Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
about
The magical activation of left amygdala when reading Harry Potter: an fMRI study on how descriptions of supra-natural events entertain and enchantCognitive empathy modulates the processing of pragmatic constraints during sentence comprehensionNeurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: pitfalls, parameters and prospects.Recognizing the authenticity of emotional expressions: F0 contour matters when you need to knowExtracting salient sublexical units from written texts: "Emophon," a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity.The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception.10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?The neural substrates of natural reading: a comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI.Simulating fiction: individual differences in literature comprehension revealed with FMRI.The Berlin Affective Word List for Children (kidBAWL): Exploring Processing of Affective Lexical Semantics in the Visual and Auditory ModalitiesWords in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading.Integration Processes Compared: Cortical Differences for Consistency Evaluation and Passive Comprehension in Local and Global Coherence.On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question.When Fiction Is Just as Real as Fact: No Differences in Reading Behavior between Stories Believed to be Based on True or Fictional Events.The default modes of reading: modulation of posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex connectivity associated with comprehension and task focus while reading.Prediction During Natural Language Comprehension.
P2860
Q28650048-5F3B4ECB-B6B3-4C70-AF9B-8EF093C42411Q28654705-B8E28AD1-5767-44AD-9050-45F1A689F35DQ30374304-5D07728F-67E5-488D-997D-FF89C959EA3EQ30378048-B774D352-BC10-413F-8878-BF52EC36FB06Q30440558-495D5947-A065-4A10-8DB3-3C0D4DF18999Q30448453-B8EAD050-B84D-4FE6-8A31-D30C314CFBE0Q30572306-731F6EEC-317F-4E49-AF9A-019BA65B002DQ30652767-5B7FC666-5024-4912-AFCD-27D7F722DC99Q34762782-660BBF87-30EF-4ABE-91C6-4E1AFED480BEQ35073977-4BFD61EA-E12C-460B-AE5D-7E4A04D2BF09Q37054904-6C74B7A0-494C-45D6-B19E-9A1C23164096Q38390692-8DFBACEA-8D37-4348-8CAB-F01548EDD314Q38391928-09AA8D75-308B-41E8-91D1-4DBC37251363Q39033740-93580BDC-0F67-4B86-9FE0-604F2E332ED9Q41808892-CF7C5070-9F6A-4B23-B80B-A662F2B757DAQ41863133-0EF34442-F131-4CA0-ACA4-CB44544DFA10Q48215803-BE180D53-AF42-46A3-B0A5-68155321CEEE
P2860
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 05 September 2012
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@en
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@nl
type
label
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@en
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@nl
prefLabel
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@en
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@en
P2093
Arthur M Jacobs
Isabel C Bohrn
Oliver Lubrich
Ulrike Altmann
P2860
P356
10.1093/SCAN/NSS098
P577
2012-09-05T00:00:00Z