Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
about
Tracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluationBarriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews.Good Science, Good Sense and Good Sensibilities: The Three Ss of Carol NewtonFurther peer review failures.Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delayCommon misconceptions in molecular ecology: echoes of the modern synthesis.Reliability of reviewer ratings in the manuscript peer review process: an opportunity for improvement.Commentary: peer review and incomplete reference lists.Analysis of three factors possibly influencing the outcome of a science review process.Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal.Review time in peer review: quantitative analysis and modelling of editorial workflows.On the Nature and Role of Peer Review in Mathematics.Referees often miss obvious errors in computer and electronic publications.
P2860
Q24273360-7BD21508-A515-49D2-A987-5A5BC02A729AQ24288882-68E10C8A-9B00-4A55-8E64-665A296F71DDQ28591928-D1AD849F-4EF7-485B-B433-653900B2599BQ35232458-4E3F0B14-BF4B-4F89-98D1-E3B17F1AB085Q36147657-E721E695-E865-4460-8771-D1DC6CB6073BQ38009053-D8F83094-844D-48F6-AA91-59246521666DQ38117386-42E2CDD1-CD95-45C3-BCE7-EDFF83B5B5E6Q38162488-ED11BB2E-D348-4D24-962D-4AE73453FA2CQ38178319-736562E4-4E99-4551-849D-FD2D95FF3D24Q38263373-668DE6A5-4387-4D35-9EDA-BDC41EA546E7Q38807122-F56E109A-7F23-49EA-BCD7-64CB873C3EF8Q39061153-C5B3B579-8639-4830-832C-B7287DF018DBQ50854385-B76FE190-C9BA-492C-BB96-7CDEC9A7F966
P2860
Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on May 2010
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
@en
Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
@nl
type
label
Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
@en
Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
@nl
prefLabel
Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
@en
Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
@nl
P2860
P1476
Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
@en
P2093
Douglas P Newton
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/08989621003791945
P577
2010-05-01T00:00:00Z