Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study.

Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37552998

about

Psychometric properties of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture in Norwegian nursing homes Implementation of recommended type 2 diabetes care for people with severe mental illness - a qualitative exploration with healthcare professionals Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play Facilitators and Barriers to Safe Medication Administration to Hospital Inpatients: A Mixed Methods Study of Nurses' Medication Administration Processes and Systems (the MAPS Study)Multimethod study of a large-scale programme to improve patient safety using a harm-free care approach Participatory design facilitates Person Centred Nursing in service improvement with older people: a secondary directed content analysis.Understanding staff perspectives of quality in practice in healthcare Using real-time, anonymous staff feedback to improve staff experience and engagement Improving Hospital at Home for frail older people: insights from a quality improvement project to achieve change across regional health and social care sectors.Managing hospital doctors and their practice: what can we learn about human resource management from non-healthcare organisations?Why is patient safety so hard in low-income countries? A qualitative study of healthcare workers' views in two African hospitals Using clinical supervision to improve the quality and safety of patient care: a response to Berwick and Francis The public's voice about healthcare quality regulation policies. A population-based survey A stepped wedge, cluster controlled trial of an intervention to improve safety and quality on medical wards: the HEADS-UP study protocol.Beyond metrics? Utilizing 'soft intelligence' for healthcare quality and safety.Exploring the concept of "caring cultures": A critical examination of the conceptual, methodological and validity issues with the "caring cultures" construct.Whistleblowing Need not Occur if Internal Voices Are Heard: From Deaf Effect to Hearer Courage: Comment on "Cultures of Silence and Cultures of Voice: The Role of Whistleblowing in Healthcare Organisations".Antimicrobial stewardship: are we failing in cross-specialty clinical engagement?What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi-site ethnographic study Strengthening leadership as a catalyst for enhanced patient safety culture: a repeated cross-sectional experimental study A study of attitudes, beliefs and organisational barriers related to safe emergency oxygen therapy for patients with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in clinical practice and research.Walkrounds in practice: corrupting or enhancing a quality improvement intervention? A qualitative study Patients' perspectives on the role of their complaints in the regulatory process.Developing the 'gripes' tool for junior doctors to report concerns: a pilot study Exploration of contextual factors in a successful quality improvement collaborative in English ambulance services: cross-sectional survey.Status of patient safety culture in Arab countries: a systematic review.Neurohospitalists and patient safety: lessons learned in 2013.End-of-life care decisions for haemodialysis patients - 'We only tend to have that discussion with them when they start deteriorating'.Running a hospital patient safety campaign: a qualitative study.The Patient Feedback Response Framework - Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study.Adverse events in healthcare: learning from mistakes.The use of patient feedback by hospital boards of directors: a qualitative study of two NHS hospitals in England.How do hospital boards govern for quality improvement? A mixed methods study of 15 organisations in England."They just said inappropriate contact." What do service users hear when staff talk about sex and relationships?Exploring how ward staff engage with the implementation of a patient safety intervention: a UK-based qualitative process evaluation A qualitative study on the implementation of quality systems in Australian hospitals.Translating concerns into action: a detailed qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary intervention on medical wards.How to implement live video recording in the clinical environment: A practical guide for clinical services.Perioperative hypothermia in neonatal intensive care unit patients: effectiveness of a thermoregulation intervention and associated risk factors.Confidentiality, anonymity and amnesty for midwives in distress seeking online support - Ethical?

P2860

Q26779494-703EEE6A-B6A6-441A-ACE3-3B3DDCD93B2C Q27310938-33079944-46EB-4A94-B7E9-321A04F775A5 Q28073203-C5E22E8B-7E4D-4463-A49B-80DB805C38CD Q28548538-BDAC93F2-BA58-44A2-931B-C0DB856761DF Q28597935-BFE7120D-30C2-4846-8F10-A82368602409 Q30388174-1E19B581-0B15-49C9-A339-B09D5ED97BBD Q30642632-341D60D6-2345-4DF7-8368-BE20623EE27E Q33622380-DCE63F01-D36C-4926-9437-C00F8F9B3B90 Q33767853-6DFE2542-40DA-46AB-971C-1BD95E7ABF45 Q34578889-8698972F-D365-4027-AA6A-3E0C1444FA79 Q35147840-68409B16-1DB9-4CC4-9805-F5276293FC1B Q35660385-903A2DF5-A94C-49EE-9E76-0F780AEA33D8 Q35745633-BC28182B-41FE-494E-ABCE-7809D6FFCEBE Q35778818-0C071C61-C1A8-4D27-A118-825B889A94F9 Q36076289-D51BC5BD-A12F-4E07-B196-78CA7C15E18F Q36351672-9358917D-82A3-4B32-AEE4-C7C3CC4C3E7D Q36366368-07A25232-BEF5-481E-B469-C72078C5A87A Q36455343-10F68336-4F5E-4AA2-985C-0219B54CC062 Q36584615-450A25C3-E8E6-4EB6-AEBB-3681B85664E6 Q36920086-FA205800-C030-4729-8986-AEB489689596 Q36933280-606EBA64-4812-4B0F-8FAA-4D37BD789132 Q37021021-DC965000-5BCD-4C7D-A648-7D03F0B0158B Q37321374-A4FB96DB-11E2-42A5-B048-55A87506677E Q37412730-75ADD221-8009-48D4-A328-7BFC7B2CB9A1 Q37561635-F7B8239B-83E8-4172-BC15-AAA08A2E4D7E Q37681415-CCFDD262-3F3B-41E7-95B3-F98B0238A312 Q37684851-765C6C3D-9203-4295-9FB4-920EBEFD35DE Q37705168-AD82AE5E-270D-4A06-8048-F2C949DE14A8 Q37705425-B536FC48-C02A-49B7-86B5-D6F615D54158 Q37713816-E2FEBACC-67BD-46E2-A8BF-2E931561219A Q38235523-3B4C9069-E1F6-45BD-80FF-32057166B5EC Q38654328-831FEEE8-70A4-49BD-95BC-60FAE6AC1891 Q38660887-F491EF90-901E-4AAF-9A5D-779383DB81AE Q38674320-355D3798-E26C-4629-A07A-AFDB3D463B6E Q38678207-5908F869-2C05-4B3A-8E00-E80D264AE3EF Q38684659-36458D29-69A5-4A6D-8232-F6C3113DA38E Q38733858-09194651-4A62-4B8A-9B59-0CA39948B3EB Q38775079-E52CF0B1-2392-4B05-AF50-5372DAE6C74F Q38787261-8711B50E-46A3-40EA-8B9F-0DE32FE9323D Q38885886-CB9CF4C4-A117-4A88-A2F2-0F0D8B246CE0

P2860

Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37552998

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@pt

bilimsel makale

@tr

scientific article published on 09 September 2013

@en

vedecký článok

@sk

vetenskaplig artikel

@sv

videnskabelig artikel

@da

vědecký článek

@cs

name

Culture and behaviour in the E ...... rom a large multimethod study.

@en

Culture and behaviour in the E ...... rom a large multimethod study.

@nl

type

label

Culture and behaviour in the E ...... rom a large multimethod study.

@en

Culture and behaviour in the E ...... rom a large multimethod study.

@nl

prefLabel

Culture and behaviour in the E ...... rom a large multimethod study.

@en

Culture and behaviour in the E ...... rom a large multimethod study.

@nl

P1433

Q37552998-F58F116E-F9EA-468E-B316-D4E84E496A3C

P1476

Q37552998-19E4B9D2-B279-46F2-80F6-10C9CEB367D4

P2093

Q37552998-2411C951-0159-449B-9A70-B2E36D8A00F9

Q37552998-304D16A7-6B87-4902-86C2-1B92F3F756E5

Q37552998-55ABFAF9-044F-41E3-AEDA-146DF55742BF

Q37552998-93EB45FA-0534-44C3-B1A1-BF14CA6A1DA7

Q37552998-CF3CF91C-7AC6-4808-BA2A-947EB4E0DB8A

Q37552998-D4CA8B2E-CDB7-4CC4-BBDF-79A89FB3830C

Q37552998-E6DAAC80-DEF8-40BB-B655-CCEA9C23354F

Q37552998-F29CDF06-2F80-4B59-951F-40344BA7745C

P2860

Q37552998-0BBDFCE0-6E7A-4F42-9A98-FAABCB5E706A

Q37552998-2026F223-35A2-4347-AF56-F8D28B8138FA

Q37552998-294BC30A-3426-42A0-B513-749A070BB16E

Q37552998-35EC2DEC-B4F6-438A-839F-D8C9199481F6

Q37552998-436359C3-9ED5-4D2B-AEED-D1F73EC7A7F4

Q37552998-5FCB56AC-8297-4544-99BF-FB0BAADF4D64

Q37552998-62B9A0DA-90AF-469B-9741-3CE93C816A72

Q37552998-694BEEEF-B39B-4FA7-ADCE-E72A603FEA36

Q37552998-6C636DE3-E23A-411A-B089-1F97F9448401

Q37552998-72AA841A-E266-44EF-BF0F-630560EA8C19

P304

Q37552998-2C092DBF-E5AB-4A73-94C3-AC6161FF7200

P31

Q37552998-2183E7D7-8A48-4FA5-AEBE-A09091EA2A77

P356

Q37552998-7DDAFCC7-4B9D-40CC-8657-5C457B392953

P433

Q37552998-3A77AD1F-C39A-4838-B2AB-A8698C76BD11

P478

Q37552998-F3F4551E-C38C-447A-B769-B801256B1D2A

P50

Q37552998-3A59CCE6-A1C0-4187-AF41-7719625F9757

Q37552998-74CC987D-47C2-4C3D-BA0D-386DB3A8047E

Q37552998-C20FC439-16D2-4100-934C-B9E8F8790EB1

Q37552998-D0F3D499-699F-42E2-A6AC-381FEC2F613D

Q37552998-DF39E227-E798-4199-9B35-EC8861CCA33E

P577

Q37552998-6C23BD44-48B2-4698-B351-A6FEFFD335D6

P5875

Q37552998-6F6C3955-BB6D-4DAE-8242-56E9C82CF588

P698

Q37552998-D362C7AB-1843-4FCF-A6FA-2C3281A77BAC

P932

Q37552998-DCE48AF3-0E81-4BD1-A260-755B7D8DF88C

P356

BMJQS-2013-001947

P1433

BMJ Quality & Safety

P1476

Culture and behaviour in the E ...... from a large multimethod study

@en

P2093

Gabi Jerzembek

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Graham Martin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Janet Willars

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jeremy Dawson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Joel Minion

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lorna McKee

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Patricia Wilkie

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Richard Baker

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

What counts? An ethnographic study of infection data reported to a patient safety program

Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups.

Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies.

Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: the effects of top management, board, and physician leadership.

When things go wrong: how health care organizations deal with major failures.

Multiple component patient safety intervention in English hospitals: controlled evaluation of second phase

Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation

The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review.

Patient safety at ten: unmistakable progress, troubling gaps.

Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program

P304

106-115

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJQS-2013-001947

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

23

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Mary Dixon-Woods

Kathryn Charles

Piotr Ozierański

Imelda McCarthy

P577

2013-09-09T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

256481841

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

24019507

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3913222

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string