Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation.
about
Models to Tailor Brain Stimulation Therapies in StrokeHuman Motor Cortex Functional Changes in Acute Stroke: Gender EffectsSpasticity, Motor Recovery, and Neural Plasticity after Stroke.Synergistic but independent: The role of corticospinal and alternate motor fibers for residual motor output after strokeNon-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Upper Limb Motor Practice Poststroke: A Model for Selection of Cortical Site.Selective activation of ipsilateral motor pathways in intact humans.Recovery of precision grasping after motor cortex lesion does not require forced use of the impaired hand in Macaca mulatta.Transcranial direct current stimulation improves ipsilateral selective muscle activation in a frequency dependent manner.Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time.Partial weight support of the arm affects corticomotor selectivity of biceps brachii.Tailoring Brain Stimulation to the Nature of Rehabilitative Therapies in Stroke: A Conceptual Framework Based on their Unique Mechanisms of Recovery.Magnetoencephalographic study of hand and foot sensorimotor organization in 325 consecutive patients evaluated for tumor or epilepsy surgery.Frontal and frontoparietal injury differentially affect the ipsilateral corticospinal projection from the nonlesioned hemisphere in monkey (Macaca mulatta)Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.Are ipsilateral motor evoked potentials subject to intracortical inhibition?Val66Met BDNF gene polymorphism influences human motor cortex plasticity in acute strokeBDNF Genotype Interacts with Motor Function to Influence Rehabilitation Responsiveness PoststrokeAnodal direct current stimulation in the healthy aged: Effects determined by the hemisphere stimulated.Motor recovery and microstructural change in rubro-spinal tract in subcortical stroke.Neuronal Correlates of Functional Coupling between Reach- and Grasp-Related Components of Muscle Activity.A neuroanatomical framework for upper limb synergies after stroke.The potential for non-invasive brain stimulation to improve function after amputation.Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.Anatomical Parameters of tDCS to Modulate the Motor System after Stroke: A Review.Increased functional connectivity after stroke correlates with behavioral scores in non-human primate model.LOTUS overexpression accelerates neuronal plasticity after focal brain ischemia in mice.Combined corticospinal and reticulospinal effects on upper limb muscles.Exploring the Evolution of Cortical Excitability Following Acute Stroke.Characterizing differential poststroke corticomotor drive to the dorsi- and plantarflexor muscles during resting and volitional muscle activation.Bilateral movements increase sustained extensor force in the paretic arm.A dissociation between propriospinal facilitation and inhibition after bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation
P2860
Q26752415-8C2DFD5A-2623-4088-AB59-61E3533DCABAQ27313569-ACB4E590-D777-4F1D-8204-0C6AD411659FQ30358455-80F3A4DE-8FD6-4D4E-BAAA-7A3E196ACE75Q33660336-E7358253-A6C7-4A14-93B0-941F346E1A0BQ33734749-92FFF587-4CBE-44DE-893F-90AA6CA243A4Q34345645-BD61525C-01AD-4117-BE90-86EEDA71914EQ34560022-5DE72E4A-1B2F-4588-BA7A-AA47AEE20F31Q35225217-B5628619-69A8-453D-9A49-7F3E9C023128Q35985614-2BAD4059-68FA-42B2-A7F3-6CFEB5139FEEQ36217778-DFC7D29D-34C6-4572-813D-4ECB6FD72054Q36242307-F9A58DEB-3C23-4B18-BB7B-817B5A381E40Q36320760-9BCD4925-9A19-4846-91D2-A53DD672CBC8Q36362978-1AF0C62A-DF03-49E9-8DFF-A30D8F3ADB77Q36518557-47050629-6247-4A83-8F0C-E8FE865F3B35Q36735009-EAE52528-A7AF-430A-9F44-DB128CFC63E9Q36745274-6F091F62-589F-4632-BC61-C390BA62E560Q36906438-D8549BBD-0B82-4C8D-9A4B-479E59DF3E3DQ37044172-C4BFCB69-45ED-41B8-AB21-04B7BBE12886Q37477503-C63947CF-C4CF-4C96-888C-5543BCD59415Q37653757-F0C2789E-5936-4E60-AB9D-8822C1C8545BQ38374729-48E23ECF-DF1F-411A-A6B1-BC7932EE0E19Q38620419-3CB31E8C-67B1-4CC9-AEC7-16651E86655CQ38731302-EEF4CFF3-E7E9-4765-9052-208D65E24793Q39148606-CEA04CE4-6A8A-4B3A-A13B-1BB406BE20F8Q41158542-9C0D29F8-0105-4826-8687-6E0A27192E22Q41573485-1AE71846-46B6-4C65-B90C-FAEC454CBABBQ41822390-0FD42D5E-233D-4383-8C33-5617EC43C717Q48091830-B62CD921-6E37-4BEE-9F8C-45845E7C07DFQ52927970-68AF9DF6-F6DE-4DBE-9CD2-5E13E1EABED8Q53586605-F3BF94DC-D7C6-4D22-A366-CD298C531F9CQ58641260-7771AB27-7658-4CA1-895B-A13CA3CACF18
P2860
Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation.
@en
type
label
Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation.
@en
prefLabel
Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation.
@en
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation.
@en
P2860
P356
10.3389/FNHUM.2013.00184
P577
2013-05-08T00:00:00Z