Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.
about
Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A ReviewNerve-sparing techniques and results in robot-assisted radical prostatectomyLong-term continence outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomesPredictive factors for lymph node positivity in patients undergoing extended pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot assisted radical prostatectomy.Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.Symptomatic and quality-of-life outcomes after treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer: a systematic review.Overall rate, location, and predictive factors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.Oncological results at 2 years after robotic radical prostatectomy - the Romanian experience.Urinary Continence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Impact of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion.Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Another Canadian experience.Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches?Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: what the evidence really says.Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.Systematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.Model of a training program in robotic surgery and its initial results.Urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy - anatomical/reconstructive and nerve-sparing techniques to improve outcomes.Robot-assisted partial prostatectomy for anterior prostate cancer: a step-by-step guide.Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and frozen-section analysis efficiently predict upgrading, upstaging, and extraprostatic extension in patients undergoing nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.Non-surgically related causes of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigmThe effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Perioperative and continence outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy in elderly Indian men (≥70 years): A sub-group analysis.Anastomotic complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.Is previous experience in laparoscopic necessary to perform robotic radical prostatectomy? A comparative study with robotic and the classic open procedure in patients with prostate cancer.Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Towards development and validation of an intraoperative assessment tool for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy training: results of a Delphi study.A Retrospective Study of Erectile Function and Use of Erectile Aids in Prostate Cancer Patients After Radical Prostatectomy in Denmark.Surgical Techniques for Managing Post-prostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction.The surgical approach can be determined from the pathological specimen obtained after open or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Previous Prostate Surgery.Quantification of median lobe protrusion and its impact on the base surgical margin status during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.Men's experiences of regaining urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for localised prostate cancer: a qualitative phenomenological study.Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Survival after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer: a population-based study.Long-term quality of life after radical prostatectomy: 8-year longitudinal study in Japan.Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.Current trends in patient enrollment for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in Belgium.Validation of an educational program balancing surgeon training and surgical quality control during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Current status of robotic surgery in urology.
P2860
Q26737724-25E0E8B3-85FB-4FE9-93E7-FDBFC46A92F4Q28072811-B843C018-DC9F-4257-B516-4C112AFF1B0FQ33773296-6D76D74D-43B6-4708-A320-854ADDFDBC42Q34375988-3E67E219-11DD-4A8C-BF4A-4A9F4BBB32F6Q35830328-17C5A5EA-FFE6-41AC-A969-558671F79943Q35941781-564A3717-B869-426D-AC04-3C2F8FDF5577Q35992097-86C1CFA3-8882-4EFE-B6C7-EC759FDEC9AFQ36530193-9C286B58-75E6-431A-B698-127A420BF872Q36840680-E800033D-56E0-434F-B365-621AFAA51D25Q37124785-1C998DEC-63D7-4BC8-A818-8490ED7A8D21Q37726876-869ED27D-48FF-46F7-AEA9-0D23E730C540Q38056144-B7B4328F-8672-4ACB-82F2-D9B817B56EDFQ38119268-E1DCB3E1-BBE0-43F6-BA9E-B97D2BA6F90FQ38165283-0FF7FFEE-6F35-4963-A80B-6F7B520D68CFQ38591401-9356CBE7-ED36-490A-A659-1E66BB57AD3BQ38646599-E8385757-EE71-4EAA-BBA5-7BA0C01F4265Q38893692-B99525E4-1F1E-413E-A936-D546770A0506Q39098450-3194AC71-A5C9-4540-B64A-B3C59242AE58Q39282130-2B973012-3758-4C47-AAF1-EEA2401772EDQ40013435-13E89A93-0166-49BB-99E2-26479C0B9FB6Q40561955-B258A380-CE95-4553-872B-CB70D43C8EE9Q40586715-E104D6FA-E026-460A-B3B9-AD1D45CC5717Q40745701-57330A1D-5840-48B2-8EE7-604C6549BE0AQ40861271-27E07C9D-DB84-457D-AB9B-3672AF336692Q41193234-7BF1A6FB-108E-41EA-839E-2072A1C28299Q41301922-77F56699-0F1E-45EF-93FC-DADC7BFC4E5CQ41412124-F5EF1A29-A23B-4721-851D-61C5B824C335Q41457324-695490A3-EA6D-4F24-81D0-B01FAF852509Q42368368-A55275E8-B55E-4BC4-9B6E-E8C3976188FEQ42601575-0613F6B5-4F52-41A3-B8C8-E5E3FC2AD9AAQ43163368-900E06DF-A567-4638-9D5D-E0A9099EBA34Q43410226-6797AB2E-B8C1-4065-B7A2-E6C047CB78D9Q44338203-B78FFAD0-3525-4058-A7D5-7968477B2B2DQ44595410-2112A241-5428-480A-ABF2-67A2E7BD52ABQ44847025-5198964D-8212-4A20-B62E-D19B69FAC2DCQ46132229-DB175E5E-4AD5-4A87-BC22-88500F882D18Q47135697-2C0B412E-9B20-4AB8-9DB6-FF989CF6044CQ48029204-3E863AA6-E018-4911-A409-23B59E788C09Q48527343-1707E548-430D-4AF3-9E02-B69B5399C9C3Q50109278-D0A4527C-D651-4313-9867-A0199E31627A
P2860
Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Best practices in robot-assist ...... the Pasadena Consensus Panel.
@en
type
label
Best practices in robot-assist ...... the Pasadena Consensus Panel.
@en
prefLabel
Best practices in robot-assist ...... the Pasadena Consensus Panel.
@en
P2093
P50
P1433
P1476
Best practices in robot-assist ...... f the Pasadena Consensus Panel
@en
P2093
Anthony Costello
Francesco Montorsi
Giacomo Novara
Hein Van Poppel
Henk Van der Poel
James A Eastham
Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Mani Menon
Pasadena Consensus Panel
Peter R Carroll
P304
P356
10.1016/J.EURURO.2012.05.057
P407
P577
2012-06-07T00:00:00Z