Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.

Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37411509
The magical activation of left amygdala when reading Harry Potter: an fMRI study on how descriptions of supra-natural events entertain and enchantCognitive empathy modulates the processing of pragmatic constraints during sentence comprehensionNeurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: pitfalls, parameters and prospects.Recognizing the authenticity of emotional expressions: F0 contour matters when you need to knowExtracting salient sublexical units from written texts: "Emophon," a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity.The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception.10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?The neural substrates of natural reading: a comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI.Simulating fiction: individual differences in literature comprehension revealed with FMRI.The Berlin Affective Word List for Children (kidBAWL): Exploring Processing of Affective Lexical Semantics in the Visual and Auditory ModalitiesWords in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading.Integration Processes Compared: Cortical Differences for Consistency Evaluation and Passive Comprehension in Local and Global Coherence.On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question.When Fiction Is Just as Real as Fact: No Differences in Reading Behavior between Stories Believed to be Based on True or Fictional Events.The default modes of reading: modulation of posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex connectivity associated with comprehension and task focus while reading.Prediction During Natural Language Comprehension.
P2860

Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37411509
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 05 September 2012
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@en
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@nl
type
label
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@en
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@nl
prefLabel
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@en
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@nl
P1433
P1476
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698
P932
P356
P1433
P1476
Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698
P932