Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches.
about
Revisiting United States valuation of EQ-5D states.Non-monotonicity in the episodic random utility model.Non-fatal disease burden for subtypes of depressive disorder: population-based epidemiological studyToward a more universal approach in health valuation.Modeling ranking, time trade-off, and visual analog scale values for EQ-5D health states: a review and comparison of methods.Using surveys to calculate disability-adjusted life-year.Health outcomes in economic evaluation: who should value health?Ordering errors, objections and invariance in utility survey responses: a framework for understanding who, why and what to do.Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods.Transforming Latent Utilities to Health Utilities: East Does Not Meet West.Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D.Logical Inconsistencies in 3 Preference Elicitation Methods for EQ-5D Health States: A Study in the Brazilian Population.Nothing About Us Without Us? A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Health-State Values for the Child Health Utility-9D Using Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling.An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states.Non-fatal burden of disease due to mental disorders in the Netherlands.Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments--a QALY space model approach.Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population.
P2860
Q35282005-09370064-1E02-4162-998A-EA4A5ABFEF49Q35788391-2C9419C4-7FAF-4658-A5B8-35CD3DF19B56Q36017118-CC881075-CD03-4DA6-AD80-5CD381488ED3Q37286077-5219ECF6-C87E-4711-A224-AC5FCB83E3AEQ37315922-E02CB4A9-AD9B-4B25-8044-07D1CE80FEE3Q37537391-54799C31-0382-47B1-B47A-70231B6AE733Q37834127-31CDAD84-DC91-4F11-A81E-E31E0E1A6F5FQ37891049-B2E8BDA0-57EA-4EDA-901D-DC88D9B86E63Q38031819-FE3DBEEE-E0B2-488A-A5AE-20B1AC57CF4BQ39284068-3A5A394F-CC55-4824-A521-17CDA93EF79FQ39587358-9A80971B-A190-456A-9B2C-15606C25DC05Q40306709-062A39C0-3CB8-4710-B5AB-DAF32CFD2ABBQ41416295-11080151-0317-41A4-9294-198F5679860EQ43891957-0F042E1A-CAC4-4573-A8E1-7AA653DBC73CQ44150418-5B628517-49F9-471F-B724-B122361CAD0BQ48072882-B1F7EA98-7A5C-4614-AF60-2916EF7F2521Q48171221-D1693B1C-3FC0-4D6E-AECD-1D23F644AAABQ48191984-023D13CE-D9A4-4842-8B0C-D15805C8381F
P2860
Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 21 October 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Keep it simple: ranking health ...... rdinal measurement approaches.
@en
Keep it simple: ranking health ...... rdinal measurement approaches.
@nl
type
label
Keep it simple: ranking health ...... rdinal measurement approaches.
@en
Keep it simple: ranking health ...... rdinal measurement approaches.
@nl
prefLabel
Keep it simple: ranking health ...... rdinal measurement approaches.
@en
Keep it simple: ranking health ...... rdinal measurement approaches.
@nl
P2860
P1476
Keep it simple: ranking health ...... rdinal measurement approaches.
@en
P2093
Benjamin M Craig
Jan J V Busschbach
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2008.07.002
P577
2008-10-21T00:00:00Z