Difference in percentage of ventricular pacing between two algorithms for minimizing ventricular pacing: results of the IDEAL RVP (Identify the Best Algorithm for Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing) study.
about
The importance of avoiding unnecessary right ventricular pacing in clinical practice2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.Adverse effects of long-term right ventricular apical pacing and identification of patients at risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure.Minimizing right ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients with intact and compromised atrioventricular conduction : Results from the EVITA Trial.Cardiac pacing strategies and post-implantation risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure events in sinus node dysfunction patients: a collaborative analysis of over 6000 patients.Assessment of ventricular pacing in the setting of an institutional improvement program: insights into physiological pacing.Ventricular pacing: to pace or not to pace.Are plasma natriuretic peptide levels influenced by automatic pacemaker algorithms for ventricular pacing minimization?Minimizing ventricular pacing by a novel atrioventricular (AV) delay hysteresis algorithm in patients with intact or compromised intrinsic AV conduction and different atrial and ventricular lead locations.Cardiac resynchronization therapy in pacemaker-dependent patients with left ventricular dysfunction.Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.The prescription of minimal ventricular pacing.Reduction of right ventricular pacing with advanced atrioventricular search hysteresis: results of the PREVENT study.2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing
P2860
Q26851233-787DC299-4BB6-4FF0-B942-8703E699A554Q36594611-6FAAF554-3D09-4E42-AD47-550A63379705Q37997450-38EAFA1C-E649-4B83-9555-BD08B9A88C78Q38405030-58828D14-F2E8-4D17-8119-623A059266A1Q38749348-43765979-5DCE-45E6-B4E9-283074BA4CF3Q42578534-D8405DBE-FF8C-45AC-81C8-DF3B8E1BA3CCQ42953950-B4A2DEAB-E974-4F27-A331-BB4D8A7D0D21Q43578586-9BC79155-11BF-40FD-B64D-3BDC3CE9F832Q44901534-1714391C-2EA1-45C2-8ED3-47FA8AC47F7EQ45282222-DF03D89E-D43F-43DA-AAAB-90F60576484DQ51096218-AD0F4EB3-AF05-4204-BD63-554B62EA2AF1Q51332535-FA0D6B0D-C8BE-43D3-8B30-01421BB9D0BFQ51585627-9AE37CD4-B081-409B-8251-753506F8624CQ58819090-F5778EAD-0F44-4CB0-B6AA-DB2D9C4BAF4B
P2860
Difference in percentage of ventricular pacing between two algorithms for minimizing ventricular pacing: results of the IDEAL RVP (Identify the Best Algorithm for Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing) study.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on January 2010
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Difference in percentage of ve ...... ght Ventricular Pacing) study.
@en
Difference in percentage of ve ...... cing: results of the IDEAL RVP
@nl
type
label
Difference in percentage of ve ...... ght Ventricular Pacing) study.
@en
Difference in percentage of ve ...... cing: results of the IDEAL RVP
@nl
prefLabel
Difference in percentage of ve ...... ght Ventricular Pacing) study.
@en
Difference in percentage of ve ...... cing: results of the IDEAL RVP
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Difference in percentage of ve ...... ight Ventricular Pacing) study
@en
P2093
Mitsuaki Takami
Naoya Tsuboi
Toyoaki Murohara
Yasuya Inden
Yoshimasa Murakami
Yukihiko Yoshida
P2860
P304
P356
10.1093/EUROPACE/EUP252
P577
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z