Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews

Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37433313

about

TNF-alpha inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis Preventive pharmacologic treatments for episodic migraine in adults Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison of intravitreal aflibercept with other therapies for diabetic macular edema (DME)An overview of conducting systematic reviews with network meta-analysis Treatment of depressive disorders in primary care--protocol of a multiple treatment systematic review of randomized controlled trials The importance of baseline viral load when assessing relative efficacy in treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review The effectiveness of pharmacological agents for the treatment of uveitic macular oedema (UMO): a systematic review protocol Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose and Other Formulations in Iron-Deficient Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Effect of duration and intermittency of rifampin on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Impact of reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant placebo-controlled trials Effect of combination therapy on joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Estimating the power of indirect comparisons: a simulation study GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.A systematic review with attempted network meta-analysis of asthma therapy recommended for five to eighteen year olds in GINA steps three and four The use of individual patient-level data (IPD) to quantify the impact of pretreatment predictors of response to treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients.Treatment strategies for women with WHO group II anovulation: systematic review and network meta-analysis A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data The quality of reporting methods and results in network meta-analyses: an overview of reviews and suggestions for improvement.Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions Comparative efficacy and acceptability of amitriptyline, duloxetine and milnacipran in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality Edoxaban in the evolving scenario of non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants imputed placebo analysis and multiple treatment comparisons.Using structural equation modeling for network meta-analysis.Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.The relative clinical effectiveness of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in diabetic macular oedema: an indirect comparison in a systematic review.Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons.Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group Impact of evergreening on patients and health insurance: a meta analysis and reimbursement cost analysis of citalopram/escitalopram antidepressants.Modelling heterogeneity variances in multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis--are informative priors the better solution?What guidance are researchers given on how to present network meta-analyses to end-users such as policymakers and clinicians? A systematic review.Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers.Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.Multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: a step forward into complexity.Effect of common comparators in indirect comparison analysis of the effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma.Characteristics of a loop of evidence that affect detection and estimation of inconsistency: a simulation study.An assessment of the methodological quality of published network meta-analyses: a systematic review.

P2860

Q24186462-1FB111ED-154D-439D-B06D-59F4BE635637 Q24186663-2EC42A5D-0486-4DA1-A7DB-677192B609EC Q24235637-2D17172D-94D9-4ABA-B5BB-4F26FD1D134F Q24630992-69011829-36F0-44B0-BCBF-6A72E51BC1D5 Q26823985-6FA702D0-F4BB-480C-9ADF-150C8DCFA663 Q26827222-2691DD78-B28D-4044-993C-CE5116D484C7 Q26996682-F4514F2F-862B-4C27-B881-2508DB0906C5 Q27016075-DFABC8A6-5492-4B1B-9FDF-12FE33CFDD06 Q27022649-D50FE118-5F11-400D-8920-F0DCE301A8E1 Q28068067-03130042-13C6-4F86-A059-B8FAC7FB0EC4 Q28085514-3AC70DE4-5F0A-40BC-8796-D254C03D6EC7 Q28476120-9866A5A4-AB61-4FFC-83DC-267FEB1AC8B9 Q28482475-8B5FDAF3-0FF5-496C-B6FB-796BFA8AA10E Q28543128-2D17659B-FA60-4404-B140-9C78AE5FA5DB Q28743349-3D57F343-AC77-4733-9908-5E44611CD9FC Q30251972-CC7C4CD4-2DC3-4916-A003-7696D605A9E0 Q30536662-8289495A-3FCC-491A-940C-0E3263CE6120 Q30586377-CADADDC6-A22A-4950-A88E-3F02988060DF Q30847984-61685582-8BA8-4767-AE4F-8B015D47A7A5 Q31085484-2DCF32DA-937A-456B-80D6-E4CA64E0B1C6 Q31154724-9F6BC9DD-6475-48C2-A73C-9D3AE9242365 Q33620679-8C12FD7C-2E13-4A87-B386-8EE8625C4EA1 Q33747253-B8BC290B-4425-4F0A-9463-F69D13AA8001 Q33750311-A3544A35-69D9-45E0-88C1-EECABF0DA7C0 Q33793622-48C8514D-4E4B-407A-85E9-9B10CC8798DE Q33909204-45B69819-D0C2-41E8-8DF1-3E4BC002979B Q33943750-F7EC4B18-31CF-4451-876A-2C4055BE2CEF Q34258967-76A9E9F8-0A36-4D94-B00A-E20D864F64E7 Q34378757-8E9745C0-E06E-42EB-B153-4EEA09AAA1AC Q34413025-D857ACED-7EA6-4E0F-BF28-F99D23A9D43A Q34447636-D5D361C9-D17B-4B96-9F87-98030E552964 Q34483629-DBE9E6FE-6721-4071-803E-09B0944B8C56 Q34545549-14F336F0-478B-4139-9D1D-DFFD7418C1D9 Q34724513-BBBE064A-BA1A-471B-AAFF-981C0D81A28B Q34798269-1A9D6CBA-4439-416A-ADDE-A479148F5316 Q35009612-C08AD773-2569-41DF-B116-ECCDF14E146F Q35089776-905CB30A-CE5D-49F9-98D5-081B63DFCA62 Q35203446-F3B6E845-D78B-4E16-9AFE-B4C63E35BC85 Q35266148-EB309763-7211-4E91-A2B8-97991E51EC76 Q35553233-5608F04A-C2CB-431D-8D76-E99FCCD8D156

P2860

Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37433313

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@pt

bilimsel makale

@tr

scientific article published on 03 April 2009

@en

vedecký článok

@sk

vetenskaplig artikel

@sv

videnskabelig artikel

@da

vědecký článek

@cs

name

Methodological problems in the ...... f published systematic reviews

@en

Methodological problems in the ...... published systematic reviews.

@nl

type

label

Methodological problems in the ...... f published systematic reviews

@en

Methodological problems in the ...... published systematic reviews.

@nl

prefLabel

Methodological problems in the ...... f published systematic reviews

@en

Methodological problems in the ...... published systematic reviews.

@nl

P1433

Q37433313-EBD75B48-4244-4948-ADD3-D5DC4045272E

P1476

Q37433313-8E3D4807-358E-4AAF-9E66-F33147FBD360

P2093

Q37433313-5B79B262-9299-4B18-B07B-7D0B6046220D

Q37433313-9C95B923-DB45-48CB-9CFA-860753798F70

Q37433313-A7EBA317-6844-498A-815A-41FC225BCCA3

Q37433313-F2B0C38A-938F-42C0-B8A4-732EE2B8D69D

P275

Q37433313-7FF49785-2FE1-4625-A9E6-941F4CC16E30

P2860

Q37433313-07768C4B-7830-4F0B-8B33-52385BF8DA18

Q37433313-2ECD4AB5-3911-481F-8FE5-AFC8A21D67EF

Q37433313-3688395C-D4BE-4251-A1D2-D2358CA84574

Q37433313-373E48AF-CCEE-4306-B223-84F0C4B57612

Q37433313-4E0D2E94-CA95-4647-9321-60A5A6406C66

Q37433313-65EB7299-9302-4DBD-8B57-16FFD0FA72A3

Q37433313-B35544B1-AC20-43C0-BA4A-C3B92602DA8C

Q37433313-B6E5B8F9-5EB2-4DA8-A68F-DF4D658B6F3F

Q37433313-C1A63B86-5707-45C9-9E8B-FD537EE93A15

Q37433313-CCC0BC72-89FF-40B3-AC1B-93362FE42A96

P304

Q37433313-7F9136EF-CD01-41A1-A089-D80116C9C96B

P31

Q37433313-51FC61E7-56D4-4AF8-B5DB-849556C84FCE

Q37433313-F0721793-E114-4471-881D-DE9C14694977

P356

Q37433313-0E546891-9DBB-45DB-9D4E-ED4F4703A208

P407

Q37433313-0516B268-EF52-4667-A5BD-D341A02D6267

P478

Q37433313-A5DDBDA9-206F-4767-9199-2301D343BB98

P50

Q37433313-94DFA9B9-3937-4F7C-B9BA-5D030797D605

Q37433313-99ECD937-BC2D-4A84-911D-34FF0DF18738

P577

Q37433313-0090C847-20CA-4BB5-A88F-377CEC3866A2

P5875

Q37433313-EFF81F14-1DAF-4883-A214-248EFDC8F140

P698

Q37433313-95067191-EB6B-4CBC-90AD-352999AAE2E0

P921

Q37433313-017F12B6-89A7-4B96-B746-55733164F699

P932

Q37433313-1B50E55B-0148-449E-AECF-C011A71B37DF

P356

P1433

P1476

Methodological problems in the ...... f published systematic reviews

@en

P2093

Alison J Eastwood

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Fujian Song

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Tanya Walsh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yoon K Loke

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial

P2860

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions

Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons

The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Indirect comparison in evaluating relative efficacy illustrated by antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence.

Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions.

Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.

A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation.

Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trials.

P304

b1147

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJ.B1147

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P478

338

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Anne-Marie Glenny

Douglas G. Altman

P577

2009-04-03T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

24257634

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

19346285

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

biomedical investigative technique

P932

2665205

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string