Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?
about
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journalsThe reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimatesReporting characteristics of cancer pain: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals.Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD.A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literatureFraming of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature.Double balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: an updated meta-analysis.Screening for gastric cancer and surveillance of premalignant lesions: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies.Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria.Adherence to reporting guidelines in observational studies concerning exposure to persistent organic pollutants and effects on semen parameters.The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in pelvic floor transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound: a systematic review.The framing of research questions using the PICOT format in randomized controlled trials of venous ulcer disease is suboptimal: A systematic survey.Improving the reporting and usability of research studiesDoes the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an updateAssessment of Adherence of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Published in Radiology Journals to STARD Statement Indexed in Web of Science, PubMed & Scopus in 2015
P2860
Q24197568-B8D81052-3EC8-4111-A568-1FB94A9574E8Q27025258-DF3B1E50-3CFD-4C2B-AE0C-ADF843CEE17CQ33919787-F5324A76-18F2-46F4-AD57-CCA83572D534Q35076003-23479B5B-90AB-41EB-8353-A7D2EA71E859Q36831373-8DE8459D-64BD-493A-9DB3-FD2574498FFEQ37454704-D2927D9B-40CC-4CCE-A11B-93AF73384464Q37820698-F7D9CDD6-114A-4949-9C2F-3211C93AD0C4Q38097128-43EEF2E2-C09A-4F90-9ECF-B78BE48E8974Q38181463-42F24A9F-E63F-4EE0-A8D9-504ADDF36ECAQ38208198-ECAD6640-512F-40E4-928B-A162032494E5Q39045824-A1C1AEA1-9BA7-4AAA-8FFE-54EF72E7B13CQ47236893-ED48B632-E35A-4A85-8091-2313F6460165Q56880253-4202DC56-9E31-412C-A8DD-25818A5E29A8Q57491117-1EFC7C4C-0F33-4F27-BA31-110EDACFB699Q57494566-5F271EA5-9CBA-44AC-BA12-9E51EABA61FE
P2860
Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 05 February 2010
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Quality reporting of endoscopi ...... STARD and CONSORT statements?
@en
Quality reporting of endoscopi ...... STARD and CONSORT statements?
@nl
type
label
Quality reporting of endoscopi ...... STARD and CONSORT statements?
@en
Quality reporting of endoscopi ...... STARD and CONSORT statements?
@nl
prefLabel
Quality reporting of endoscopi ...... STARD and CONSORT statements?
@en
Quality reporting of endoscopi ...... STARD and CONSORT statements?
@nl
P356
P1433
P1476
Quality reporting of endoscopi ...... STARD and CONSORT statements?
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1055/S-0029-1243846
P577
2010-02-05T00:00:00Z