Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures.
about
The Xanthomonas Ax21 protein is processed by the general secretory system and is secreted in association with outer membrane vesiclesCrop immunity against viruses: outcomes and future challengesElucidating the Role of Effectors in Plant-Fungal Interactions: Progress and ChallengesMaking sense of hormone-mediated defense networking: from rice to ArabidopsisInterconnection between flowering time control and activation of systemic acquired resistanceExaptive origins of regulated mRNA decay in eukaryotesBehind the lines-actions of bacterial type III effector proteins in plant cellsTranscriptomics-based screen for genes induced by flagellin and repressed by pathogen effectors identifies a cell wall-associated kinase involved in plant immunity.Overexpression of Rice Auxilin-Like Protein, XB21, Induces Necrotic Lesions, up-Regulates Endocytosis-Related Genes, and Confers Enhanced Resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.An XA21-associated kinase (OsSERK2) regulates immunity mediated by the XA21 and XA3 immune receptors.Stomatal Closure and Rise in ROS/NO of Arabidopsis Guard Cells by Tobacco Microbial Elicitors: Cryptogein and Harpin.Tomato SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 contribute to disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea.Identification of post-translational modifications of plant protein complexesNew and old roles of plasmodesmata in immunity and parallels to tunneling nanotubesUbiquitination of pattern recognition receptors in plant innate immunityPlant immune responses against viruses: how does a virus cause disease?Large-scale transcriptome comparison reveals distinct gene activations in wheat responding to stripe rust and powdery mildew.Transcriptomic analysis reveals tomato genes whose expression is induced specifically during effector-triggered immunity and identifies the Epk1 protein kinase which is required for the host response to three bacterial effector proteinsPlanting molecular functions in an ecological context with Arabidopsis thaliana.The Pseudomonas syringae effector HopF2 suppresses Arabidopsis immunity by targeting BAK1.Development of disease-resistant rice using regulatory components of induced disease resistance.A highly-conserved single-stranded DNA-binding protein in Xanthomonas functions as a harpin-like protein to trigger plant immunityOsSERK1 regulates rice development but not immunity to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae or Magnaporthe oryzae.Microbial signature-triggered plant defense responses and early signaling mechanismsSimultaneous transcriptome analysis of Sorghum and Bipolaris sorghicola by using RNA-seq in combination with de novo transcriptome assembly.Mobilization of lipids and fortification of cell wall and cuticle are important in host defense against Hessian fly.Dual regulation of gene expression mediated by extended MAPK activation and salicylic acid contributes to robust innate immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana.A change in temperature modulates defence to yellow (stripe) rust in wheat line UC1041 independently of resistance gene Yr36.The E3 ligase OsPUB15 interacts with the receptor-like kinase PID2 and regulates plant cell death and innate immunitySecreted fungal effector lipase releases free fatty acids to inhibit innate immunity-related callose formation during wheat head infection.Cerato-platanin induces resistance in Arabidopsis leaves through stomatal perception, overexpression of salicylic acid- and ethylene-signalling genes and camalexin biosynthesis.Transgenic expression of the dicotyledonous pattern recognition receptor EFR in rice leads to ligand-dependent activation of defense responsesIncreased resistance to biotrophic pathogens in the Arabidopsis constitutive induced resistance 1 mutant is EDS1 and PAD4-dependent and modulated by environmental temperature.Signal regulators of systemic acquired resistanceRetromer contributes to immunity-associated cell death in Arabidopsis.Optimal level of purple acid phosphatase5 is required for maintaining complete resistance to Pseudomonas syringae.The Arabidopsis Pep-PEPR system is induced by herbivore feeding and contributes to JA-mediated plant defence against herbivory.Analysis of Globodera rostochiensis effectors reveals conserved functions of SPRYSEC proteins in suppressing and eliciting plant immune responses.A novel method of transcriptome interpretation reveals a quantitative suppressive effect on tomato immune signaling by two domains in a single pathogen effector protein.Arabidopsis AtERF15 positively regulates immunity against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and Botrytis cinerea.
P2860
Q21128735-97489B75-6F03-4A53-A072-9D5811A304F9Q21129198-171B4950-7E49-4C70-9D76-BC3CDDD290FCQ26747445-227977DD-367E-42F5-8E00-68AA897E750DQ26849311-34E49227-19BA-4C5A-9BB5-E1CBBC9B242BQ26864563-54A6D971-2A7A-4292-86E1-EAF5652C3D26Q27468936-AC63721B-12FC-488C-96DD-055F1F32FBD8Q28068755-B2068010-A857-4B99-BF4D-6CE9ACF122C3Q33741744-F7D73B13-6F03-4DBE-B016-2EEF0D8BAF47Q33758686-147198C9-6828-472E-B1C3-51B6A2F340CCQ33780047-627C19CD-09B2-4E04-8688-FF380B572572Q33819325-97F9D9F4-BF18-4E19-B4CA-3AA6C07850D8Q33891597-3EC8D619-68FC-45A0-AD41-ACC0E2A08C78Q34034820-8E013A64-8975-45E8-8FC0-74D774DA863EQ34099902-CB2947F3-94B0-4DD8-B9C4-F8E4AB78B4C5Q34284293-AF6C02C2-4333-4070-ABFA-D86A282F9011Q34346888-D27F9562-D353-4190-928E-6C6BC2B3D6EBQ34363060-CDF09B49-5BF0-4026-8F13-385886D2FE0DQ34466870-70A5B89A-1FDB-48B5-B78E-A08CD8F74DF6Q34468548-37985098-C113-4089-9339-37A266F9D79FQ34470926-5D069C89-5238-4264-A77D-F600B4E31606Q34501516-3F53F267-307E-4509-A5D2-B8B84B82949AQ34589927-6CABB5C0-1870-412B-B498-F6DF50898101Q34617237-123911F1-4351-43D3-9C35-74254288A2B4Q34624932-88587940-BBB4-412A-B584-7C1DA236D89FQ34701539-02AA11B7-F8F6-432B-AE6C-1AA9EDC11D4DQ34783163-148659A1-59BE-44DA-BA7C-20AABF6EA093Q35069218-93FC02A2-BF6C-46D6-ABF5-16AF845FCED9Q35084408-E128FF40-1D34-46C6-868D-3695E18DAFA9Q35090419-6C6FCD1D-DDAB-41C9-9E71-2E2A12C9C557Q35135913-AAF41C98-38DF-43D3-8C57-AC5EF3DF3454Q35195702-D01517B9-C006-41EB-BFE1-3DCD06D9009BQ35231544-BAF0ACE4-941F-47C8-B800-6299A87AEF1DQ35321385-ED051AAF-DBD0-425C-9C16-8D3B8C240B96Q35383442-CE3ED9B3-98B0-427B-8D23-21A7D50173FCQ35561335-68331E62-F39A-43E7-AC80-DD28CE5AD8A6Q35912939-6FE58618-DC37-46AF-A8D0-11C183DB4BCEQ35922276-7F1F6B42-9279-4A61-A365-55658EC2FEBCQ35939412-E8778E8E-60F4-4FFA-90A8-DA061C73DE66Q35956797-7ECF4B46-BB42-4EA7-8BED-DC4C535062FFQ36026086-C25CE2B8-F391-4F3E-A36C-9038388D5463
P2860
Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures.
@en
Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures.
@nl
type
label
Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures.
@en
Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures.
@nl
prefLabel
Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures.
@en
Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures.
@nl
P1476
Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures.
@en
P2093
Pamela C Ronald
P304
P356
10.1146/ANNUREV-ARPLANT-042811-105518
P577
2012-02-09T00:00:00Z