Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.
about
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adultsThe role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancerImpact of novel techniques on minimally invasive adrenal surgery: trends and outcomes from a contemporary international large series in urology.Portable robot for autonomous venipuncture using 3D near infrared image guidanceRobotic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors: Current status.Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder formation: on the way to a standardized procedureRobot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion - safe and reproducible?Comparison of open and robotic-assisted prostatectomy: The University of British Columbia experience.Advances in minimally invasive repair of vesicovaginal fistulas.Partial nephrectomy--contemporary indications, techniques and outcomes.Robotic and standard open radical prostatectomy: oncological and quality-of-life outcomes.Robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The use of robotics in surgery: a review.Initial Canadian experience with robotic simple prostatectomy: Case series and literature review.Effectiveness and feasibility of robotic gastric neurostimulator placement in patients with refractory gastroparesis.Standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating room environment can reduce the operative time during robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders.Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device.Independent predictors of prolonged operative time during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.A low-cost, high-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging-compatible actuator.Analysis of Charges Associated with Definitive Nonsurgical Therapy for Early-Stage Lateralized Tonsil Cancer.Trends in immediate perioperative morbidity and delay in discharge after open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP): a 20-year institutional experience.Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection.[Treatment of invasive bladder cancer: robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion].Robotic removal of eroded vaginal mesh into the bladder.Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share?Switching from laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparing oncological outcomes and complications.Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after more than 5 years.A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons.Financial Impact of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Costs Between the Robotic and Open Technique in a Single Institution.Robotic Versus Open Renal Transplantation in Obese Patients: Protocol for a Cost-Benefit Markov Model Analysis.
P2860
Q24186826-BF2C5FDC-FC52-4BF4-AABC-90E549944205Q26852257-E529A6CD-1FC5-4E4F-A6AB-DAC3FF2D50A6Q30315523-0027F439-FD3C-4934-94BB-A07B347DFC39Q30408501-2319A339-1D0F-48E1-B7D8-383DBD6EE33DQ33995420-C28A2D88-60A9-4197-9B80-7ACFABB90D23Q35078670-ED464B41-7B05-475B-A9A5-22A7D67299D9Q35533840-8BD19F23-43E9-4CCA-AA62-8B793CB0CF14Q37726873-97A64617-BDDC-4B19-A567-E27546CBE70CQ38087936-6ADF56E3-B8AE-412E-B654-26EAA0BCFDB9Q38099201-B41CCB75-6401-40E3-B2A1-0778340096D3Q38162888-4AF4096F-8974-4EDF-8C24-56732A844BAAQ38248957-72679D9A-3A2E-4406-A812-79C8F9F6EA39Q38256795-55760419-194C-430D-99AF-3CC5BDACD3EBQ38596444-6D296AB0-7037-463D-A897-73C221188539Q39152502-E04C9916-E9EE-4189-B741-433AEFFB08BDQ39381210-4CF8A6C2-69DA-4B98-8EA1-99497C72DDE7Q39899620-42CFE00F-558C-4F35-B1CD-394DC6A8B45BQ40359594-F9FACB4F-0F82-4493-B955-A70F23BC1F79Q41125232-0A841BAD-2FD9-493E-94BD-FEB54EA66BB4Q41675927-3A0ADC2F-FFEE-44AB-8F91-EB681FA0AB0CQ42603171-8573E83A-E75B-4E07-BC2F-6B6C688F9D4CQ44361555-F39BBD87-1CA1-41CE-B331-3CE11256D4C0Q44687557-61A504AC-D748-4E37-8E30-24D3B32EAA21Q45704857-E70CB26B-6A19-4175-80F0-C4FFC5C1D90BQ48657489-FFDB37C9-626C-4D98-884F-981DC7B2F979Q50046161-C0ED82B7-AB39-4439-95B2-6262BAAAE0DCQ51192093-485540CA-13ED-4414-86C2-018A18C615E7Q51273356-E3F37040-A127-41A8-A51A-362B1D8A99FCQ54878365-5FC5890E-2438-4530-B4B2-D100F26B19A3Q55123478-4F77B4B0-233E-4FEF-A2BB-56C19A19C787
P2860
Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.
@en
Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.
@nl
type
label
Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.
@en
Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.
@en
Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review
@en
P2093
Amel Ibrahim
Kamran Ahmed
Muhammed Shamim Khan
Nuzhath Khan
Tim T Wang
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1464-410X.2012.11015.X
P577
2012-03-22T00:00:00Z