Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
about
Models to Tailor Brain Stimulation Therapies in StrokeApplication of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurorehabilitation: The Modulatory Effect of SleepThe contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studiesNeural substrates underlying stimulation-enhanced motor skill learning after stroke.Non-invasive brain stimulation: an interventional tool for enhancing behavioral training after strokeTranscranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke.Studying the effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in stroke recovery using magnetic resonance imaging.Can Neurological Biomarkers of Brain Impairment Be Used to Predict Poststroke Motor Recovery? A Systematic Review.The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulationGABA levels are decreased after stroke and GABA changes during rehabilitation correlate with motor improvement.Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation: local and distant effects for motor recovery.Polarity specific effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on interhemispheric inhibitionUsing clinical and robotic assessment tools to examine the feasibility of pairing tDCS with upper extremity physical therapy in patients with stroke and TBI: a consideration-of-concept pilot study.Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on visually guided learning of grip force control.Multisession Anodal tDCS Protocol Improves Motor System Function in an Aging Population.Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?Aerobic training as a means to enhance inhibition: what's yet to be studied?Simultaneous tDCS-fMRI Identifies Resting State Networks Correlated with Visual Search Enhancement.The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: conventional vs. unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation.Spared Primary Motor Cortex and The Presence of MEP in Cerebral Palsy Dictate the Responsiveness to tDCS during Gait Training.No Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Motor Cortex on Response-Related ERPs during a Conflict Task.γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentration inversely correlates with basal perfusion in human occipital lobe.Lesion location associated with balance recovery and gait velocity change after rehabilitation in stroke patients.Noninvasive Neuromodulation in Poststroke Gait Disorders: Rationale, Feasibility, and State of the Art.Transcranial direct current stimulation as a motor neurorehabilitation tool: an empirical review.Consensus statement on current and emerging methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of cerebrovascular disease.Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation on the proximal upper limb.Anatomical Parameters of tDCS to Modulate the Motor System after Stroke: A Review.Modulation of physiological mirror activity with transcranial direct current stimulation over dorsal premotor cortex.tDCS and Robotics on Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Effect Modification by Stroke Duration and Type of Stroke.Induced sensorimotor cortex plasticity remediates chronic treatment-resistant visual neglect.Cooperation Not Competition: Bihemispheric tDCS and fMRI Show Role for Ipsilateral Hemisphere in Motor Learning.Bihemispheric Motor Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Force Steadiness in Post-Stroke Hemiparetic Patients: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial.Modulating hemispheric lateralization by brain stimulation yields gain in mental and physical activity.Neurochemical changes underpinning the development of adjunct therapies in recovery after stroke: A role for GABA?Using transcranial direct current stimulation to treat symptoms in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.State dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on methamphetamine craving.The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation.Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: a Promising Approach for Stroke Recovery?Effects of different montages of transcranial direct current stimulation on the risk of falls and lower limb function after stroke.
P2860
Q26752415-982106CD-6B0A-4805-903E-A67EADF62192Q26752553-F1698C1B-8592-4B45-9711-9A73DA6F2309Q26827189-62EE9114-C136-4F90-A5A3-104896A7D57FQ27303951-A47EB82F-8293-4733-A46C-95F0CC25FD40Q28082620-99391D1B-0065-4B84-BBEF-A21422930D8CQ30705609-AF15D453-B3B1-483F-B56E-438905FC9CC4Q30724723-6693F7E1-073F-4CB5-B6A1-D6BE84224DBAQ31120470-D9494145-BE06-40BF-B3B4-B573C3D9E52BQ33660513-24394AB3-8C47-4302-B5A2-2DE4963B768CQ33698708-0E8EC3C9-B23A-4814-846A-60C3FCCA5259Q33813339-1F8D76C0-15E8-4155-A461-3B0970825006Q34640566-A5DC9238-B06B-4634-814B-3B56F2822403Q34717940-04B222B9-3406-4E86-8453-7AEB9E5DFFFAQ35237408-530D5694-2712-4971-B886-943948AC7C26Q36532125-9C268575-AAB5-4B84-BA48-FFED78B2BCAAQ36536580-37B29605-83BA-4E5B-B175-03513DB53CAEQ36565276-764C0559-76B2-4EFE-B3A7-70C8F4D7AA24Q36656521-1277DA29-36D2-40D2-8E94-FFF19EFB7956Q36912290-6D5A26A1-8BEC-4AEF-9B6C-595ED714324FQ37104458-974094E9-8235-4F85-8E33-16FAAAA4A3AFQ37153318-68079765-A877-482D-A4EE-6ADB1D9D2140Q37627783-B11CF412-4584-4238-9BD1-0320B2461670Q38402678-1B7D9B71-3387-41A7-89DD-071B916F4D64Q38476216-CC4F7427-E87F-4AC0-9619-60784CD6A018Q38613694-FF22A7B3-915E-4995-9EEB-07D27207E8AAQ38641106-29DB53F7-DB10-4E4C-82EA-9EB600321A52Q38922591-39975E9B-92BF-496A-AA91-310D0A2AAC36Q39148606-3268EF3B-0FD0-49FB-94E6-5CA3D5876E0AQ39450603-6462F561-E407-42A9-9424-579161F0DE1CQ40139908-F07E4918-1C1A-4375-ADD9-4233CF31B815Q41221919-A8415676-3AD0-4B18-BC97-B01404C01FE1Q41275813-2B7AA72A-7508-4A4F-B25D-1DED9FD85395Q41408923-388AB518-D7C1-4180-B368-6491BC34C06CQ42677165-4C7B85E0-D161-4E60-A14A-66C33FC71818Q47568672-1BA99376-689F-4327-8B08-198454456801Q47594651-57AA1FE2-5EFB-4BAA-B0B7-C70550CF4BA4Q47770119-3E145401-40A7-40BE-97D9-203C2E969E84Q47901827-0DA6EE4C-A341-40E9-B22E-E543FD17790DQ47914886-60312052-FAEF-4C16-8E27-04027CDE6A07Q48104172-BFC02365-877E-45A5-8235-5EE10893FF41
P2860
Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 30 May 2013
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
@en
Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
@nl
type
label
Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
@en
Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
@nl
prefLabel
Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
@en
Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
@nl
P2860
P50
P1433
P1476
Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.
@en
P2093
Marie-Hélène Boudrias
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2013.05.096
P407
P478
P577
2013-05-30T00:00:00Z