Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture.

Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37906843

about

Laparoscopic isthmocele treatment - single center experience.Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: Safety and Quality The never ending debate single-layer versus double-layer closure of the uterine incision at cesarean section.The Misgav-Ladach method of cesarean section: a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics.Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature Uterine closure in cesarean delivery: a new technique The optimal uterine closure technique during cesarean Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.Laparoscopic correction of the uterine muscle loss in the scar after a Caesarean section delivery What are the best surgical techniques for caesarean sections? A contemporary review.Risk of cesarean scar defect in single- versus double-layer uterine closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure.Case Series: Spontaneous Rupture of Uterus in Early Pregnancy.The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study.Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery.Operative technique at caesarean delivery and risk of complete uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labour at term. A registry case-control study.Barbed sutures versus conventional sutures for uterine closure at cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial.Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure.

P2860

Q33581457-3BFC0050-6223-485F-B052-216BC86ABF6D Q33661788-8553DD0C-2142-42B6-A155-7B5C44293F62 Q33722550-6FB43384-0CC8-4C6F-87AA-580B0258DA4B Q34021292-79C46BC4-D2F8-4AAF-B4AA-4DE38DFCE913 Q34285418-7C1F6290-115A-44A2-94BD-DF768CE3B711 Q35877431-D9CBF4D5-DC9C-4366-9BBD-5BA97E44C5E0 Q36172613-303A65A2-348A-44FF-91F8-7CE2B421F360 Q36172618-B82ADC2B-D152-4DF7-837A-04149AF5111E Q36276332-687EEBDC-2214-4B92-A67B-F6549E0792EF Q37060353-5179B757-EEB8-45AD-B87F-D096D4F4CB57 Q37537190-D64525AD-201C-4363-BDBA-14F2F4F25FF3 Q38601518-8EF7FC0E-B0AF-4487-9187-E3BD12B4387A Q39077839-1439DE8B-E1E5-46FA-8961-ED54D7B22C76 Q40191616-B8072EBA-FB99-46A4-9B8C-F3CA3BF5DC68 Q40586108-1018BA1C-E801-453E-9855-955CF4A1F135 Q41579456-B3C83E09-E187-46EC-9C13-3A1ED1DF4F28 Q42203310-52E57B4E-59D7-45FC-AC1B-12E63CE622BF Q44740438-F8419992-1F32-4026-9A15-A8E23B591B78 Q44766709-5682F526-FD13-4EB3-9877-CC8B379BB274 Q46581258-F11231CF-763C-4418-A682-6735563D0D14 Q48362615-C6653FA3-FAD4-4709-B844-568EFC480CBC

P2860

Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37906843

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articol științific

@ro

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@gl

artigo científico

@pt

artigo científico

@pt-br

artikel ilmiah

@id

artikull shkencor

@sq

artículo científico

@es

name

Single- versus double-layer cl ...... y and risk of uterine rupture.

@en

Single- versus double-layer cl ...... y and risk of uterine rupture.

@nl

type

label

Single- versus double-layer cl ...... y and risk of uterine rupture.

@en

Single- versus double-layer cl ...... y and risk of uterine rupture.

@nl

prefLabel

Single- versus double-layer cl ...... y and risk of uterine rupture.

@en

Single- versus double-layer cl ...... y and risk of uterine rupture.

@nl

P1433

Q37906843-0812E16E-0053-4443-80E9-84B92858A647

P1476

Q37906843-FAEF074B-D863-43DD-BCE3-CC0BEB578EE0

P2093

Q37906843-0C5964C2-51C1-4664-A518-2CC2DDDE250A

Q37906843-0E1CDA95-A1D4-4B29-84BC-DCD94EF18850

Q37906843-1C4A5FB9-4BCF-4FDD-9202-8D3FE10BD1A3

Q37906843-1E744D83-4737-4883-AEE7-65A8F3828E2B

Q37906843-382A79B3-57EA-4B0C-8D89-0596C5D32780

Q37906843-40CB6BAF-FE8F-46ED-A2FC-E184429DF7E7

Q37906843-504411A1-D988-4CBC-97A4-1BEE79514E88

Q37906843-920D26B1-E536-4C94-8EEE-5F00B92D5221

Q37906843-9FA0F6A8-70B9-4B6D-B3B4-090205DB1565

Q37906843-A6C04321-4A1A-4515-977B-22EE52D42B31

P2860

Q37906843-0386DDBA-62CC-4669-96B2-DB3C6CB5E7FC

Q37906843-1A0F6F5A-4A23-4855-8F81-AEAD4771D387

Q37906843-1EA8453E-199F-49C2-8206-B4C405934EC0

Q37906843-2A822C2B-93C2-4B7B-B939-F481ADE64FF8

Q37906843-2C75372A-35FB-4634-A3D7-2633E153E73A

Q37906843-32C7A1C6-655D-49C2-AD30-E7B5AB45E270

Q37906843-464865BB-F792-41BA-BC63-31DA7C0B5E24

Q37906843-5A111C02-86C7-4215-B5B4-E70A99E90625

Q37906843-66C78E58-C0B9-492C-B3EA-C00000365C52

Q37906843-69C781B7-65CD-41A2-9729-B044066B3F45

P304

Q37906843-6A7E0946-4569-4425-BC7F-D3D186E31E01

P31

Q37906843-6E252B46-0CD4-47C4-AC91-42B2C591DA86

Q37906843-9bc20f31-0788-4dc9-aaaf-d6bb30be1101

P356

Q37906843-C804FE5C-5858-411F-B6BA-9470E1A9B7A4

P433

Q37906843-E64412E8-4CCE-4D6F-8E19-A0799B0194A7

P478

Q37906843-01F72FCF-D0F8-40B0-BF94-1A3ABAD42519

P577

Q37906843-0C5624DC-BD91-417F-85C5-EC0D83D46BED

P5875

Q37906843-DEE647A8-4437-4479-988F-5AF05D78B5E5

P698

Q37906843-34DB570E-C27E-406E-A10B-E997A97DB9E9

P921

Q37906843-9CC2C6F1-586D-47D5-90F3-435A3DE17EAD

P356

J.IJGO.2011.04.013

P1433

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

P1476

Single- versus double-layer cl ...... y and risk of uterine rupture.

@en

P2093

Amélie Boutin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Charlotte H E Weimar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Emmanuel Bujold

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Igor Hudic

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lynne Moore

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nicole Jastrow

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nils Chaillet

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Normand Brassard

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Robert J Gauthier

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Stéphanie Roberge

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting

The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description.

Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis.

Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section.

Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors?

Evidence-based vaginal birth after Caesarean section.

Meta-analysis: principles and procedures.

P304

5-10

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1016/J.IJGO.2011.04.013

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

115

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2011-07-26T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

51526523

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21794864

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

cesarean section