Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews.

about

Interventions for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Are Practice Guidelines Based on Systematic Reviews?Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement.

P2860

Q34510579-BB590725-E698-488C-84FE-0C260CB5F8D8 Q42904950-46F9E1B2-071A-4881-B8A2-0A5D5E205647

P2860

Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38065256

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articol științific

@ro

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@gl

artigo científico

@pt

artigo científico

@pt-br

artikel ilmiah

@id

artikull shkencor

@sq

artículo científico

@es

name

Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews.

@en

type

Item

label

Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews.

@en

prefLabel

Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews.

@en

P1476

Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews

@en

P2093

Gary M Oderda

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Clinical application of opioid equianalgesic data.

External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR).

An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions.

Accuracy in equianalgesic dosing. conversion dilemmas.

Equianalgesic dose ratios for opioids. a critical review and proposals for long-term dosing.

Locating and appraising systematic reviews.

Opioid analgesics: comparative features and prescribing guidelines.

How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

P304

341-347

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.3109/15360288.2012.734904

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Surasak Saokaew

P577

2012-12-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

233874338

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

23216173

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews.

about

P2860

P2860

Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698