Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.

Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37676087
Children's rights in pediatrics.Central Precocious Puberty and Response to GnRHa Therapy in Children with Cerebral Palsy and Moderate to Severe Motor Impairment: Data from a Longitudinal, Case-Control, Multicentre, Italian Study.Lived experiences of Jordanian mothers caring for a child with disability.Parental reasoning about growth attenuation therapy: report of a single-case study.Ethics or advocacy?What took so long? The disability critique recognized.What role should moral intuitions play when dealing with children?Revisiting the relevance of the social model of disability.Ashley's interests were not violated because she does not have the necessary interests.The limits of parental authority?Putting law in the room.Growth attenuation: good intentions, bad decision.It's not the growth attenuation, it's the sterilization!Reasons to Amplify the Role of Parental Permission in Pediatric Treatment.
P2860

Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37676087
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on January 2010
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.
@en
Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.
@nl
type
label
Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.
@en
Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.
@nl
prefLabel
Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.
@en
Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.
@nl
P1433
P1476
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P577
P698
P356
P1433
P1476
Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P577
P698