Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions.

Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38051080

about

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration of solid lesions over time: Experience from a new endoscopic ultrasound program at a Canadian community hospital.High-quality endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration tissue acquisition.Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a retrospective study.When Is Rapid On-Site Evaluation Cost-Effective for Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy?Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (ENES): a pilot study Rapid On-Site Evaluation Does Not Improve Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Adequacy in Pancreatic Masses: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology new guidelines have a greater ability of risk stratification for pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens.Rapid on-site evaluation of EUS-FNA by cytopathologist: an experience of a tertiary hospital.Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle tissue acquisition: where we stand in 2013?Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on the adequacy of endoscopic-ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.How good is fine needle aspiration? What results should you expect?Basic technique for solid lesions: Cytology, core, or both?Randomized Noninferiority Trial Comparing Diagnostic Yield of Cytopathologist-guided versus 7 passes for EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Masses.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy technical guidelines COST ANALYSIS OF INTRA PROCEDURAL RAPID ON SITE EVALUATION OF CYTOPATHOLOGY WITH ENDOBRONCHIAL ULTRASOUND.Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for solid pancreatic neoplasms.Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: an updated meta-analysis.Tissue adequacy for ancillary studies beyond frozen section: a potential method for improving diagnostic and therapeutic results.Improved laboratory resource utilization and patient care with the use of rapid on-site evaluation for endobronchial ultrasound fine-needle aspiration biopsy.Studies on the impact of onsite evaluation must account for the per-pass success rate.Advanced EUS Guided Tissue Acquisition Methods for Pancreatic Cancer.Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer.Mathematical modelling can predict adequacy rates and needle passes for fine needle aspiration cytology with rapid on-site evaluation.Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis.Telecytology for Rapid On-Site Evaluation: Current Status.Endosonographer's macroscopic evaluation of EUS-FNAB specimens after interactive cytopathologic training: a single-center prospective validation cohort study."…That which we call a rose…": A critical analysis of rapid on-site evaluation.

P2860

Q33846919-E84E0B7F-749B-4901-8820-0E9DBE44C61F Q33970078-C111C84A-C74F-4B2F-B632-9A6B7635DE3C Q35201742-A2AB4B5B-7DDC-4A2C-A880-85346B486D4D Q35759074-B8ED0ADF-6F37-4D22-A40D-FBDA1E93C770 Q35899882-66055280-7DA6-4265-AC78-7D073EDD3E8D Q36140756-DDA68325-5B6C-4E65-9720-A45840E41629 Q37702678-B015E1A0-DB41-41CB-8236-14C9DC0CC14F Q38156121-87DEBFFC-0667-4AD0-B234-9DF7AA4AF8F7 Q38194127-117B0659-17CE-49F2-98A1-B0D96C65AB6E Q38208325-16171B54-5617-4BEE-AC3D-4DA420FAC7E0 Q38221878-D354991B-F818-4781-B3B5-EF6324F2B138 Q38221882-3B0A8B9D-2312-4303-B3DF-B9A21841F207 Q38676436-16AD842E-EC2B-475B-A59F-81BBDD85879D Q39172791-FA7D5F06-1B87-4DCD-9F46-FCB37E2BADB8 Q40122644-1F4C5B2F-41A5-4C99-9EE9-D7333A8561A0 Q40544418-F143A156-9ECD-4909-97DD-0972A890AC6F Q42371642-85A4AE1B-5C44-44B1-99E2-DFA639A4577D Q43413897-B097363B-E005-4FB1-B219-5F7CACD47280 Q45792661-32F5B92F-636C-49EE-A2AF-655FDC273835 Q46799835-4902B243-1399-4349-9CD9-1F8652A716C7 Q49804354-3BE6E25F-8F4F-4B22-8091-3677FFE2F944 Q50958592-72C7487F-1FDE-41CC-959C-5B7C6D9AF54B Q51072442-6952070E-3250-4C47-9508-B13574E96223 Q51190962-0D07F118-648F-4CD7-B04C-6A36FA27F3D1 Q52652951-96CB7089-595B-4879-9F7E-25ED4C4EFC94 Q53217120-00A8DC11-190C-4344-90FC-2D41BC3739AE Q53673896-D748E731-9F07-41F8-A27A-FA771E72F662

P2860

Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38051080

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articol științific

@ro

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@gl

artigo científico

@pt

artigo científico

@pt-br

artikel ilmiah

@id

artikull shkencor

@sq

artículo científico

@es

name

Rapid on-site evaluation incre ...... equacy for pancreatic lesions.

@en

type

label

Rapid on-site evaluation incre ...... equacy for pancreatic lesions.

@en

prefLabel

Rapid on-site evaluation incre ...... equacy for pancreatic lesions.

@en

P1433

Q38051080-0A10334E-50B2-4E0D-BE6A-D08F15A4E974

P1476

Q38051080-E70695C4-5BC2-45F0-81A6-C23A126D8C96

P2093

Q38051080-18AD1BFF-22D3-44C9-B7CE-61D8AAD6EE69

Q38051080-1FD138E5-0C27-44C9-A850-2D3A53B559CC

Q38051080-26861FB6-B933-42CA-AF19-B51688AA2E73

Q38051080-39E8DEA0-89A0-4CD9-B8D7-913E93E6D3AA

Q38051080-645A6294-F9D8-485E-A685-057E531DB631

P2860

Q38051080-0DD1063A-952B-4F4F-96D8-9BF493410706

Q38051080-15B47BED-C552-4612-A8AD-6A8CB54DF3B2

Q38051080-176ADECD-03D7-4830-BEC8-F29B4B02C43E

Q38051080-35B3B392-8930-49FD-A6B1-428C9F1C8E99

Q38051080-56C27672-4B65-44AD-A052-66AD79EA02DF

Q38051080-5CF5C548-4C7B-4D9C-840A-EB8498683EFD

Q38051080-6D5EAA62-A2B8-4B2D-B258-381344557B6B

Q38051080-75B7C887-D288-415C-ADD8-EB3723741455

Q38051080-91723032-FD40-418E-8B31-A39C830A21F2

Q38051080-9EC2C8B0-DE09-4B21-AF5E-73DD10BE72EB

P2888

Q38051080-B068F485-D7B6-4EDB-8FB8-FADBB476617B

P304

Q38051080-E9F9C367-BDD5-47FD-B74C-B96F2EFA7A9F

P31

Q38051080-22e0dfea-887a-4ce2-9a96-72a9418d88ff

Q38051080-64CA40EA-9A4B-453F-9999-93CDC0F35C8D

P356

Q38051080-50D069F6-536D-41DF-ADA3-D19735B4F866

P433

Q38051080-DA136284-509C-4462-AF1E-A3DDE270E993

P478

Q38051080-272FCEA2-5E59-4F7F-A05D-F73B279A5A7D

P50

Q38051080-041BA546-DD25-4FB9-AB2C-410CB14C5DC4

P577

Q38051080-0AD13B05-BA7D-4AF3-8DB6-28DF9F27B9E1

P6179

Q38051080-20742199-3C8E-4DA8-8951-38FA16B6C41B

P698

Q38051080-EDA78B73-5730-4318-A993-3A06D4D77FCD

P356

S10620-012-2411-1

P1433

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

P1476

Rapid on-site evaluation incre ...... equacy for pancreatic lesions.

@en

P2093

Anna P Matynia

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Benjamin L Witt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Gonzalo Barraza

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lester J Layfield

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Robert L Schmidt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: a single center experience in Korea.

Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses.

Influence of EUS training and pathology interpretation on accuracy of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic carcinoma: a 3-year experience and review of the literature.

Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy?

The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses.

A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles

Prospective pilot evaluation of a new needle prototype for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration: comparison of cytology and histology yield.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses in a veteran population: comparison of results with 22- and 25-gauge needles.

P2888

s10620-012-2411-1

P304

872-882

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S10620-012-2411-1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

58

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Douglas G. Adler

P577

2012-10-04T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1028945941

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

23053888

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string