A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37877171

about

Prevalence of Anxiety Disorders among Children and Adolescents in Iran: A Systematic Review Self-Reported Facial Pain in UK Biobank Study: Prevalence and Associated Factors Has the prevalence of stunting in South African children changed in 40 years? A systematic review.An introduction to systematic reviews in animal health, animal welfare, and food safety.Systematic review of the prevalence of mental illness stigma within the Greek culture.Prevalence of Conduct Disorder in the Middle East: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol.Perspective: Essential Study Quality Descriptors for Data from Nutritional Epidemiologic Research.

P2860

Q28080647-83907026-F885-41BC-B16C-2442EE3BB490 Q34450990-5D206D39-42CF-474E-8228-4B026BB8BE90 Q35686373-F2E65EBC-6B43-4A08-8242-68A46E64632A Q38326009-8E67B502-672D-47EE-AF8B-BAA37DB46719 Q38738332-1BF11F92-0DBA-46CE-BECA-A3EF2E896BC7 Q38785920-3583AA9F-F1EF-45CC-8188-F77DADE5E164 Q47685358-899EC9AC-F5DD-4773-86BF-1CB7539D6500

P2860

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37877171

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@pt

bilimsel makale

@tr

scientific article published on 19 May 2011

@en

vedecký článok

@sk

vetenskaplig artikel

@sv

videnskabelig artikel

@da

vědecký článek

@cs

name

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

@en

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

@nl

type

label

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

@en

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

@nl

prefLabel

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

@en

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

@nl

P1433

Q37877171-791FBEEF-DA3B-48AB-8A67-91DD1F313DF9

P1476

Q37877171-AFDC6E5D-ED83-4EB2-AFFA-6E38EBD691FC

P2093

Q37877171-1E54C264-4C33-42EF-BCC2-5348561D6C4C

Q37877171-57E0EF29-E916-4859-A1F0-112227C00C41

Q37877171-707DF30D-AAC1-4B09-90CC-DE55BE363830

P2860

Q37877171-048B58CC-5D92-4050-BF10-D84B97E21282

Q37877171-06BB203B-9912-42BE-B967-0053F29C9BD9

Q37877171-0BCAB0C5-7C1B-4AF3-B202-31690FEE68DF

Q37877171-10B30FF4-7BB3-450B-9125-4A1430802DA1

Q37877171-13E488C4-63D3-4583-853A-712FDB20C7FA

Q37877171-14D84DC3-9A54-4677-9FAF-D4A5907A2585

Q37877171-27D75E8F-0CBC-4C1E-8C19-1E3437202948

Q37877171-2E8DBD3C-3C7B-4F3C-912D-3168B191644F

Q37877171-32ABBA27-3925-43F3-8817-3E36C1F48E80

Q37877171-356A3EC4-3174-4DE8-8D68-F3B1C5DE0007

P304

Q37877171-7252D117-20CE-448F-BE40-D7A0D2652F95

P31

Q37877171-7A0C869A-7562-434B-815E-7A7B419920F1

P356

Q37877171-7AEEF452-C336-430B-BF2E-072FBFD19587

P433

Q37877171-9684481E-E5D2-4119-AC0D-C1CC25FEBD87

P478

Q37877171-63C779DE-2E7D-4C9C-A8B5-CF52A714E92D

P50

Q37877171-4AA44B44-DCF4-4F56-AE9C-C17886305F05

P577

Q37877171-D5B98F53-86AD-4B4B-90F4-7E57ED351454

P5875

Q37877171-4B16808B-66EB-4267-8593-CA02C62555F5

P698

Q37877171-8030274E-1820-459D-BD63-3D1056A7F9CC

P356

S00784-011-0557-4

P1433

Clinical Oral Investigations

P1476

A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence

@en

P2093

Lydia Eberhard

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Marc Schmitter

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Peter Rammelsberg

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies

The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions

Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research.

A systematic review of the relationship between overjet size and traumatic dental injuries.

Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.

P304

781-788

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00784-011-0557-4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

16

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos

P577

2011-05-19T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

51148611

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21594656

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string