GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence.
about
Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)Methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents - assessment of harmful effects in non-randomised studiesVitamin D supplementation for prevention of cancer in adultsEffectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregiversShould the Cochrane Collaboration be Producing Reviews of Efficiency?The use of Bayesian networks to assess the quality of evidence from research synthesis: 1.Specialist palliative care services for adults with advanced, incurable illness in hospital, hospice, or community settings--protocol for a systematic reviewThe International College of Neuropsychopharmacology (CINP) Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder in Adults (CINP-BD-2017), Part 1: Background and Methods of the Development of GuidelinesHow to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3).How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3).Can pulses play a role in improving cardiometabolic health? Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysesGood intentions getting out of hand - is there a future for health care guidelines?Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Can aging in place be cost effective? A systematic reviewExercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with atrial fibrillation.Management of chronic neuropathic pain: a protocol for a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Astragalus in the prevention of upper respiratory tract infection in children with nephrotic syndrome: evidence-based clinical practiceA comparison of frameworks evaluating evidence for global health interventions.Evidence of and recommendations for non-pharmacological interventions for common geriatric conditions: the SENATOR-ONTOP systematic review protocol.Consensus development for healthcare professionals.SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs.Management of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: WHO guidelines for low tuberculosis burden countries.Fructose intake and risk of gout and hyperuricemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studiesAn interpretive review of consensus statements on clinical guideline development and their application in the field of traditional and complementary medicine.Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancerJapanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.The Evolution of the AASM Clinical Practice Guidelines: Another Step Forward.Mind the Gap! A Multilevel Analysis of Factors Related to Variation in Published Cost-Effectiveness Estimates within and between Countries.Issues in the incorporation of economic perspectives and evidence into Cochrane reviews.JSGE Clinical Practice Guidelines 2014: standards, methods, and process of developing the guidelines.Pain management in the neonatal piglet during routine management procedures. Part 2: grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015.The effects of sleep loss on young drivers' performance: A systematic review.Prevention and assessment of infectious diseases among children and adult migrants arriving to the European Union/European Economic Association: a protocol for a suite of systematic reviews for public health and health systems.GRADE EVIDENCE TO DECISION (EtD) FRAMEWORK FOR COVERAGE DECISIONS.The European Stroke Organisation Guidelines: a standard operating procedure.Practice Guidelines for Primary Care of Acute Abdomen 2015.The Practice Guidelines for Primary Care of Acute Abdomen 2015.Intensive follow-up for women with breast cancer: review of clinical, economic and patient's preference domains through evidence to decision framework.Differing Philosophical Approaches to Treating Patients.
P2860
Q22061981-0543C98C-011B-4869-9D88-8A29D285956FQ24186221-03028C46-4191-483F-B63B-D355027216F9Q24193850-4C536F1B-53F1-4E8A-AACF-6E1DF663E419Q24202142-D04AD7CA-877B-4BA4-8564-126651B56F8BQ24202817-2F3AAC05-6B33-4129-A5D2-BD04F2140327Q24288670-856DAA93-5754-4F90-B8BE-783BE42488D8Q26781045-749AEF35-63B9-49BF-B63D-12F265031859Q28076486-9426F3B5-5E9E-4F11-A811-C90D1419B99FQ30241967-BF92B01E-9E4B-4005-B54C-977BFD8175C7Q30244313-F383CA5F-3511-4CF5-9D76-B92A302A3290Q33628677-A41F78C9-3EEA-4AAE-9A72-E6D371B9B6D4Q33703947-E5204ED3-686D-43B8-942E-6E94F1627D1EQ33704584-D182F9D8-0826-4845-92AD-56D271D9B34FQ33945823-A4A2861F-191E-4958-8D68-BB9D734C2136Q34550885-DA686943-9CF3-49B8-B8A8-8E3E15EE631EQ34573490-856CA89A-AD54-4140-B1DC-447570CBCD88Q34714233-D1FCFEDB-7AE7-4300-BD59-ADF2744EE6DAQ34844852-9DFE5165-6B5F-4DA4-979F-2127E18A1261Q35047280-D0B4E696-5BBC-42E4-A537-A3B67B8361A7Q35514821-34187D93-5C9E-44BC-8B53-D2F2929FA067Q35734439-9B8831E1-03F3-454A-B961-E6933E08746FQ35787450-97524CCE-300C-4197-A0C0-EBCE9FE4EC71Q36152073-07C9370C-0018-43B1-BE24-0826F4B764AEQ36284474-57194F92-909A-4BA2-B02C-A45CA905BAFAQ36300533-6D92BAB4-B6E0-4DA3-B393-6CF0F3994D84Q36324953-64608F11-0A00-4EC9-A0BB-FA7A63CA9B7CQ36432729-6482A531-BE7A-4674-B1C5-458AB5FEFA4DQ36451242-D8E01468-BB3A-4B44-BDCF-FB42C836F3CBQ37361912-B42F86B5-805D-431C-84A7-B6BC68556ADCQ38275329-7423EB41-016B-44F3-830C-3BE340E48E12Q38326022-9BD3FBEF-73AB-4D93-9E6A-EDE0E1C44843Q38479517-5CF04F86-161A-498A-BD70-4B16F074A2D7Q38599727-30A9FE86-A9E0-4D6F-8635-30E6310917CEQ40046862-CA60E1F0-0914-45DA-9A5A-266816950BF7Q40143602-D4D7E4AB-8F27-40D7-B70E-7E1BC4FC6482Q40766391-9A5BC9C3-7DA6-4CE7-87FC-CE361DBC1223Q41030107-4F37E80D-735C-4947-8965-E2288174D414Q41041803-D514C943-42D0-4D34-A807-4135D8408B42Q42668855-05CDDE69-A545-4319-B298-3EE197B08F32Q44573625-D339D040-6E76-4636-9DE4-08C7277734A6
P2860
GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
GRADE guidelines: 10. Consider ...... quality of economic evidence.
@en
type
label
GRADE guidelines: 10. Consider ...... quality of economic evidence.
@en
prefLabel
GRADE guidelines: 10. Consider ...... quality of economic evidence.
@en
P2093
P50
P1476
GRADE guidelines: 10. Consider ...... quality of economic evidence.
@en
P2093
Francis Ruiz
Holger J Schünemann
Ian Shemilt
Massimo Brunetti
Robin Harbour
Roman Jaeschke
Silvia Pregno
Suzanne Hill
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2012.04.012
P577
2012-08-03T00:00:00Z