A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency.
about
Generalization versus specialization in pollination systems: visitors, thieves, and pollinators of Hypoestes aristata (Acanthaceae)Climate-driven spatial mismatches between British orchards and their pollinators: increased risks of pollination deficits.Sensitivity of commercial pumpkin yield to potential decline among different groups of pollinating bees.Evaluation of common methods for sampling invertebrate pollinator assemblages: net sampling out-perform pan traps.Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation.Spatial and temporal trends of global pollination benefit.Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination.The endangered Iris atropurpurea (Iridaceae) in Israel: honey-bees, night-sheltering male bees and female solitary bees as pollinators.Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color, flower scent and flower morphology of Hemerocallis: evidence from genotyping individual pollen grains on the stigma.Managed bumblebees outperform honeybees in increasing peach fruit set in China: different limiting processes with different pollinatorsHairiness: the missing link between pollinators and pollinationPollination Services of Mango Flower Pollinators.Butterflies visit more frequently, but bees are better pollinators: the importance of mouthpart dimensions in effective pollen removal and deposition.Novel adaptation to hawkmoth pollinators in Clarkia reduces efficiency, not attraction of diurnal visitors.Pollinator importance networks illustrate the crucial value of bees in a highly speciose plant communityGinger and the beetle: Evidence of primitive pollination system in a Himalayan endemic alpine ginger (Roscoea alpina, Zingiberaceae).Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea.Evaluation of pollinator effectiveness based on pollen deposition and seed production in a gynodieocious alpine plant, Cyananthus delavayi.The effect of removing numerically dominant, non-native honey bees on seed set of a native plant.Adding landscape genetics and individual traits to the ecosystem function paradigm reveals the importance of species functional breadth.Stingless Bees as Alternative Pollinators of Canola.Small and surrounded: population size and land use intensity interact to determine reliance on autonomous selfing in a monocarpic plant.Pollination by fungus gnats and associated floral characteristics in five families of the Japanese flora.The worldwide importance of honey bees as pollinators in natural habitats.Pollination benefits are maximized at intermediate nutrient levels.One fly to rule them all-muscid flies are the key pollinators in the Arctic.Synergistic effects of non-Apis bees and honey bees for pollination services.Constructing more informative plant-pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community.Toward an integrated approach to crop production and pollination ecology through the application of remote sensingBusy Bees: Variation in Insect Flower-Visiting Rates across Multiple Plant Species
P2860
Q27334013-DF265516-EE9B-4E62-8C23-14232ED27371Q30779996-BA5811D4-F500-436D-B972-F0A15EDCA65DQ30854193-5CF73F9F-4374-4D91-8E03-0AC2DD4AC284Q31121207-5A85A2C3-3C9C-4B65-9A80-E6C3CBAB652FQ34044269-AED96DFC-CE0D-425E-A5E1-BED821C1EC5CQ34259864-AAB04895-987B-446B-B35D-FF1FB0B0EE91Q34503595-5367D6C7-0673-4B92-962E-285B417AC7D5Q34527661-2C267DFE-913A-4357-BD27-49134D8807A5Q35078617-C860DAFA-877F-482C-9F8E-7D8C9D22A3BFQ35208149-AEE0B88B-348E-4E08-B2E9-F5DEB32D1CE9Q36234200-D8DB7263-8C04-4483-8542-3A3B0DCFE7C5Q36353299-3475E7FE-427E-4A6E-ABD9-E13A87CC4B39Q36654523-38191AC0-7D28-424C-914D-FEC5766E8918Q37473281-3EDD8F5D-4CB8-412B-A718-413AC5660860Q38615336-EFDEC6DA-0528-4648-BFEA-BA6D9D970E4FQ38671905-7A41E0D4-469C-4618-9462-AAB473599099Q40425429-3BD48937-FB6B-4FFE-A224-68B9217C2BA0Q42671226-1CAEA342-EA55-4335-BEC4-6381E0C42AF0Q46259854-AE04444A-8874-46C2-BC28-EF9F106B78F2Q46263626-2E91B97E-B8DD-40E8-9701-1D20CBFDCFA5Q46653915-279462DF-12CB-4FCF-B20A-C001B18B0317Q49964624-768A47E9-5CFA-48E3-A1A0-CF88EC7EA664Q50120221-0432AEBF-BC1E-4233-975F-401ECF06305EQ51158679-F8E998AA-DD31-468A-A04D-4F4AA901E979Q51186866-D301304E-D567-421D-A6E6-A56FED12A37DQ51263553-97A60C08-18D6-42A7-8B76-C740103DAECAQ51540525-BBBC3E96-A5A2-4BF2-B560-C10C21811B24Q52817358-2DE0BE99-1163-476B-84AF-917B15165771Q58589867-914096EF-4463-4BAD-9647-75FAC1C6DF82Q59120442-E451F6FA-DE8C-4622-B937-45C6FFB90E0B
P2860
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 09 December 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency.
@en
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency.
@nl
type
label
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency.
@en
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency.
@nl
prefLabel
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency.
@en
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency.
@en
P2093
Amots Dafni
Andreas Jürgens
Gidi Ne'eman
Linda Newstrom-Lloyd
Simon G Potts
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1469-185X.2009.00108.X
P577
2009-12-09T00:00:00Z