Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37481846

about

The value of data collection within a palliative care program Influence of data quality on computed Dutch hospital quality indicators: a case study in colorectal cancer surgery TNM-O: ontology support for staging of malignant tumours.Audit and feedback intervention: An examination of differences in chiropractic record-keeping compliance.How Does Managed Care Improve the Quality of Breast Cancer Care Among Medicare-Insured Minority Women?The truth, the whole truth, and the medical record.Developing a national database for metastatic colorectal cancer management: perspectives and challenges.

P2860

Q27010360-4CBBFE28-606E-49DC-97C9-5ED26F20A030 Q30798214-73F24311-FDB7-4767-A2F1-7206263F0A0E Q37414684-9C73F00D-9E67-4E6B-A99F-85DCC0B8F4EC Q38209958-B2CA631E-9188-41D1-8E0B-1D19A8A1D9C2 Q39688373-045263C8-18FB-46A8-B1F3-FDC10BF19B9A Q41886469-9B972D93-DF62-461B-BCB9-531C7A251210 Q53107300-4CF1BE4B-B357-4346-9E60-5E7621BD419B

P2860

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37481846

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@pt

bilimsel makale

@tr

scientific article published on July 2009

@en

vedecký článok

@sk

vetenskaplig artikel

@sv

videnskabelig artikel

@da

vědecký článek

@cs

name

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

@en

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

@nl

type

label

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

@en

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

@nl

prefLabel

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

@en

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

@nl

P1433

Q37481846-D94C0E60-F2F9-4FE8-BFAD-F34134F61AA8

P1476

Q37481846-4CB55607-9F8A-402B-88A8-B22FD06CA9C6

P2093

Q37481846-1F7203F2-33F2-4003-AB96-6BBA01736D33

Q37481846-260970EF-3944-4EC9-800F-BD61CCFD71FA

Q37481846-3E08F695-DB76-420D-94BD-A4B7149796BF

Q37481846-65427E79-ABA5-41CA-9B23-E4B96F4C6B00

Q37481846-FA3BC648-C896-4D5D-985C-671BC2DE4F42

P2860

Q37481846-19D7E84C-F088-41FD-8905-F95C4ADEA36A

Q37481846-482DA8D7-0F79-4C1E-B8A2-BC22D605A17E

Q37481846-99CD6A55-D103-4619-BBFA-267038EC5A45

Q37481846-C50FA330-FE26-43A0-9143-F63AAE386CCE

Q37481846-C523C62F-9F5B-447D-8DE6-8E8157A8D13B

Q37481846-D368727D-F54F-4BBB-9F24-7591BB93DC30

P304

Q37481846-172D56E1-D2AF-4983-B32E-E9234FAC2307

P31

Q37481846-70538C02-23E3-4FB5-88A3-039B2085061E

P356

Q37481846-0408D716-B870-4B40-9FC4-F65DF4C416E7

P407

Q37481846-9392CC81-829C-485C-B0E8-D3343EE3E005

P433

Q37481846-502C8E0D-093F-45FC-99B5-FD5B00916957

P478

Q37481846-4DBDD088-B686-4496-8152-EF017267B51A

P50

Q37481846-4F982F1D-40CA-40E6-84C7-11859BA0D16B

P577

Q37481846-0AB0D4A6-8449-49CB-863F-9B29D75DEADD

P5875

Q37481846-0037EC22-66F4-4135-A57D-938BECCB88B4

P698

Q37481846-34E00CA1-6B62-4279-97C7-C4B684A73385

P921

Q37481846-D5A5783F-EB2F-4294-88CA-10C0FC9BA83B

P932

Q37481846-6C1A0D7D-DE31-4ECA-9630-B34A8E6B8141

P356

P1433

Journal of Oncology Practice

P1476

Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer.

@en

P2093

James E Herndon

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jane L Wheeler

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jennifer Marcello

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Krista Rowe

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Meenal Patwardhan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Reassessing the methods of medical record review studies in emergency medicine research.

Traditional medical records as a source of clinical data in the outpatient setting

Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?

How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.

Advanced chronic kidney disease practice patterns among nephrologists and non-nephrologists: a database analysis.

P304

167-174

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1200/JOP.0942003

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

5

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Amy P. Abernethy

P577

2009-07-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

46382143

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

20856630

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

colorectal cancer

P932

2795422

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string