The impact of interventions to improve attendance in female cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: a review.
about
The Possible Effects on Socio-Economic Inequalities of Introducing HPV Testing as Primary Test in Cervical Cancer Screening ProgramsMethods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review.Home visits to improve breast health knowledge and screening practices in a less privileged area in Jordan.Get screened: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to increase mammography and colorectal cancer screening in a large, safety net practice.A pilot telephone intervention to increase uptake of breast cancer screening in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study.The socioeconomic determinants of cancer.The validity of self-reported cancer screening history and the role of social disadvantage in Ontario, CanadaDo community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic reviewText-message reminders increase uptake of routine breast screening appointments: a randomised controlled trial in a hard-to-reach population.HPV prevalence and risk of pre-cancer and cancer in regular immigrants in Italy: results from HPV DNA test-based screening pilot programs.Age differences in mammography screening reconsidered: life course trajectories in 13 European countries.Factors affecting attendance to cervical cancer screening among women in the Paracentral Region of El Salvador: a nested study within the CAPE HPV screening programCervical Cancer Screening Among Adult Women in China, 2010.An empirical study of the 'underscreened' in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening ratesCost-effectiveness of strategies to increase screening coverage for cervical cancer in Spain: the CRIVERVA study.Beliefs, perceptions and health-seeking behaviours in relation to cervical cancer: a qualitative study among women in Uganda following completion of an HPV vaccination campaign.Introducing a High-Risk HPV DNA Test Into a Public Sector Screening Program in El SalvadorEliminating disparities in cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results: what will it take?Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women.Using Best-Worst Scaling to Understand Patient Priorities: A Case Example of Papanicolaou Tests for Homeless Women.Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice.Changes in the magnitude of social inequality in the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Taiwan, a country implementing a population-based organized screening program.Primary Health Care and Cervical Cancer Mortality Rates in Brazil: A Longitudinal Ecological Study.Interventions to reach underscreened populations: a narrative review for planning cancer screening initiatives.Prevalence and implications of multiple cancer screening needs among Hispanic community health center patients.Variations in preventive care utilisation in EuropeRapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services.Screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors in an urban low-income setting at baseline and post intervention: a prospective intervention study.Effects of an extended free-of-fee strategy on the rate of cervical Papanicolaou smear screening in Israel.Screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors at baseline and post intervention among adults with intellectual disabilities in an urbanised Asian society.Are cervical and breast cancer screening programmes equitable? The case of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.Perceived Risk of Cervical Cancer and Barriers to Screening among Secondary School Female Teachers in Al Hassa, Saudi ArabiaThe social gradient in preventive healthcare use: what can we learn from socially mobile individuals?Reconsidering inequalities in preventive health care: an application of cultural health capital theory and the life-course perspective to the take-up of mammography screening.Creating awareness and facilitating cervical and breast cancer screening uptake through the use of a Community Health Worker: a pilot intervention study.The role of learning disability nurses in promoting cervical screening uptake in women with intellectual disabilities: A qualitative study.Eighteen-year follow-up of the Göteborg Randomized Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial: effect of sociodemographic variables on participation, prostate cancer incidence and mortality.Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates—Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a ‘One Stop’ Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer.
P2860
Q26851181-503B1F59-56F0-4161-94DE-8E121C748AD4Q30540772-707D4B66-6BE5-4CB8-B1A5-DAE72CDBA8E8Q30588311-4E1F3453-4DAE-4062-9E37-745F4032A5ACQ33653593-46D69CED-CF7E-4498-8C8A-015BD40A2A5AQ33701067-16153957-F3A2-4D86-BBF0-72B2F8BD6848Q34085068-3E8CF407-165D-4913-B2AD-BDE7A4771D3FQ34150594-7D851B62-1002-422C-82B6-63298D84BF40Q34775259-B0B9749A-AB04-4DB7-82DF-A19BEBAAD9B6Q35056254-9E3E848A-0B83-4C54-B6FE-06D4AE44CEB9Q35156828-F7E9B472-E214-4185-B679-404037D1D307Q35198330-99E2FCB3-01B6-4F4B-B261-229A83FD37F6Q35595268-13F1A413-6B6E-4BB5-83D6-6FD771D1E0FBQ35661845-86665238-7341-4C67-8CF6-BD5EAC31BC51Q35810801-D6E4A86E-43FB-4748-A6F1-E5E65544B172Q36064824-6EE35F26-508B-47E1-B55D-A84A43E22CF2Q36156934-02404E50-DF91-44EA-86D6-CAE3406FACCAQ36280255-F98B12AE-61C8-486B-AC92-E6068978113BQ36596319-FEC1775B-CBAB-43C3-BB0D-388FA9F54EE6Q36761623-3A67F034-7461-452A-B583-5B7AE72BD764Q36824432-9C50648F-ADBD-42CA-A50B-8B1B4C3942D5Q37055607-00EC8B3D-C70D-4623-85D4-F83E37D738A6Q37084071-FA0D0AE9-AE3B-46AF-AF9E-62D2CF4B99B2Q37471444-06F7A2C4-B944-4F0B-9B92-EB35902416F6Q37497338-2A26CD63-7CEA-4B07-A6CB-90BE816642DAQ37682727-67AF0A1E-3C75-4030-B617-4EB25E560D2CQ38364891-2852006F-A465-49AD-8C6E-122EC35CE73FQ38422416-40032462-9651-4C45-B40A-405FB0EAA125Q38626694-FD14C148-67C6-400D-9D80-776AD49C5BF3Q38984080-2A183CA0-DECB-46A3-9530-028E97BA823BQ40022128-D8D15615-E909-412D-9A74-908EAAC33BB1Q40074722-FDC186A0-5290-4B71-8B8F-DE4C4B9E8F32Q40083270-5E51B5CF-9D75-4241-84FF-7AEC3A6D1A1CQ40098954-71EB0CBC-7355-473B-A582-A711FE63DC21Q40473370-8D4EFB2A-B082-48DD-8C7E-BB0D6FB3898EQ40681209-C744B4A9-C742-4B0F-903F-FBDF133548CEQ41732249-8A9A16B8-FFEE-4702-8B5A-243D6D9E19D8Q45445260-94039558-883E-49AB-9765-D4495394309CQ46001431-5B448BAB-1AD3-4457-B0CD-2BA29B30491EQ47288274-C033D451-CD6A-41B5-9D33-C0A2FA98FD3EQ47382778-8BDCD613-318E-48D0-A6AC-A1BAAC743A9B
P2860
The impact of interventions to improve attendance in female cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: a review.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 20 January 2010
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
The impact of interventions to ...... ocioeconomic groups: a review.
@en
The impact of interventions to ...... ocioeconomic groups: a review.
@nl
type
label
The impact of interventions to ...... ocioeconomic groups: a review.
@en
The impact of interventions to ...... ocioeconomic groups: a review.
@nl
prefLabel
The impact of interventions to ...... ocioeconomic groups: a review.
@en
The impact of interventions to ...... ocioeconomic groups: a review.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
The impact of interventions to ...... socioeconomic groups: a review
@en
P2093
Anton Kunst
Giuseppe Costa
Irina Stirbu
Silvia Bellini
P304
P356
10.1016/J.YPMED.2010.01.007
P407
P50
P577
2010-01-20T00:00:00Z