Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer.
about
Colorectal cancer diagnosis: Pitfalls and opportunitiesClinical validation of the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) II criteria in an open-access unit: a prospective study.European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy II guidelines help in selecting and prioritizing patients referred to colonoscopy--a quality control study.A survey of colonoscopic surveillance after polypectomy.Predictors of colorectal polyp recurrence after the first polypectomy in private practice settings: a cohort study.Inter-physician variation in follow-up colonoscopies after screening colonoscopy.An ongoing case-control study to evaluate the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Patients at Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.Endoscopic surveillance after curative surgery for sporadic colorectal cancer: patient-tailored, tumor-targeted or biology-driven?Factors affecting insertion time for colonoscopy performed under intramuscular analgesia in patients with history of colorectal resection.Interlaboratory variability in the grading of dysplasia in a nationwide cohort of colorectal adenomas.Synchronous polyps predict metachronous colorectal lesions after curative resection of colorectal cancer.Metabolic factors affect the occurrence of colorectal neoplasm on surveillance colonoscopies.A cross-sectional study of the appropriateness of colonoscopy requests in the Spanish region of Catalonia.Polyp surveillance after surgery for colorectal cancer.Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey.
P2860
Q26774105-F84F07B2-2B1E-4154-8C48-84F13EA88F89Q30485215-54EEA9DE-83A5-4339-9ED4-5B0A809180C8Q30486800-6823A7E1-C77D-4A95-9D31-A4B519AE17D7Q33618920-6B3B6489-0C6C-4696-BCBC-1EB0364E540AQ34506690-514931AB-C45B-4E7B-B958-7BB25AD3AA78Q34853844-91C2ECB7-AE1C-40AF-8CC6-810922B28D51Q35060519-43EC7F28-4350-480F-B9DA-BAAAFCF4DE38Q36409308-85ACDFE7-C69E-4C03-AA9A-4FA8BB640324Q37765573-9EDBF32D-38CC-40EA-B762-0E9C73F764D9Q38477409-CF03FA9B-49C6-47CF-9B3D-B3B08F2CFF25Q38927673-86BE0615-C404-4848-A4B9-BA95A094718EQ40647099-036D0E1F-0919-4022-832F-E7E09FDED670Q41001554-51356EAC-F764-4CBC-82DD-9C6072DD58FDQ42043647-169800FB-54A2-4315-B84B-44100F49443BQ46400468-7721D88C-5457-45F7-B91D-711B9E816F2EQ50078618-8A9ADA3D-FC60-43D4-B338-C480542B9380
P2860
Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 11 March 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Appropriateness of colonoscopy ...... esection of colorectal cancer.
@en
type
label
Appropriateness of colonoscopy ...... esection of colorectal cancer.
@en
prefLabel
Appropriateness of colonoscopy ...... esection of colorectal cancer.
@en
P2093
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
Appropriateness of colonoscopy ...... resection of colorectal cancer
@en
P2093
EPAGE II Study Group
F Froehlich
J-J Gonvers
P Juillerat
R W Dubois
P304
P356
10.1055/S-0028-1119646
P577
2009-03-11T00:00:00Z