Comparison of the 2007 and 2011 appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography in various clinical settings.
about
Novel wireless devices for cardiac monitoringHospital variation in the use of noninvasive cardiac imaging and its association with downstream testing, interventions, and outcomesCan hospital rounds with pocket ultrasound by cardiologists reduce standard echocardiography?Limitations of free-form-text diagnostic requisitions as a tool for evaluating adherence to appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiographyAppropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography: Evolving Applications in the Era of Value-Based Healthcare.Assessment of inpatient multimodal cardiac imaging appropriateness at large academic medical centers.Appropriate use criteria: a review of need, development and applications.Educational intervention for improving the appropriateness of transthoracic echocardiograms ordered by pediatric cardiologists.An assessment of the clinical utility of echocardiography criteria in a Tertiary Health Center.Development and validation of a screening tool for the identification of inappropriate transthoracic echocardiograms.Appropriate use of echocardiography in an Australian regional centre.How I do it: judging appropriateness for TTE and TEE.Impact of a structured referral algorithm on the ability to monitor adherence to appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography.The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact.Appropriateness of use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: are they relevant outside the USA?An Automated System for Categorizing Transthoracic Echocardiography Indications According to the Echocardiography Appropriate Use Criteria.
P2860
Q26828642-142E71C9-ADE9-4499-9BE3-C6D93171ED46Q33764546-001424B2-D2DF-4426-9BDF-D122FDB02153Q33818744-10FB5188-095A-4A38-913A-92868ECA4C20Q35079151-23A68121-A952-4ACD-9303-58D35C049D0CQ37728715-0892F9DA-2CED-4686-BDB9-2FED00DA7435Q38634812-BE270B6A-3B1D-4BAF-AAAC-DF43624EA34CQ38665150-BFA287BB-28CF-4C8D-8C8A-2FE9CC6B2E49Q38948471-1A5D0D6C-D343-4DF5-90CD-1C2D94EA6528Q41447287-AAB8249B-E7E9-4E55-9B70-39733D8E2731Q41525627-57B028E2-BCA2-4C1B-A525-9D10EA9E3352Q41699871-B9706440-BE75-427D-A74B-3EF11159D0E6Q42010719-574A3B49-4521-40B0-A3A6-4AD915303884Q42354109-FFB81EB8-3151-458A-A8C0-D3F1D16730C7Q43833693-3F834AED-5D61-4B3E-8561-7B1E4B07F2F5Q44211785-D5429345-73D2-47FD-B8A5-815F10D911FBQ55311027-A7AC98BA-F364-4E02-AAAF-64936BE77E53
P2860
Comparison of the 2007 and 2011 appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography in various clinical settings.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Comparison of the 2007 and 201 ...... in various clinical settings.
@en
type
label
Comparison of the 2007 and 201 ...... in various clinical settings.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of the 2007 and 201 ...... in various clinical settings.
@en
P2093
P1476
Comparison of the 2007 and 201 ...... in various clinical settings.
@en
P2093
Dana M Carne
R Sacha Bhatia
Rory B Weiner
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ECHO.2012.07.018
P577
2012-08-14T00:00:00Z