounting for borrowing of information across outcomesInvestigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature.Efficacy and acceptability of acute treatments for persistent depressive disorder: a network meta-analysis.Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons.Meta-regression models to address heterogeneity and inconsistency in network meta-analysis of survival outcomes.Meta-epidemiology.Safety and effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus intermediate-acting insulin or placebo for patients with type 2 diabetes failing two oral antihyperglycaemic agents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers.Gastrointestinal adverse events of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.
P2860
Q24185907-E3819067-D975-4335-8CF1-EA06BED12274Q24187413-B52A570D-AF81-4B18-8C3A-744C27F92E29Q24188270-B98D3E44-4152-426A-B86D-C4A6B883ECABQ24200675-335402A7-26ED-43E9-A9BE-2A42CCCA531FQ24201096-A2FAD840-9748-49A2-852E-33810CBCB903Q24201207-CDE401DF-83AB-4D64-B9DE-5A42A8B54306Q24201673-8C31681F-7CAD-4492-96DB-C2CEBAC686BBQ24202108-77F2474A-F8BA-4D49-9B9D-D2F77E6DFBDDQ24235249-9BECC8E9-841E-4946-9C1B-AFF243407C21Q26471909-CAF885EF-8B94-4FEE-8DAB-FE7512BEF2F6Q26779632-CE8E8EDF-5DC2-403A-A9EA-0F5D93A6A276Q26797380-FEC5926B-40A5-4841-9D2A-EEDFDFC9753FQ28291768-57AF2DDA-9DAE-41F3-A471-24C76D273C8DQ28394352-D075BC61-B1DC-44A0-9358-5F171258010DQ28482475-4A5E6975-2200-4727-A93D-98BC4C0B763DQ28547354-3EB8976C-C2F9-482C-8852-5BD031457A32Q30251972-C4F79754-17B4-4856-83C5-A9EF7BD95D68Q30567158-A6A1B0B3-950A-4AEA-B543-9DD04A7BF5E0Q30969336-772C79C8-94ED-4BCB-95C6-E29B6FBF82D4Q31112914-503D4B4A-FEA6-433D-A494-AFCFA9FA31B1Q31119372-B8C791C7-378C-4EC1-A0EF-9A708AF18EF1Q33613683-A8B39748-E7DD-4ADC-9520-6430BD9A4119Q33620679-24466995-1FC7-4D0A-9F44-C971DD76BBC9Q33750311-B2BE430C-A6C7-4E77-A908-332E706CB606Q33831023-7DA3BCC8-5FBD-4DC4-BC95-ECF73BEF5CDDQ33859245-14CEBBC9-1922-4A2E-9E0C-1D2C3ED622ABQ33876956-A3D8B742-C058-456C-B309-1072CD27D4B3Q33898872-921E9586-E70A-4310-BF09-BE6517A3D653Q33943750-2C4ADCD5-1EC0-4BD8-BB31-237ECD4839B5Q34029509-4ABEF973-F475-4792-A75C-2C009D526164Q34079499-966DCF0F-36F1-4B9A-80E1-1A3F379D2DF8Q34356617-B89F2B78-151A-4AB8-91C3-0E120C052497Q34399289-D16F3A4B-A813-428D-87D2-4266051D969AQ34413025-0E073F8F-331D-4785-9709-AB8679A9DE62Q34436139-C47EC6A9-1BB4-48E2-AAAC-3572D8DAE3B2Q34454354-29BBE8CB-0820-4624-B3E0-126DC1124B70Q34767965-F6F18BA5-3998-42D1-8217-295DF90C41CBQ34798269-452BCE66-5402-4835-AD0D-E2630858A6FDQ34915090-B1BC3E51-4E32-4B1B-96C0-5D2B47BA3EC1Q35009612-B2EC7A6B-21E9-4877-A6FB-D5CDD3601C1A
P2860
A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 20 January 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
A case study of multiple-treat ...... variates should be considered.
@en
A case study of multiple-treat ...... variates should be considered.
@nl
type
label
A case study of multiple-treat ...... variates should be considered.
@en
A case study of multiple-treat ...... variates should be considered.
@nl
prefLabel
A case study of multiple-treat ...... variates should be considered.
@en
A case study of multiple-treat ...... variates should be considered.
@nl
P1476
A case study of multiple-treat ...... variates should be considered.
@en
P2093
Georgia Salanti
Valeria Marinho
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2008.10.001
P577
2009-01-20T00:00:00Z