Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision.
about
Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used?Validation of maternal cardiac output assessed by transthoracic echocardiography against pulmonary artery catheterization in severely ill pregnant women: prospective comparative study and systematic reviewBiological variation of the cardiac index in patients with stable chronic heart failure: inert gas rebreathing compared with impedance cardiography.Pulse contour analysis: is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?Neonatal hemodynamics: monitoring, data acquisition and analysis.Impedance cardiography (electrical velocimetry) and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in pediatric intensive care patients: a prospective single-center observational studyDynamic arterial elastance as a predictor of arterial pressure response to fluid administration: a validation studyCardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally invasive techniques.Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey?Reliability of a new 4th generation FloTrac algorithm to track cardiac output changes in patients receiving phenylephrine.Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Correlation of cardiac output measured by non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) and thermodilution in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.Evaluation of New Calibrated Pulse-Wave Analysis (VolumeViewTM/EV1000TM) for Cardiac Output Monitoring Undergoing Living Donor Liver TransplantationValidation of stroke volume and cardiac output by electrical interrogation of the brachial artery in normals: assessment of strengths, limitations, and sources of error.Pilot Study: Estimation of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output from Pulse Wave Velocity.The value of arterial pressure waveform cardiac output measurements in the radial and femoral artery in major cardiac surgery patients.Estimation of cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance using a multivariate regression model with features selected from the finger photoplethysmogram and routine cardiovascular measurements.Evaluation of cardiac output by 5 arterial pulse contour techniques using trend interchangeability methodComparison Between the Effects of Ringer`s Lactate and Hydroxyethyl Starch on Hemodynamic Parameters After Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Goal-directed fluid restriction during brain surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring.A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM).Predicting fluid responsiveness with transthoracic echocardiography is not yet evidence based.Pulmonary carbon dioxide elimination for cardiac output monitoring in peri-operative and critical care patients: history and current status.Therapeutic strategies for high-dose vasopressor-dependent shock.Non-invasive assessment of gestational hemodynamics: benefits and limitations of impedance cardiography versus other techniques.Semi-invasive measurement of cardiac output based on pulse contour: a review and analysis.Central venous pressure and peripheral venous pressure, however correlated are still both in the gray-area.A comparison of volume clamp method-based continuous noninvasive cardiac output (CNCO) measurement versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients.Haemodynamic monitoring in the peri-operative period: the past, the present and the future.Improved pressure contour analysis for estimating cardiac stroke volume using pulse wave velocity measurement.Thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus suprasternal Doppler in emergency care.Impact of hemodynamic goal-directed resuscitation on mortality in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Evaluation of the estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring system in adults and children undergoing kidney transplant surgery: a pilot study.Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?Continuous noninvasive cardiac output determination using the CNAP system: evaluation of a cardiac output algorithm for the analysis of volume clamp method-derived pulse contour.Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of method.Accuracy of Cardiac Output by Nine Different Pulse Contour Algorithms in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Comparison with Transpulmonary ThermodilutionComparison of monitoring performance of bioreactance versus esophageal Doppler in pediatric patients.
P2860
Q27001703-F5393ABD-58BE-424F-A2FC-E2C557BF6BB8Q28069505-65732C6C-DE04-44C7-8255-47EB88AD7C8AQ30372999-52C0E8C3-BE35-41D8-BAAC-F72673FAF1A8Q30471363-93272189-84AE-47DD-B762-D355064EB62BQ30575625-8427FC19-462E-4800-98C1-47E035045A29Q34668598-FDE7CC2B-905C-45AA-9DEA-1E04DAC8D187Q34740316-F16E2B71-2443-4ED0-9FCD-782DB7287953Q35109966-61FC5ADF-825A-44DC-A045-6F28B22A0856Q35213540-5FF7665C-9A8B-47A5-B864-C4DA1F77D2C6Q35231691-AADE75F5-3D22-4FE9-B8F1-21F5C2BE9B87Q35599577-408D92F8-CBA2-49B4-A484-C2921AE1741EQ35758071-0FF25F9F-78E5-45C2-BED8-14A9FAB15070Q35808012-FA683ABF-787B-4335-BCD8-65CA06A5A9F3Q36162639-A7F7E42D-AC8F-4079-991A-78E7236D895DQ36210239-E1284B1D-D3A9-4EA2-A227-CD5AF61FCA87Q36242956-2B2D15E3-E240-495F-8389-C64FCC0C8F01Q36306617-C0C7A8D8-2C04-4403-8180-542F7BDEA804Q36831451-0E90F935-EEA9-4CF4-9456-430A16E5CE96Q37205052-426CA81A-3A0E-4C46-B5DD-37F3EB71DA81Q37289930-F2DBC565-B44F-4E48-874C-2D87746CFC15Q37647586-634D1B31-F592-44D7-BB92-57F6FCC3C9C3Q38018511-D085F492-1A58-44CF-AAD7-45F37C2C256CQ38038668-0DCB0335-5771-4898-A564-24410378FE34Q38068525-BFC7B605-C544-4464-B9AC-655C8F66E440Q38115400-8D2638BB-C637-4EAF-99EC-D2A3ED259BA9Q38154892-D63D173F-6C5F-4E58-A533-79BD7F725CA2Q38160245-ED1BD424-324F-45D7-B085-0720397ABDC2Q38197095-972CAA59-C767-43B2-9677-24F9068D6628Q38560999-6421F3B1-07D5-4390-8176-30BED5EBFE6AQ38765946-C99729F2-BD46-43FE-AF6A-BDBE75AB283DQ38775399-2FFC1A72-E959-41D2-97C7-E96F761FEEE1Q38822424-2C61A542-4CDE-4B40-A9DC-2A1B9E55673CQ38893212-B65F9580-0A77-4804-9EFE-222EE16433FAQ39358854-27939FB4-255A-40DF-8301-D1EE2A876CBFQ39363861-78E7CA3A-7238-47AA-BC42-59C71C2D10A0Q40598818-658E7B01-DE07-4B86-B506-0B6E97D910F7Q40676983-BAD549E7-4FD6-4659-88FB-D9B1459FDC6FQ40886888-69A2F325-1298-4BDF-88A9-24C39DD683B7Q41190445-6E9525CB-00FC-4D5C-B2E2-3D9B3B29FDD7Q41521696-A1DB0A7C-D250-404F-BEA7-14AE4F94C8DA
P2860
Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Minimally invasive measurement ...... sis of accuracy and precision.
@en
Minimally invasive measurement ...... sis of accuracy and precision.
@nl
type
label
Minimally invasive measurement ...... sis of accuracy and precision.
@en
Minimally invasive measurement ...... sis of accuracy and precision.
@nl
prefLabel
Minimally invasive measurement ...... sis of accuracy and precision.
@en
Minimally invasive measurement ...... sis of accuracy and precision.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Minimally invasive measurement ...... sis of accuracy and precision.
@en
P2093
Philip J Peyton
Simon W Chong
P304
P356
10.1097/ALN.0B013E3181EE3130
P407
P577
2010-11-01T00:00:00Z