Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
about
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and urinary metabolites of organophosphate pesticidesCorrelated biomarker measurement error: an important threat to inference in environmental epidemiologyUrinary Phthalate Metabolite Concentrations and Reproductive Outcomes among Women Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization: Results from the EARTH StudyMeasurement Error and Environmental Epidemiology: A Policy PerspectiveEnvironmental risk score as a new tool to examine multi-pollutants in epidemiologic research: an example from the NHANES study using serum lipid levels.Maternal Concentrations of Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Fetal Markers of Metabolic Function and Birth Weight.Relationships between lead biomarkers and diurnal salivary cortisol indices in pregnant women from Mexico City: a cross-sectional study.Serum cotinine and whole blood folate concentrations in pregnancy.Solar ultraviolet-B radiation and vitamin D: a cross-sectional population-based study using data from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures SurveyStatistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer.Lower genital tract inflammatory milieu and the risk of subsequent preterm birth: an exploratory factor analysis.Maternal exposure to metals and persistent pollutants and cord blood immune system biomarkers.Evaluation of an Inexpensive Growth Medium for Direct Detection of Escherichia coli in Temperate and Sub-Tropical Waters.Urinary Bisphenol A Levels during Pregnancy and Risk of Preterm Birth.Maximum likelihood estimation in generalized linear models with multiple covariates subject to detection limitsLong-term immunologic and virologic responses on raltegravir-containing regimens among ART-experienced participants in the HIV Outpatient Study.Associations of blood and urinary mercury with hypertension in U.S. adults: the NHANES 2003-2006.Arsenic exposure and type 2 diabetes: results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey.Associations between Dietary Intake and Urinary Bisphenol A and Phthalates Levels in Korean Women of Reproductive Age.Multiple Imputation of a Randomly Censored Covariate Improves Logistic Regression Analysis.The change in plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D did not differ between breast-fed infants that received a daily supplement of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol for 3 months.A Bayesian Approach for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model with Covariates Subject to Detection LimitThe Association Between Urinary Benzophenone Concentrations and Personal Care Product Use in Korean Adults.Urinary Levels of 4-Nonylphenol and 4-t-Octylphenol in a Representative Sample of the Korean Adult Population.Incomplete viral suppression and mortality in HIV patients after antiretroviral therapy initiation.Estimation of exposure distribution adjusting for association between exposure level and detection limit.Minority stress and inflammatory mediators: covering moderates associations between perceived discrimination and salivary interleukin-6 in gay men.Gestational exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals in relation to infant birth weight: a Bayesian analysis of the HOME Study.Characteristics of users of supplements containing vitamin D in Canada and associations between dose and 25-hydroxvitamin D.Secondary sex ratio in relation to exposures to polychlorinated biphenyls, dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethylene and methylmercury.Early life Triclosan exposure and child adiposity at 8 Years of age: a prospective cohort study.Concentrations of 2,4-Dichlorophenol and 2,5-Dichlorophenol in Urine of Korean Adults.
P2860
Q24602033-C53A548C-61E1-4E41-9464-D41FFA6D7CE3Q28395261-05ABBC95-6EC9-4426-9ED5-650EBEFA1DAFQ28395963-3F5AAA7D-4296-4B83-AB90-96C2FE17CE64Q29248055-C450A4C2-9D72-4D18-AA70-E4C4A89E144EQ31164482-00D93F08-1A18-44A0-8A95-EFAC253ABF80Q33564787-ECDFE817-D40E-4151-9FEF-855E0750E7C4Q33799310-BD074D38-9AEB-4B34-9CE7-4629BB5B1F02Q33809063-1CE54F70-87E2-441D-8AD1-CD75EF85A3C7Q34380505-FCFB856F-DCE4-4A54-9D2A-2D3FED8490A5Q35064947-2CC53508-4AC7-465D-8520-487D5FF9B8B4Q35587717-5A705928-6859-44F7-89BE-A34844447189Q35750174-CF946600-66EE-42F8-B4A4-890C73C116A1Q35818662-1C47CAF2-CDC2-4C4C-A278-555EA1A1971CQ36027495-72A78607-8548-4E80-AFC5-B174901A60AFQ36032632-3FABD0AB-7E4E-4246-9120-B89B79862374Q36311771-850DC9DD-7DB6-4947-920D-9FB7114C7EC3Q36816190-BAEF8E2A-2A69-465C-BCDA-0C278E38BE51Q37011501-8C612382-514B-45EE-AB11-FCDAF6EEC1BEQ37128900-6392489D-0394-40A3-BEF6-E2C392890802Q37305738-E2BFB719-0AA2-43C0-86A5-C341DD6888CBQ37671345-7450D389-75DB-496E-93EA-BD25061D2579Q37721611-272F7763-26AF-4FC7-8D51-CAE191E7267BQ38420031-A55F025F-EDD7-4FFC-8ABB-9515AC77B70BQ38618534-C87B7A9C-BEFC-4EC7-8D62-52D4901553F7Q38709087-80CDD356-DF92-4777-B916-075CF5D91A76Q38781244-80CEDFB7-B821-45F2-ADAD-8BB1E4296198Q40618265-75B6A60C-4923-4F5D-B05A-9220D42783E5Q42617846-86F5DE6E-1236-42C7-9735-024B513159D5Q43462372-B15CFFD8-90A0-446D-9B37-06E56203883AQ47100459-0C0DDBD2-DC05-49F4-8681-3355D7F9AD66Q52689147-B2C20ED6-3A6A-49D9-A077-6253AD03FB3EQ53076907-BCD38B3F-096F-4562-AB6C-0E214F7C577E
P2860
Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 10 August 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
@en
Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
@nl
type
label
Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
@en
Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
@nl
prefLabel
Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
@en
Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
@en
P2093
Stephen R Cole
P2860
P304
P356
10.1093/IJE/DYP269
P577
2009-08-10T00:00:00Z