about
Cutaneous Scar Prevention and Management: Overview of current therapiesPatient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Systematic Review of their Development, Content, and Psychometric Validation.A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring.Exploring reliability of scar rating scales using photographs of burns from children aged up to 15 years.Successful treatment of depressed, distensible acne scars using autologous fibroblasts: a multi-site, prospective, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trialPopulation perception of surgical approach in minimally invasive surgery.Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars.Two-Step Incision for Periarterial Sympathectomy of the Hand.Patient-reported satisfaction and cosmesis outcomes following laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy.A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices.Clinimetrics of tristimulus colourimeters in scar assessment: a review of evidence.Nonsurgical scar management of the face: does early versus late intervention affect outcome?Practice guidelines for the application of nonsilicone or silicone gels and gel sheets after burn injury.Short and long-term cosmesis of cervical thyroidectomy scars.Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.Reliability of photographic analysis of wound epithelialization assessed in human skin graft donor sites and epidermolysis bullosa woundsCharacterizing tissue stiffness at the tip of a rigid needle using an opto-mechanical force sensor.Reconstruction after skin cancer excision through a dermal induction template: our experience.Comparison of scalp and abdomen as split-thickness skin graft donor sites for aural stenosis repair.Long term post PrePex male circumcision outcomes in an urban population in Uganda: a cohort study.Suprafascial versus traditional harvesting technique for free antero lateral thigh flap: A case-control study to assess the best functional and aesthetic result in extremity reconstruction.Association of TGFβ1 and clinical factors with scar outcome following melanoma excision.Evaluation of donor site morbidity after medial triceps brachii free flap for lower limb reconstruction.The SCAR (Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating) scale: development and validation of a new outcome measure for postoperative scar assessment.Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Disposable Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Standard Care in Bilateral Breast Reduction Mammoplasty Evaluating Surgical Site Complications and Scar Quality.Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique foHybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, clinical results and patient-reported outcomes of 50 consecutive cases.Construction of Skin Graft Seams in Burn Patients: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Study.Comparison of W-Plasty and Straight-Line Trichophytic Closure on Aesthetic Outcomes of Occipital Hairline Scars in Rhytidectomy.Reliability of Repeated Measurements on Post-Burn Scars with Corneometer CM 825(®).Aesthetic Comparison of Two Different Types of Web-Space Reconstruction for Finger Syndactyly
P2860
Q26766680-7B55AFDD-E209-463D-ACA7-EA48A903897EQ30249218-A3957AE0-8F27-4834-9182-A3FB646FE5C9Q34479310-7DD1969E-12EB-45B9-A2FD-D657EBB8D91DQ34524223-8EF9CE53-B00C-4AFA-A32C-D345CC438477Q34659320-E40A51C3-336F-4619-8701-59F41E324E59Q34995561-577CC535-64EE-4324-8A06-54D9C0607772Q35663737-12E5DFF7-5E53-4C4C-96BF-51EC9DA141C7Q36320228-B8C5E347-F97F-4D77-A838-CAB98C0924FEQ37496446-9A578183-D105-4A55-9A76-E44922A9B6F9Q37769413-4C266FB9-F1C7-4E81-9C33-59D1CF449030Q37975406-E5FB5642-608C-440F-A7CF-99BBA474A55AQ38118507-3E7E1421-B181-4A29-814E-AFCAD35662C3Q38237166-305D3EF6-31F2-46C4-B3E2-4BC518B25685Q38674848-AC92F1F3-7B56-40B3-92D8-E9EDC7350A35Q39765460-DDEB7CED-09B9-4B04-8251-E4FCB15E7D48Q40895906-C2CC78E4-1BE7-4D60-9D11-D99335A7071CQ42186226-778364A8-BB5A-4E1E-ACF2-3E35A2170E1BQ42456626-64DEA2F0-F720-4D75-9B3E-B6D454F7A897Q44113581-96C1A84A-1336-4320-A88D-95929B0204E0Q47116395-D93E0B2C-30B6-4957-A070-5FBB2653F756Q47616552-F010EAF4-5545-4817-A27B-2697728D9FB7Q47795780-FE8BD8F6-548E-4925-A84E-536E8604ED21Q48100061-EAB23D7B-2549-4CCE-AE51-D9915FEBD1BAQ48299739-140D0FC2-FC53-4AE6-8FCF-8E35A917F420Q50017105-D04ACAD6-4A9E-44A1-9D93-77CED13C2905Q50187614-0772628E-4CCD-4702-8B9C-339009628BCFQ50191654-8CF58688-B96A-4ABF-B852-82A67AC2EAECQ51819056-0406FBA7-1F8E-4C55-9C41-7BE23ED86663Q52936077-27AA1D77-95EB-41B7-AB66-370C336E49F8Q53158252-66CCBC3F-C226-47AC-858A-F9E505653665Q57145162-9864CBDD-BD27-4DF4-A4D8-36A5269206B2
P2860
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 20 March 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
@en
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
@nl
type
label
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
@en
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
@nl
prefLabel
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
@en
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
@nl
P1476
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review
@en
P2093
D A McGrouther
M W J Ferguson
P304
P356
10.1016/J.BJPS.2009.01.080
P577
2009-03-20T00:00:00Z